Chamber Symphony

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 481
Author(s):  
Larry Starr ◽  
Ellen Taaffe Zwilich
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Heinze
Keyword(s):  

1966 ◽  
Vol 107 (1483) ◽  
pp. 784
Author(s):  
David Blake ◽  
Schoenberg ◽  
Lausanne Chamber Orch ◽  
Desarzens ◽  
Scherchen
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 37-56
Author(s):  
А.А. Упанова

Статья посвящена сочинениям известных петербургских композиторов — Концерту «Доменико Скарлатти» для четырехструнной домры (мандолины) и  камерного оркестра Игоря Ефимовича Рогалёва и  Концерту для домры и  камерно-симфонического оркестра Андрея Генриховича Тихомирова. Эти произведения представляют примеры взаимодействия сфер народно-инструментального исполнительства и  академического музыкального искусства. Ранее данная проблема не  рассматривалась в  отечественном музыкознании. Появление в  последней четверти XX века сочинений, в которых домра выступает в качестве солиста с симфоническим оркестром, в значительной мере способствовало расширению ее выразительных возможностей, а  также становлению и  развитию нового направления в  домровом репертуаре. Основными позициями сравнительного анализа концертов И.  Е.  Рогалёва и  А.  Г.  Тихомирова стали трактовка роли солирующей домры, различия в композиции и драматургии названных сочинений. Отдельное внимание уделяется вопросам исполнительской интерпретации. Автором статьи приведены нотные примеры, иллюстрирующие наиболее важные с его точки зрения идеи и положения. The article is devoted to the works of famous St. Petersburg composers — Concerto Domenico Scarlatti for four-string domra (mandolin) and chamber orchestra by Igor Ye. Rogalyov and Concerto for domra and chamber symphony orchestra by Andrey G. Tikhomirov. These works are examples of interaction of the spheres of folk-instrumental performance and academic musical art. Previously, this problem was not considered in Russian musicology. In the last quarter of the 20th century, compositions appeared, where domra acts as a soloist with a symphony orchestra, which to a large extent contributed to expansion of its expressive capabilities, as well as formation and development of a new direction in the domra repertoire. The main positions of the comparative analysis of the Rogalyov’s and Tikhomirov’s concertos were: interpretation of the solo domra’s role, differences in the composition and dramaturgy of the above works. Special attention is paid to the issues of performing interpretation. The author of the article proposes musical examples illustrating the most important ideas and provisions from her point of view.


1968 ◽  
Vol 109 (1502) ◽  
pp. 348
Author(s):  
Wilfrid Mellers ◽  
Schoenberg ◽  
Harper ◽  
Hamburger ◽  
Alldis Choir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Tempo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (298) ◽  
pp. 20-40
Author(s):  
Edward Venn

AbstractDespite an ever-expanding body of literature on Adès's engagement with the music of the past, his use of traditional formal models has attracted little critical comment. That which does exist privileges the relatively straightforward surface articulation of his musical forms over more nuanced accounts. In the case of Adès's sonata forms, this has had at least two consequences for our understanding of his music: first, that too strong an emphasis on syntactical groupings occludes what is happening discursively in the music; and second, that ‘textbook’ models are not the only formal tradition with which Adès's sonata forms engage. Rather, his sonatas bear traces of a rotational model that recalls the examples of Janáček and Sibelius. This article considers how Adès's sonata forms can be constituted not as neo-classical prefabrications but, a posteriori, as a practice that emerges across his career – from the Chamber Symphony and …but all shall be well to the Piano Quintet and Concerto for Piano and Orchestra – from an interaction between traditional syntactical groupings, thematic procedures and tonal plots.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document