Ecuador: Birth Spacing Reduces Infant Deaths, Optimum Spacing Between Births is 27-38 Months

1976 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 11
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. A84-A84
Author(s):  
Student

Less than 5% of the poor world's children were being immunised at the start of the decade. Now the proportion is over 50%. The UN target is 85% vaccination coverage by the end of 1990. China is expected to achieve this by the end of this year, and India, with 20% of the world's infants, is now passing the 60% level. Immunisation saves lives and reduces morbidity—poliovaccination prevents 190 000 cases every year. But only 25% of pregnant women are vaccinated against tetanus, which kills 800 000 infants annually. Improvemments in transport and cool storage of vaccines have extended the reach of immunisation programmes. Almost half the developing world's children are not protected by immunisation—another 2-3 million lives could be saved and 240 000 cases of poliomyelitis could be prevented a year. Rapid spread of knowledge about family planning, especially birth spacing, is a major break-through. Births that are "too many or too close" or to mothers who are "too old or too young" cause up to a quarter of all maternal and infant deaths world wide. Sensible spacing of births could save the lives of 3 million children and 200 000 mothers every year. The use of oral rehydration therapy saves almost a million children annually and has been a success story. But another 1.6 million child deaths from diarrhoea could be saved if use of this simple and cheap technigue could be extended.


BMJ ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 1 (5374) ◽  
pp. 57-57
Author(s):  
J. Taylor
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Milroy ◽  
Charis Kepron

Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has been used as a cause of death for over four decades. It has allowed deaths of infants to be registered as natural. Within this group of deaths, a certain number have been recognized to be homicides from inflicted smothering rather than being natural or accidental deaths. Research has been conducted using confidential inquires to determine how frequent homicide is in cases called SIDS. This paper traces the history of quoted rates of homicide. Early work suggested the figure was between 2-10% of all SIDS cases, though other workers have suggested figures as high as 20-40%. With the fall in the rate of infant deaths following the “Back to Sleep” campaigns, these figures have been reevaluated. If the higher figures were correct that 20-40% of SIDS were homicides, the fall in infant deaths would be expected to be less than it has been. Current data suggests a much lower figure than 10% of current cases, with much lower overall rates of infant deaths. As well as 10% of SIDS cases having been stated to be homicides, a related question is whether multiple deaths classified as SIDS are really homicides. The paper discusses the maxim that one death is a tragedy, two is suspicious, and three deaths indicate homicide. The paper also looks at court cases and the approach that has been made in prosecutions of sudden unexpected death in infancy as multiple murder.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document