The Contest of Memory in "Tintern Abbey"

1995 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Vander Weele

Modern critics have been suspicious of the "abundant recompense" that "Tintern Abbey" claims for the replacement of youthful joys by mature thought. Many have contrasted unconscious motivation and surface articulation within the poem. But what if Wordsworth was more self-conscious about the efficacy of memory than we give him credit for? I argue that both the language and the structure of the poem show Wordsworth questioning the claims he was making for memory. But were there resources available for him to understand memory differently than we do-as well as to call that understanding into question? I argue that there were, and that they can be found both in texts echoed in the poem and in a long tradition of reflection on memory recently described by Mary Carruthers in The Book of Memory (1990). Where critics such as Harold Bloom have seen a blind spot in Wordswoth's self-consciousness and have brought psychoanalytic theory to bear upon their analysis of memory, I argue that Wordsworth's categories for understanding and questioning memory were at least as historical and ethical as they were psychological and aesthetic. Seeing the author work out of and question a tradition of memory as ethical construction helps us understand what is at stake in the poem. Less productive is the assumption that only the poem's readers can figures the riven text below its smooth surfaces.

Author(s):  
L. Andrew Staehelin

Freeze-etched membranes usually appear as relatively smooth surfaces covered with numerous small particles and a few small holes (Fig. 1). In 1966 Branton (1“) suggested that these surfaces represent split inner mem¬brane faces and not true external membrane surfaces. His theory has now gained wide acceptance partly due to new information obtained from double replicas of freeze-cleaved specimens (2,3) and from freeze-etch experi¬ments with surface labeled membranes (4). While theses studies have fur¬ther substantiated the basic idea of membrane splitting and have shown clearly which membrane faces are complementary to each other, they have left the question open, why the replicated membrane faces usually exhibit con¬siderably fewer holes than particles. According to Branton's theory the number of holes should on the average equal the number of particles. The absence of these holes can be explained in either of two ways: a) it is possible that no holes are formed during the cleaving process e.g. due to plastic deformation (5); b) holes may arise during the cleaving process but remain undetected because of inadequate replication and microscope techniques.


1975 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 641-642
Author(s):  
JUDITH LONG LAWS

1983 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 642-642
Author(s):  
Paul L. Wachtel

1983 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-223
Author(s):  
Linda S. Penn

1985 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 397-398
Author(s):  
Richard E. Geha

1992 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 824-824
Author(s):  
Allen E. Willner

1992 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 614-614
Author(s):  
Seymour Fisher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document