William Craig. Linear reasoning. A new form of the Herbrand-Gentzen theorem. The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 22 (1957), pp. 250–268. - William Craig. Three uses of the Herbrand-Gentzen theorem in relating model theory and proof theory. The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 22 (1957), pp. 269–285.

1959 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-244
Author(s):  
Burton Dreben
Keyword(s):  
Model Theory ◽  
Proof Theory ◽  
Symbolic Logic ◽  
New Form

Logic and Philosophical Methodology

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Burgess
Keyword(s):  
Set Theory ◽  
Model Theory ◽  
Classical Logic ◽  
Proof Theory ◽  
Recursion Theory ◽  
Theory Model ◽  
Philosophical Methodology ◽  
Paraconsistent Logics ◽  
Philosophical Logic

This article explores the role of logic in philosophical methodology, as well as its application in philosophy. The discussion gives a roughly equal coverage to the seven branches of logic: elementary logic, set theory, model theory, recursion theory, proof theory, extraclassical logics, and anticlassical logics. Mathematical logic comprises set theory, model theory, recursion theory, and proof theory. Philosophical logic in the relevant sense is divided into the study of extensions of classical logic, such as modal or temporal or deontic or conditional logics, and the study of alternatives to classical logic, such as intuitionistic or quantum or partial or paraconsistent logics. The nonclassical consists of the extraclassical and the anticlassical, although the distinction is not clearcut.

S. S. Goncharov. Autostability and computable families of constructivizations. Algebra and Logic, vol. 14 (1975), no. 6, pp. 392–409. - S. S. Goncharov. The quantity of nonautoequivalent constructivizations. Algebra and Logic, vol. 16 (1977), no. 3, pp. 169–185. - S. S. Goncharov and V. D. Dzgoev. Autostability of models. Algebra and Logic, vol. 19 (1980), no. 1, pp. 28–37. - J. B. Remmel. Recursively categorical linear orderings. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 83 (1981), no. 2, pp. 387–391. - Terrence Millar. Recursive categoricity and persistence. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 51 (1986), no. 2, pp. 430–434. - Peter Cholak, Segey Goncharov, Bakhadyr Khoussainov and Richard A. Shore. Computably categorical structures and expansions by constants. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 64 (1999), no. 1, pp. 13–137. - Peter Cholak, Richard A. Shore and Reed Solomon. A computably stable structure with no Scott family of finitary formulas. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 45 (2006), no. 5, pp. 519–538. - Chris Ash, Julia Knight, Mark Manasse and Theodore Slaman. Generic copies of countable structures. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 42 (1989), no. 3, pp. 195–205. - John Chisholm. Effective model theory vs. recursive model theory. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 55 (1990), no. 3, pp. 1168–1191.

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-134
Author(s):  
Daniel Turetsky
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Logic ◽  
Model Theory ◽  
American Mathematical Society ◽  
Effective Model ◽  
Mathematical Society ◽  
Symbolic Logic ◽  
Applied Logic ◽  
Recursive Model ◽  
Linear Orderings ◽  
Scott Family

