Time, Human Agency, and Social Change: Perspectives on the Life Course

1994 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen H. Elder Jr.
1990 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 843-844
Author(s):  
Johannes J. Huinink

1988 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 400
Author(s):  
Denise D. Bielby ◽  
Gaynor Cohen

Author(s):  
Dan Woodman ◽  
Clarence M. Batan ◽  
Oki Rahadianto Sutopo

This chapter interrogates and develops one of the major conceptual traditions for thinking about social change as it intersects with youth and the life course: the sociology of generations. Grounded in an overview of how the notion of generations is used in two Southeast Asian contexts, Indonesia and the Philippines, it develops an alternative concept of generation, emphasizing intergenerational relationships, the impact of youth on the life course, the continuing impact of history and the refiguring of long-standing inequalities in the context of rapid change. An orientation to generations is limited if it is only used to illustrate change across groups within countries, but not new connections across borders. However, the opposite is also a limitation, too easily slipping into claims of a homogenous global generation. A global sociology of generations needs simultaneously to be aware of these differences and similarities that are in a constant state of flux.


1989 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 533
Author(s):  
Roy H. Rodgers ◽  
Gaynor Cohen

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip L. Hammack ◽  
David M. Frost ◽  
Ilan H. Meyer ◽  
David R. Pletta

Social Forces ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 520
Author(s):  
Novella Perrin ◽  
Gaynor Cohen

1992 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Titterton

ABSTRACTThis article argues that dominant paradigms in the study of social welfare have neglected the role of creative human agency in responding differentially to threats of welfare across the lifespan. This is due to the preference for unitary categories of analysis which place vulnerable individuals into homogenous groupings and to the tendency to work with limited models of vulnerability and helpseeking. These paradigms are further characterised by a preoccupation with pathological views of health and welfare and by inadequate conceptualisations of mediating factors and coping across the life course. A new paradigm of welfare is called for, the focus of which would be on the differential nature of vulnerability and risk among individuals and their differentiated reactions to threats to welfare. Directions for empirical research within such a paradigm are outlined.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document