Archeological Resource Protection. Sherry Hutt, Elwood W. Jones and Martin E. McAllister Preservation Press, National Trust for Historic Preservation, Washington D.C., 1992. 179 pp.,illustrations, appendixes, glossary, bibliography, index. $19.95 (paper). - Interpreting the Past: Research with Public Participation. Louann Jacobson and June-El Piper, editors. Cultural Resources Series No. 10. New Mexico Bureau of Land Management, Santa Fe, 1992. ix + 98 pp., figures, tables, references cited. $6.00 (paper).

1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-179
Author(s):  
Lee Kreutzer
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Schlanger ◽  
George MacDonell ◽  
Signa Larralde ◽  
Martin Stein

AbstractIn 2008, the Carlsbad Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) made a fundamental change in how they work with the energy industry in the Permian Basin of southeastern New Mexico, one of the nation's busiest “oil patches.” Through a collaborative effort that involved the Bureau of Land Management, the New Mexico State Historic Preservation Officer, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the Mescalero Apache Tribe, and industry representatives, they developed and implemented the Permian Basin Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). This agreement allows energy development proponents to contribute funds to archaeological research in lieu of spending an equivalent amount of money on traditional archaeological field survey. The mitigation program governs how BLM addresses long-term damage and cumulative impacts to archaeological resources as new development proceeds in the Permian Basin MOA area. Now in its fifth year, the program has succeeded in key ways: industry has gained control over schedules and time, while archaeologists have gained control over where and how they do archaeology. Key lessons have been learned along the way: The funding mechanisms of the program work well, but doing archaeology through a collaborative working group takes a lot of time and energy.


1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.D. Sanchez ◽  
S. B. Bartsch-Winkler ◽  
R.R. Tidball ◽  
V.L. Clark

Collections ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 155019062095153
Author(s):  
Diana M. Barg ◽  
Emily S. Palus

The U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is steward to vast cultural resources across public lands and in museum collections. Like other land-managing agencies, its resource protection strategy includes Federal enforcement of cultural property laws. Between 2007 and 2013, a case code-named Operation: Cerberus Action recovered more than 100,000 objects, mainly consisting of artifacts from the American Southwest, through undercover operations, evidence gathering, seizure, and forfeiture. Prized by collectors and stockpiled as part of illicit ventures, most of the artifacts have little-to-no provenience. To address the immense quantity of material and best meet the public interest, the BLM developed a decision-tree with criteria to determine appropriate disposition options. This process involved three intensive phases: (1) identification; (2) return or repatriation; and (3) assessment of the remaining items to inform disposition based on specific criteria. In this third phase, artifacts are categorized for curation, education, conveyance to tribes beyond the scope of NAGPRA, another public use, or ultimately, destruction. This paper summarizes the case, addresses the legal foundations for determining ownership, presents the significance criteria for disposition, and concludes with a reflection on the opportunities and challenges of this endeavor, which may guide similar efforts in the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document