Re-Evaluating the Income Elasticity of the Property Tax Base

1986 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terri Erickson Sexton ◽  
Richard J. Sexton
1964 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
BENJAMIN B. BRIDGES,

AERA Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 233285842199114
Author(s):  
Phuong Nguyen-Hoang

Tax increment financing (TIF)—an economic (re)development tool originally designed for urban cities—has been available to rural communities for decades. This is the first study to focus solely on TIF in rural school districts, to examine TIF effects on school districts’ property tax base and rates, and to conduct event-study estimations of TIF effects. The study finds that TIF has mostly positive effects on rural school districts’ property tax base and mixed effects on property tax rates, and that TIF-induced increases in tax base come primarily from residential property and slightly from commercial property. The study’s findings assert the importance of returned excess increment if rural school districts in Iowa and many other states are to benefit from TIF.


2021 ◽  
pp. 152700252110369
Author(s):  
Ege Can ◽  
Mark W. Nichols

In May 2018, the Supreme Court overturned the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, thereby allowing all states to offer sports betting. Prior to this, Nevada was the only state with unrestricted sports betting. Using sports betting data from Nevada, we estimate long-run and short-run income elasticities to determine the growth and volatility of sports betting as a tax base. Sports gambling grows at a similar rate as state income and is stable and insensitive to short-run shocks to income. However, the amount of money kept by casinos, and hence the state, is small compared to other traditional tax bases.


1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter S. Fisher

State gram programs aimed at equalizing local government fiscal capacities and metropolitan-wide programs for the sharing of property tax bases are very similar in terms of objectives as well as operation. The Twin Cities tax base sharing system, which has served as a model for numerous other proposals, has some serious deficiencies; a proposal for eliminating these defects is developed by viewing tax base sharing as a set of fiscal capacity equalizing grants. Alternative formulas are evaluated, and the merits of tax base sharing at the state rather than metropolitan level are discussed.


1976 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack P. Suyderhoud ◽  
Michael Veseth

This paper defines the relationship between the nominal (or money) income elasticity and the real income elasticity of a tax system. Under most circumstances, the real and the nominal income elasticities differ. This difference has not been recognized by economists who rely strictly on nominal elasticities as an indicator of revenue adequacy or tax burden, a practice which can be misleading, especially under conditions of general price inflation. The income tax, sales tax and property tax are analyzed briefly in terms of their elasticity features.


2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-163
Author(s):  
Randall White

In the more recent past, property tax reform in the City of Toronto has been thwarted by suggestions of "progressive elements" in the single residential tax base, that hold out prospects of regressive shifts in the residential tax burden in the wake of a reassessment. Study of the evolution of the tax base in five city neighbourhoods since the early 1920s indicates that these progressive elements are largely an unintended consequence of historical changes in neighbourhood real estate markets. Moreover, what potential there is for regressive tax shifts could be offset significantly by some updated form of a partial graded dwelling house exemption in the City's traditional property tax system. The urban history of the Toronto property tax, however, does illustrate the political and technical challenges of property tax reform through market value assessment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Gabriel Kayode Babawale

Property tax has remained a subject of recurrent debate amongst policy makers, scholars, public officials, real estate valuers, and other stakeholders, virtually everywhere over the years. The contention centres on issues such as the tax base, tax incidence, efficiency, and particularly, equity or fairness, among others. Qualities like ease of collection, difficulty of avoidance, accountability, and transparency etc., that ordinarily mark out property tax as a good tax in principle, are often compromised by controversial policies and mal-administration, particularly the latter. The new Lagos State Land Use Charge2018 (LUC, 2018) came into force effective January, 2018. Ina similar version that its immediate predecessor, the Land Use Charge2001 (LUC, 2001), attracted spontaneous and widespread protests on promulgation, the criticisms and protests that greeted the passage LUC (2018)has been vehement and remained unabated until the government was forced, like it did with the erstwhile law, to succumb to substantial but arbitrary reductions in rates and allowances across board (at two different times to date) but without a formal amendment to the law; an exact replica of what transpired under the erstwhile law and which opened it to abuse and arbitrary implementation with its compliance and revenue yields implications. The last of these reductions which took place in August saw a whopping 50%, and 25% cut in assessed rates on commercial properties and industrial properties, respectively. This study employed the doctrinal research methodology whereby the valuation or assessment aspect of the LUC (2018) was diagnosed with a view to finding amicable resolutions to the equity problem that virtually crippled the effectiveness of LUC (2001) over its seventeen years of existence and is already threatening the survival of the new LUC (2018). Keywords: assessment criteria, equity and fairness, Land Use Charge (2018), property tax.


Author(s):  
P. G. Sorokina ◽  
◽  
O. V. Leonova ◽  
L. Yu. Volchenko ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tax Base ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document