Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Outbreak at a Veterans' Affairs Medical Center: Importance of Carriage of the Organism by Hospital Personnel

1990 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 291-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette C. Reboli ◽  
Joseph F. John ◽  
Christel G. Platt ◽  
J. Robert Cantey
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Hospital Personnel ◽  
Methicillin Resistant

Perception vs Reality: Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carriage Among Healthcare Workers at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center

2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora E. Colburn ◽  
Jennifer Cadnum ◽  
Elizabeth Flannery ◽  
Shelley Chang ◽  
Curtis J. Donskey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Prevalence Study ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Knowledge Deficit

In a prevalence study of 209 healthcare workers, 18 (8.6%) and 13 (6.2%) carried methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in their nares or on their hands, respectively. However, 100 (62%) of 162 workers completing an associated survey believed themselves to be colonized, revealing a knowledge deficit about methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus epidemiology.Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;37(1):110–112

The Decrease in Healthcare-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections and Savings From Glycopeptide Use

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1131-1132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diler Coşkun ◽  
Jale Aytaç
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Healthcare Associated

We evaluated changes in the rate of healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and healthcare-associated S. aureus infections after implementation of infection control precautions and the effect of this on glycopeptide use and expenditures for glycopeptides in a private medical center in Turkey in the years 2000-2005. A striking decrease was obtained in the number of MRSA infections, and the expenditure for glycopeptide use also decreased

Tolerability of a probiotic in subjects with a history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Warrack ◽  
P. Panjikar ◽  
M. Duster ◽  
N. Safdar
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Public Health Importance ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
History Of ◽  
Study Population

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a pathogen of major public health importance. Colonisation precedes infection; thus reducing MRSA carriage may be of benefit for reducing infection. Probiotics represent a novel approach to reducing MRSA carriage. We undertook a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of the tolerability and acceptability of probiotics for reducing nasal and intestinal carriage of MRSA. In addition, subjects were screened for vancomycin-resistant enterocococci (VRE). Subjects with a history of MRSA were recruited from a large, academic medical center and randomised to take either a placebo or probiotic (Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001). Subjects returned to the clinic after four weeks for further testing to determine adherence to the probiotic regimen and colonisation of MRSA. 48 subjects were enrolled and randomised. Nearly 25% were transplant recipients and 30% had diabetes. The probiotic was well tolerated in the study population though minor side effects, such as nausea and bloating, were observed. A majority of the subjects randomised to HN001 had good adherence to the regimen. At the four week time point among subjects randomised to the probiotic, MRSA was detected in 67 and 50% of subjects colonised in the nares and the gastrointestinal tract, respectively. Three subjects who initially tested positive for VRE were negative after four weeks of probiotic exposure. Probiotics were well tolerated in our study population of largely immunocompromised subjects with multiple comorbidities. Adherence to the intervention was good. Probiotics should be studied further for their potential to reduce colonisation by multidrug resistant bacteria.

scholarly journals Incidence and Characteristics of Vancomycin Nonsusceptible Strains of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus at Hershey Medical Center

2008 ◽  
Vol 52 (12) ◽  
pp. 4510-4513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaudia Kosowska-Shick ◽  
Lois M. Ednie ◽  
Pamela McGhee ◽  
Kathy Smith ◽  
Cynthia D. Todd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Brain Heart Infusion ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Repeat Testing ◽  
False Positivity ◽  
Positive Results

ABSTRACT All 982 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains collected from August 2006 to December 2007 were tested for vancomycin susceptibility by using 3-μg/ml vancomycin brain heart infusion screening plates, a vancomycin Etest, and a vancomycin/teicoplanin macro Etest. Three vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) (0.3%) and two heterogeneous VISA (0.2%) isolates were identified. The screening method yielded 895 cases of ≤1 colony and 87 positive results (with growth of >1 colony after 48 h); further Etests showed 82/87 isolates with growth on screening plates to be false positive. Repeat testing showed a false-positivity rate of only 15 of the original 87 isolates by plate screening.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document