Jon Barwise and John Schlipf. On recursively saturated models of arithmetic. Model theory and algebra, A memorial tribute to Abraham Robinson, edited by D. H. Saracino and V. B. Weispfenning, Lecture notes in mathematics, vol. 498, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, and New York, 1975, pp. 42–55. - Patrick Cegielski, Kenneth McAloon, and George Wilmers. Modèles récursivement saturés de l'addition et de la multiplication des entiers naturels. Logic Colloquium '80, Papers intended for the European summer meeting of the Association for Symbolic Logic, edited by D. van Dalen, D. Lascar, and T. J. Smiley, Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, vol. 108, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, New York, and London, 1982, pp. 57–68. - Julia F. Knight. Theories whose resplendent models are homogeneous. Israel journal of mathematics, vol. 42 (1982), pp. 151–161. - Julia Knight and Mark Nadel. Expansions of models and Turing degrees. The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 47 (1982), pp. 587–604. - Julia Knight and Mark Nadel. Models of arithmetic and closed ideals. The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 47 no. 4 (for 1982, pub. 1983), pp. 833–840. - Henryk Kotlarski. On elementary cuts in models of arithmetic. Fundamenta mathematicae, vol. 115 (1983), pp. 27–31. - H. Kotlarski, S. Krajewski, and A. H. Lachlan. Construction of satisfaction classes for nonstandard models. Canadian mathematical bulletin—Bulletin canadien de mathématiques, vol. 24 (1981), pp. 283–293. - A. H. Lachlan. Full satisfaction classes and recursive saturation. Canadian mathematical bulletin—Bulletin canadien de mathématiques, pp. 295–297. - Leonard Lipshitz and Mark Nadel. The additive structure of models of arithmetic. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 68 (1978), pp. 331–336. - Mark Nadel. On a problem of MacDowell and Specker. The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 45 (1980), pp. 612–622. - C. Smoryński. Back-and-forth inside a recursively saturated model of arithmetic. Logic Colloquium '80, Papers intended for the European summer meeting of the Association for Symbolic Logic, edited by D. van Dalen, D. Lascar, and T. J. Smiley, Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, vol. 108, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, New York, and London, 1982, pp. 273–278. - C. Smoryński and J. Stavi. Cofinal extension preserves recursive saturation. Model theory of algebra and arithmetic, Proceedings of the Conference on Applications of Logic to Algebra and Arithmetic held at Karpacz, Poland, September 1–7,1979, edited by L. Pacholski, J. Wierzejewski, and A. J. Wilkie, Lecture notes in mathematics, vol. 834, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, and New York, 1980, pp. 338–345. - George Wilmers. Minimally saturated models. Model theory of algebra and arithmetic, Proceedings of the Conference on Applications of Logic to Algebra and Arithmetic held at Karpacz, Poland, September 1–7, 1979, edited by L. Pacholski, J. Wierzejewski, and A. J. Wilkie, Lecture notes in mathematics, vol. 834, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, and New York, 1980, pp. 370–380.

1987 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 279-284
Author(s):  
J.-P. Ressayre
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Model Theory ◽  
Foundations Of Mathematics ◽  
Symbolic Logic ◽  
Recursive Saturation ◽  
North Holland Publishing ◽  
Lecture Notes ◽  
Recursively Saturated ◽  
Satisfaction Classes ◽  
Models Of Arithmetic

One hundred and two problems in mathematical logic

1975 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harvey Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Logic ◽  
Set Theory ◽  
Model Theory ◽  
Proof Theory ◽  
Recursion Theory ◽  
Logic Model ◽  
Mathematical Statement ◽  
Question Mark ◽  
Truth Value ◽  
Expository Paper

This expository paper contains a list of 102 problems which, at the time of publication, are unsolved. These problems are distributed in four subdivisions of logic: model theory, proof theory and intuitionism, recursion theory, and set theory. They are written in the form of statements which we believe to be at least as likely as their negations. These should not be viewed as conjectures since, in some cases, we had no opinion as to which way the problem would go.In each case where we believe a problem did not originate with us, we made an effort to pinpoint a source. Often this was a difficult matter, based on subjective judgments. When we were unable to pinpoint a source, we left a question mark. No inference should be drawn concerning the beliefs of the originator of a problem as to which way it will go (lest the originator be us).The choice of these problems was based on five criteria. Firstly, we are only including problems which call for the truth value of a particular mathematical statement. A second criterion is the extent to which the concepts involved in the statements are concepts that are well known, well denned, and well understood, as well as having been extensively considered in the literature. A third criterion is the extent to which these problems have natural, simple and attractive formulations. A fourth criterion is the extent to which there is evidence that a real difficulty exists in finding a solution. Lastly and unavoidably, the extent to which these problems are connected with the author's research interests in mathematical logic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document