Navalists and Antinavalists: The Naval Policy Debate in the United States, 1785-1827

1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
William M. Fowler ◽  
Craig L. Symonds
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Policy Debate ◽  
Naval Policy

Navalists and Antinavalists: The Naval Policy Debate in the United States, 1785-1827.

1981 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Christopher McKee ◽  
Craig L. Symonds
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Policy Debate ◽  
Naval Policy

The 2016 U.S. Presidential Campaign: Changing Discourse on Palestine

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-49
Author(s):  
Phyllis Bennis
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Democratic Party ◽  
The United States ◽  
Presidential Campaign ◽  
Antiwar Movement ◽  
Policy Debate ◽  
Policy Analyst ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Impact

This essay examines the discourse on Palestine/Israel in the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, charting the impact of the Palestine rights movement on the domestic U.S. policy debate. Policy analyst, author, and long-time activist Phyllis Bennis notes the sea change within the Democratic Party evident in the unprecedented debate on the issue outside traditionally liberal Zionist boundaries. The final Democratic platform was as pro-Israel and anti-Palestinian as any in history, but the process of getting there was revolutionary in no small part, Bennis argues, due to the grassroots campaign of veteran U.S. senator Bernie Sanders. Bennis also discusses the Republican platform on Israel/Palestine, outlining the positions of the final three Republican contenders. Although she is clear about the current weakness of the broad antiwar movement in the United States, Bennis celebrates its Palestinian rights component and its focus on education and BDS to challenge the general public's “ignorance” on Israel/Palestine.

scholarly journals Substitution between Immigrant and Native Farmworkers in the United States: Does Legal Status Matter?

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan Wei ◽  
Gülcan Önel ◽  
Zhengfei Guan ◽  
Fritz Roka
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Substitution Effect ◽  
The United States ◽  
Elasticity Of Substitution ◽  
Immigrant Workers ◽  
Policy Debate ◽  
Constant Elasticity ◽  
Constant Elasticity Of Substitution ◽  
Unauthorized Immigrant

AbstractThe policy debate surrounding the employment of immigrant workers in U.S. agriculture centers around the extent to which immigrant farmworkers adversely affect the economic opportunities of native farmworkers. To help answer this question, we propose a three-layer nested constant elasticity of substitution (CES) framework to investigate the substitutability among heterogeneous farmworker groups based on age, skill, and legal status utilizing National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS) data from 1989 through 2012. We use farmwork experience and type of task performed as alternative proxies for skill to disentangle the substitution effect between U.S. citizens, authorized immigrants, and unauthorized immigrant farmworkers. Results show that substitutability between the three legal status groups is small; neither authorized nor unauthorized immigrant farmworkers have a significant impact on the employment of native farmworkers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document