The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages.Harold BloomThe Future of the Middle Ages: Medieval Literature in the 1990s.William D. PadenThe Past and Future of Medieval Studies.John Van Engen

Speculum ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 686-689
Author(s):  
Charles T. Wood
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Prendergast ◽  
Stephanie Trigg

Conventional wisdom sees medievalism occurring “after” the Middle Ages; and indeed much medievalist practice seems to support this view, as the Middle Ages are often conceptualised in spatio-temporal terms, through the fictions of time-travel and the specific trope of “portal medievalism”. But the two formations are more accurately seen as mutually constitutive. Medieval literature offers many examples of layered or multiple temporalities. These are often structured around cultural and social difference, which is figured in powerfully affective, not just epistemological terms. Several examples from medieval English literature demonstrate how medieval culture prefigures many of medievalism’s concerns with the alterity of the past.


The Middle Ages added their own ludological culture traditions to those which they had inherited from the Ancient Ages. First of all, such notions were connected with the form of existence and perceiving the Christianity which was a basis for the whole civilization. Epistemological notions of those times were also built in accordance to those norms of world outlook. A cognitive act of an individual was understood as entrance of the subject to the world of general tragic game where he is risen up from sensual forms of being to being of over-sensual beauty, which is defined only through forms of mental cognition and through beauty to over-essential being of its Creator. Philosophical thought of the Middle Ages inherited the Platonic ludological tradition. According to these notions, personal creativity of an individual (artistic, scientific etc.) was understood as being identical with cognition and perceived only as reproduction, retrieval of what had already been programmed by the Creator, that is, as a game and through the game. The brightest page of the Middle Ages is connected with chivalry and its comprehension because the phenomenon of chivalry is the top of medieval culture, its ethical and esthetical ideal, which was over-thought by its self-consciousness as a form of game. Distribution of roles covered all main manifestations of individual’s life. Therefore even usual outside manifestation of any personal emotions by an individual in his public life (happiness, satisfaction, anger, despair, sadness and so on) was subject to this “role dictate”. So, a sphere of public emotions display by an individual was also predetermined by imperativeness of his own social role he was playing. We can speak about consciousness of those times perceiving a poetic text as a played game and author art as predominantly performing art. Then constancy of plots and anonymity of works, which is a feature of medieval literature, becomes more understandable; as every author perceived it as a script and tried to play his role as best as possible; his role was written down as a corresponding    text. Moreover, we should add that a similar game was predetermined also by some other peculiarities of medieval mentality. The reason is that medieval people tried to identify themselves with a certain sample which had already had a certain approbation, to achieve full self-expression and make this self-expression understandable for the society. A role was determined and a model of behavior was built according to the admitted interpretation of this sample and its allegoric meanings (most often, there were widely known Biblical images). These established forms of self-expression made processes of understanding and interpersonal dialogue easier.


wisdom ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-145
Author(s):  
Haykazun Alvrtsyan

The article presents the perceptions and viewpoints of the Armenian medieval literary men concerning the spiritual symbol. Being anchored in the pan-Christian perception of the symbol, it laid the basis of the symbolic-allegorical thinking of the Armenian spiritual culture. In the history of the Armenian medieval literature and art studies, the analysis of symbols, in essence, the discovery of the epiphany in them, which is the fundamental meaning of the culture, have often been neglected. Today there is a necessity to analyse the spiritual culture in a new way to dig out its ideological – world outlook basis conditioned by the artistic and the festival and ritual functions of the different types of art. Such a research also enables us to comprehend the aesthetic, artistic and doctrinal - philosophical merits of the spiritual culture (literature, miniature, architecture, etc.) created throughout the centuries and still unknown to us in a new way, to review the system of criteria and ideological-methodological basis of the evaluation, which bears a great significance for the complete and precise perception and evaluation of the Armenian art and literature of the Middle Ages.


Humanities ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Murdoch

The scholarly writings of C. S. Lewis (1898–1963) have both inspired the study of the Middle Ages and confirmed the relevance to the humanities that medieval literary texts can have for the present. He was aware that the straitjacket implied by periodisation can blind us to the universal values presented in medieval literature. Qualitative assumptions made about the (usually undefined) Middle Ages include an alienating remoteness, and also a general ignorance, especially of science and technology. Lewis drew attention to the knowledge of astronomy, for example, and pointed out that medieval technical skills in architecture, agriculture and medicine are important for us to be aware about. Three medieval works illustrate this universality with respect to technical skills (the Völundarkviða); identity and the self (the Hildebrandslied); and the popular love-song (the courtly love-lyric). Lewis cautioned against pejorative terms like ‘Dark Ages’, noted problems of perspective in assessing all pre-modern literature, and showed that earlier works have a continuing value and relevance.


STUDIUM ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 13-42
Author(s):  
Daniel Añua Tejedor

Abstract Between the 12th and 15th centuries there was a theological evolution of great transcendence that shook the spiritual life of the believers. The fragmentary subdivision of the geography of the beyond conditioned directly the liturgy and the rites of the faithful in their attempt to achieve salvation after death. One of the changes affected the moment in which the judgment —which would lead to the condemnation or salvation of the Christian— would take place, specifically the proximity or distance in the time of the celebration of the same. Throughout these centuries, medieval Hispanic literature has been reflecting not only this evolution but also the search for greater effectiveness in controlling the lives of believers by ecclesiastical elites. Key words: medieval literature Final Judgment; individual judgment; Purgatory; pre mortem; post mortem   Resumen Entre los siglos xii y xv se produjo una evolución teológica de gran transcendencia que conmovió la vida espiritual de los creyentes. La subdivisión parcelaria de la geografía del más allá condicionó directamente la liturgia y los ritos de los fieles en su intento por lograr la salvación después de la muerte. Una de las modificaciones afectó al instante en el que el juicio —que conduciría a la condenación o salvación del cristiano— tendría lugar, concretamente a la proximidad o lejanía en el tiempo de la celebración del mismo. A lo largo de estos siglos, la literatura hispánica medieval ha ido reflejando no sólo esta evolución sino también la búsqueda de una mayor eficacia en el control de la vida de los creyentes por parte de las elites eclesiásticas. Palabras clave: literatura medieval, Juicio Final, juicio individual, purgatorio, pre mortem; post mortem.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document