Fish, Amphibian and Reptile Remains From Archaeological Sites, Part I: Southeastern and Southwestern United States. Stanley J. Olsen. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 56, No. 2, Cambridge, 1968. xviii + 137 pp., 86 figs., 2 pis., appendix. $4.85.

1971 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-122
Author(s):  
Charles L. Douglas
1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Kent

Despite the importance attributed to the study of storage behavior, little research has been conducted to determine whether it is even possible to distinguish storage áreas from refuse áreas. Archaeologists routinely separate storage pits from trash pits, but few have systematically investigated the defining characteristics of each. This study suggests that there is an archaeologically visible signature that can help researchers correctly interpret these loci. Research at occupied and recently abandoned camps among the now sedentary residents of Kutse in the Kalahari Desert of Botswana shows that refuse areas have a more homogeneous artifact inventory, regardless of the number of objects present. In contrast, non-trash activity areas at the same camps have a more heterogeneous, or diverse, inventory. The applicability and utility of this finding to the archaeological record is evaluated through the analysis of a Pueblo II Anasazi archaeological site from the southwestern United States. Patterns first recognized ethnoarchaeologically also appear to be recognizable in the archaeological record using the same methods. The results indicate that the statistical tests described here are applicable to distinguishing trash from other activity areas at archaeological sites.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document