91. Food Trough from Rubiana, New Georgia

A note on the effect of feeding regime on the performance of sows housed in a novel group-housing system

Animal Science ◽

10.1017/s0003356100032748 ◽

1989 ◽

Vol 49 (3) ◽

pp. 523-526 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

J. Carol Petherick ◽

Judith K. Blackshaw

Keyword(s):

Adverse Effects ◽

Reproductive Performance ◽

Housing System ◽

Group Housing ◽

Feeding Regime ◽

Feeding Regimes ◽

Ad Libitum ◽

Short Time ◽

Effect Of Feeding ◽

Food Trough

The effects on sow reproductive performance of three feeding regimes (ration (R), ad libitum (A) and ration + straw (R + S)), in conjunction with partial barriers placed along the food trough, were investigated. Three groups of four sows were put on the regimes, in a group-housing system, over three consecutive gestations. Each trial lasted 13 days and took place during the first half of the gestation period. Sows on A ate about three times the amount of food that was allocated to them on R and R + S (2 kg per sow per day). Feeding regime did not affect any of the measures of reproductive performance (numbers of piglets liveborn, stillborn, weaned, birth and weaning weights). Sows of parity 7 and over had significantly fewer liveborn and more stillborn piglets compared with parities 2 to 6 (P < 0·05). It is probable that no adverse effects of the feeding regimes were found due to the short time that the sows were on them and because multiparous animals were used. It is suggested that the welfare of ration-fed sows, whose appetite is not satiated, is jeopardized and that this problem may be solved by the provision of fibrous foodstuffs.

Download Full-text

Food preference of captive mona monkey (Cercopithecus mona) in University of Lagos, Nigeria

Nigerian Journal of Animal Production ◽

10.51791/njap.v47i5.1331 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 47 (5) ◽

pp. 184-191

Author(s):

F. Olaleru ◽

O. J. Babayemi

Keyword(s):

Food Preference ◽

Urban Forest ◽

Solanum Melongena ◽

Sympatric Species ◽

Food Type ◽

Fallback Foods ◽

Musa Sapientum ◽

Preferred Foods ◽

Mona Monkey ◽

Food Trough

In the wild, nonhuman primates' preferences for some food may not be quite clear due to the seasonality and utilization of fallback foods during periods of scarcity. Understanding the most preferred foods could aid schedules of serving them to captive primates. Against this background, the study was carried out to determine the food preference of captive mona monkeys offered foods consumed by their counterparts in the degraded and fragmented urban forest, biodiversity rich rainforest, and in a zoo. The feeding trials were conducted in the service area of the University of Lagos. Four adult monkeys (two males and two females) were offered weighed amounts of 13 different foods served in batches of five, using the cafeteria method. Each food type was offered separately in a food trough at 10:00 hrs each day. Left over was withdrawn and measured after 24 hours. Position of the food trough was changed every day. Water was provided ad libitum in a water trough. The difference between offered and left-over weights was regarded as intake. Food preference was determined from the coefficient of preference (COP), and a unitary value was considered preferred. In decreasing order of preference, the preferred foods that had COP ≥ 1 were Musa sapientum, Zea mays, and Solanum melongena. The mona monkey and other sympatric species held in captivity could be provided with these foods in addition to other foods that could meet their nutritional needs. Nutritional assays of these foods could provide clues to their being preferred above others. Dans la nature, les préférences des primates non humains pour certains aliments peuvent ne pas être tout à fait claires en raison de la saisonnalité et de l'utilisation des aliments de remplacement pendant les périodes de pénurie. Comprendre les aliments les plus préférés pourrait faciliter les horaires de les servir aux primates captifs. Dans ce contexte, l'étude a été menée pour estimer la préférence alimentaire des singes mona en captivité qui offraient des aliments consommés par leurs homologues dans la forêt urbaine dégradée et fragmentée, la forêt tropicale riche en biodiversité et dans un zoo. Les essais d'alimentation ont été menés dans l’aire de service de l'Université de Lagos. Quatre singes adultes (deux mâles et deux femelles) se sont vus offrir des quantités pesées de 13 aliments différents servis par lots de cinq, en utilisant la méthode de la cafétéria. Chaque type de nourriture était offert 184 séparément dans une auge à 10 h chaque jour. Le surplus a été prélevé et mesuré après 24 heures. La position de l'auge a été changée chaque jour. L'eau était fournie à volonté dans un bac à eau. La différence entre le poids offert et le poids restant a été considérée comme un apport. La préférence alimentaire a été déterminée à partir du coefficient de préférence (COP), et une valeur unitaire a été considérée comme préférée. Par ordre décroissant de préférence, les aliments préférés qui avaient un COP ≥ 1 étaient Musa sapientum, Zeamays et Solanummelongena. Le singe mona et d'autres espèces sympatriques gardées en captivité pourraient recevoir ces aliments en plus d'autres aliments qui pourraient répondre à leurs besoins nutritionnels. Les dosages nutritionnels de ces aliments pourraient fournir des indices sur leur préférence aux autres.

