scholarly journals The Soviet Far East and Central Asia.

1944 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Harley Farnsworth MacNair ◽  
William Mandel
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
B. Badamdorj ◽  

The insect fauna of Mongolia includes about 12,000 species belonging to 24 orders. The only order, Orthoptera, is richer in species in Mongolia than in the Far East of Russia. All other units show greater diversity in the Russian Far East than in Mongolia. There are a significant number of very interesting endemics. Tizanuras of the family Machilidae are relic insects, represented by five species in Mongolia. As examples of widespread Central Asian insects, a number of species of darkling beetles and weevils can be indicated, most of which are endemic to Mongolia or Central Asia.


Author(s):  

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Moesziomyces bullatus (J. Schröt.) Vánky. Hosts: Echinochloa crus-galli. Information is given on the geographical distribution in ASIA, Azerbaijan, China, Fujian, Jilin, Sichuan, Manchuria, Kazakhstan, Iran, Japan, Russia ,: Caucasus, central Asia, Siberia, far, east Taiwan, Uzbekhistan, AUSTRALASIA & OCEANIA, Australia, New Zealand, EUROPE, Bulgaria, former, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, European region, Ukraine, NORTH AMERICA, Canada, Mexico, USA, eastern states, SOUTH AMERICA, Brazil, SC.


1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-311
Author(s):  
A. K. Sverdlov ◽  
Yu. E. Sorkin

The Medical Faculty of Kazan University was opened on May 2 (14), 1814. Up to 1888 this faculty was the only higher medical educational institution on the vast territory of our country, covering the basins of Volga and Kama, Ural, Siberia, Far East, Caucasus and Central Asia. Many Ural physicians, later famous medical scientists, were educated at Kazan University: A.A. Mislavsky, P.V. Rudanovsky, P.V. Kuznetsky, B.I. Kotelansky, B.P. Kushelevsky and A.T. Lidsky.


Zootaxa ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4318 (1) ◽  
pp. 167 ◽  
Author(s):  
DMITRI YU. TISHECHKIN

Two species from the Aphrodes bicincta group were revealed in the Eastern Palaearctic based on male calling signal analysis. A. bicincta = A. bicincta ferganensis Dubovsky, 1966 syn. n. was found only in Kazakhstan and Central Asia; in these regions it is sometimes sympatric with A. diminuta = A. centrorossica. A. diminuta occurs in Kazakhstan, Central Asia, Siberia, and the Russian Far East. Males of both species from the Eastern Palaearctic usually can be easily distinguished by the size, coloration, and penis shape. Also, despite the size differences from European specimens, the key from Bluemel et al. (2014) can be successfully used for their identification. 


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Banks ◽  
Bernd Heinold ◽  
Kerstin Schepanski

<p>Over the past several decades, new sources of dust aerosol have appeared in the Middle East and Central Asia due to the desiccation of lakes in the region. It is known that recently dry lakebeds can be efficient dust sources, due to the availability of readily erodible alluvial sediments. Such lake source regions include: Lake Urmia in western Iran; the Sistan Basin in the border area between Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan; and most notably, the Aral Sea on the border between Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. A particularly large area (over 50,000 km<sup>2</sup>) of the former lakebed of the Aral Sea has become exposed to aeolian wind erosion, leaving Central Asia susceptible to dust storms originating from the young ‘Aral Kum’ (Aral Desert).</p><p>In this work we update the dust transport model COSMO-MUSCAT in order to simulate dust emissions from these relatively new dust sources. Making use of the Global Surface Water dataset (produced by the Copernicus Programme) in order to define the surface water coverage, we make estimates of dust emissions under three scenarios: 1) the ‘Past’, representative of water coverage in the 1980s; 2) the ‘Present’, representative of water coverage in the 2010s; and 3) the ‘Dry’ scenario, a worst-case future scenario in which currently drying lake regions are assumed to dry out completely under the pressure of climate change and water overuse. These scenarios are applied to the ‘Dustbelt’ modelling domain, covering North Africa, the Middle East and the Arabian Peninsula, and Central Asia as far east as western China.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-112
Author(s):  
Elena N. Nazemtseva

The publication analyzes the reasons and particular qualities of the migration crisis on the Russian-Chinese border in 1917–1922. This crisis was caused by the revolution and the Civil War in Russia. A huge mass of former subjects of the Russian Empire, who disagreed with the new system, were forced to leave their homeland and in the early 1920s formed one of the largest emigrant diasporas in the world in China. The bulk of the White Army’s remnants the civilian population crossed the Russian-Chinese border in the Far East, forming Russian refugee camps in the Chinese border area. A significant number of Russians crossed the border in western China, in the region of Xinjiang province, where several refugee camps also emerged. The composition of Russian refugees has raised serious concerns in both the central and border authorities of China: the bulk of the refugees were well-armed experienced military men who had gone through not only the Russian Civil War, but also the First World War and refused to surrender their weapons, the Cossacks and their chieftains, peasants and merchants from the border regions who did not want to obey anyone, who needed help. A small part of the Russians who left for China were nobles and intellectuals, who settled mainly in Harbin and Shanghai. The peculiarity of the migration situation in the Far East, as well as on the Russian-Chinese border in Central Asia, was not only in the huge number of Russians who arrived in China, but also in the fact that a severe internal political crisis had been developing in China itself for several years. The Chinese authorities were unable to control the situation in the country, and Russian refugees aggravated the situation. In addition, the Chinese authorities did not want to aggravate relations with Soviet Russia, which repeatedly threatened to send troops to eliminate the remnants of the White Army, which had settled in the Chinese border area. This could seriously aggravate the political situation in the Far East and Central Asia. Therefore, the Chinese authorities actively took measures to regulate the flow of Russian refugees and prevent a possible crisis: they blocked the border with Russia in some areas, expelled refugees back, did not issue permits to cross the border, etc.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document