Download Full-text

Selection of universal peptide biomarkers for the detection of the allergen hazelnut in food trough a comprehensive, high resolution mass spectrometric (HRMS) based approach

Food Chemistry ◽

10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125679 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 309 ◽

pp. 125679 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Kaatje Van Vlierberghe ◽

Maxime Gavage ◽

Marc Dieu ◽

Patsy Renard ◽

Thierry Arnould ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Resolution ◽

Mass Spectrometric ◽

High Resolution Mass ◽

Selection Of ◽

Resolution Mass ◽

Food Trough

Download Full-text

Digestion trials with swine

The Journal of Agricultural Science ◽

10.1017/s0021859600003920 ◽

1924 ◽

Vol 14 (4) ◽

pp. 498-505 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Thomas Barlow Wood ◽

Herbert Ernest Woodman

Keyword(s):

Degree Of Freedom ◽

Freedom Of Movement ◽

Similar Work ◽

Food Trough

The carrying out of digestion experiments with swine introduces difficulties of technique which are not encountered in similar work with sheep. The pig is apt to be restive under restraint and does not always take kindly to the wearing of harness. The designing of a suitable harness is not easy on account of the shape of the pig, and when confined in a metabolism cage, the animal frequently spends much of its time rubbing vigorously against the sides, thereby considerably disarranging the harness. Moreover, since the pig increases in size so rapidly, it is necessary that the fit of the harness be capable of adjustment within wide limits. A further difficulty is connected with the voracious appetite and destructiveness of the pig, so that if the experimental ration does not satisfy the hunger of the animal, the latter will often gnaw the wooden parts of the crate and will even devour its own faeces, if the degree of freedom of movement permits it to turn round. The quantitative feeding of a pig is a matter of difficulty, owing to the animal's eagerness and its habit of stepping into the food trough. Swine do not display such hardiness under confinement as do sheep, and it is therefore necessary to maintain an equable temperature in the metabolism room throughout the experiments.

Download Full-text

The effect of mixing unfamiliar individuals on the growth and production of finishing pigs

Animal Science ◽

10.1017/s0003356100005845 ◽

1991 ◽

Vol 52 (1) ◽

pp. 201-206 ◽

Cited By ~ 43

Author(s):

S. S. L. Tan ◽

D. M. Shackleton ◽

R. M. Beames

Keyword(s):

Live Weight ◽

Experimental Period ◽

Finishing Pigs ◽

Economic Returns ◽

Weight Gains ◽

Negative Effect ◽

Short And Long Term ◽

Mixed Groups ◽

Food Trough

ABSTRACTThe effect on productivity of mixing finishing pigs from different litters was studied. Two hundred and ten Yorkshire × Landrace pigs of about 76 kg were assigned in groups of six to each of four treatments. In treatment 1, pigs were retained as unmixed littermates while in treatments 2 and 3, three pigs from one litter were mixed with three pigs from another litter. Additionally pigs in treatment 3 were injected with a tranquilizer prior to mixing. In treatment 4, groups of five littermates were introduced into the pen of either a lighter weight or heavier weight pig. All groups were housed in 6·65 m2 partially slatted pens and fed from a communal food trough.Besides promoting aggression and fighting, mixing significantly depressed productivity, and both short-and long-term economic returns. Over the 3-week experimental period the proportional live-weight gains observed in the unmixed pigs over those of the mixed groups, were substantial: 0·099 over the 3: 3 mixed groups, 0·141 over the tranquilizer-treated groups, and 0·127 over the 5: 1 mixed groups. Consequently, mixing would necessitate additional inputs of food, housing, and labour because of the increased days to market.The tranquilizer not only did not eliminate fighting but had a long-term negative effect on production and was thus a contra-indicated expense. Introducing a single pig into a group in an occupied pen also lowered production, as did moving without mixing. However, moving effects were short lived and had minimal negative influences on overall productivity.

Download Full-text