On elementary embeddings from an inner model to the universe

2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 1090-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Vickers ◽  
P. D. Welch
Keyword(s):  
Measurable Cardinal ◽  
Negative Answer ◽  
Core Model ◽  
Elementary Embedding ◽  
Proper Class ◽  
The Core ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Elementary Embeddings ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Closure Assumption

AbstractWe consider the following question of Kunen:Does Con(ZFC + ∃M a transitive inner model and a non-trivial elementary embedding j: M → V)imply Con(ZFC + ∃ a measurable cardinal)?We use core model theory to investigate consequences of the existence of such a j: M → V. We prove, amongst other things, the existence of such an embedding implies that the core model K is a model of “there exists a proper class of almost Ramsey cardinals”. Conversely, if On is Ramsey, then such a j. M are definable.We construe this as a negative answer to the question above. We consider further the consequences of strengthening the closure assumption on j to having various classes of fixed points.

Co-critical points of elementary embeddings

1985 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 220-226
Author(s):  
Michael Sheard
Keyword(s):  
Critical Point ◽  
Measurable Cardinal ◽  
Elementary Embedding ◽  
Proper Class ◽  
Ground Model ◽  
Target Model ◽  
Inner Models ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Elementary Embeddings

Probably the two most famous examples of elementary embeddings between inner models of set theory are the embeddings of the universe into an inner model given by a measurable cardinal and the embeddings of the constructible universeLinto itself given by 0#. In both of these examples, the “target model” is a subclass of the “ground model” (and in the latter case they are equal). It is not hard to find examples of embeddings in which the target model is not a subclass of the ground model: ifis a generic ultrafilter arising from forcing with a precipitous ideal on a successor cardinalκ, then the ultraproduct of the ground model viacollapsesκ. Such considerations suggest a classification of how close the target model comes to “fitting inside” the ground model.Definition 1.1. LetMandNbe inner models (transitive, proper class models) of ZFC, and letj:M→Nbe an elementary embedding. Theco-critical pointofjis the least ordinalλ, if any exist, such that there isX⊆λ, X∈NbutX∉M. Such anXis called anew subsetofλ.It is easy to see that the co-critical point ofj:M→Nis a cardinal inN.

On P-points over a measurable cardinal

1981 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-66
Author(s):  
A. Kanamori
Keyword(s):  
Measurable Cardinal ◽  
Focus Of Attention ◽  
Large Cardinal ◽  
Elementary Embedding ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Measurable Cardinals ◽  
The Universe

This paper continues the study of κ-ultrafilters over a measurable cardinal κ, following the sequence of papers Ketonen [2], Kanamori [1] and Menas [4]. Much of the concern will be with p-point κ-ultrafilters, which have become a focus of attention because they epitomize situations of further complexity beyond the better understood cases, normal and product κ-ultrafilters.For any κ-ultrafilter D, let iD: V → MD ≃ Vκ/D be the elementary embedding of the universe into the transitization of the ultrapower by D. Situations of U < RKD will be exhibited when iU(κ) < iD(κ), and when iU(κ) = iD(κ). The main result will then be that if the latter case obtains, then there is an inner model with two measurable cardinals. (As will be pointed out, this formulation is due to Kunen, and improves on an earlier version of the author.) Incidentally, a similar conclusion will also follow from the assertion that there is an ascending Rudin-Keisler chain of κ-ultrafilters of length ω + 1. The interest in these results lies in the derivability of a substantial large cardinal assertion from plausible hypotheses on κ-ultrafilters.

Strongly compact cardinals, elementary embeddings and fixed points

1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 808-812
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Abe
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Points ◽  
Elementary Embedding ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Power Set ◽  
Elementary Embeddings ◽  
Basic Facts ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Normal Ultrafilter ◽  
Strongly Compact Cardinals

J. Barbanel [1] characterized the class of cardinals fixed by an elementary embedding induced by a normal ultrafilter on Pκλ assuming that κ is supercompact. In this paper we shall prove the same results from the weaker hypothesis that κ is strongly compact and the ultrafilter is fine.We work in ZFC throughout. Our set-theoretic notation is quite standard. In particular, if X is a set, ∣X∣ denotes the cardinality of X and P(X) denotes the power set of X. Greek letters will denote ordinals. In particular γ, κ, η and γ will denote cardinals. If κ and λ are cardinals, then λ<κ is defined to be supγ<κγγ. Cardinal exponentiation is always associated from the top. Thus, for example, 2λ<κ means 2(λ<κ). V denotes the universe of all sets. If M is an inner model of ZFC, ∣X∣M and P(X)M denote the cardinality of X in M and the power set of X in M respectively.We review the basic facts on fine ultrafilters and the corresponding elementary embeddings. (For detail, see [2].)Definition. Assume κ and λ are cardinals with κ ≤ λ. Then, Pκλ = {X ⊂ λ∣∣X∣ < κ}.It is important to note that ∣Pκλ∣ = λ< κ.

The consistency strength of the free-subset property for ωω

1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1198-1204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Koepke
Keyword(s):  
Measurable Cardinal ◽  
Core Model ◽  
Reverse Direction ◽  
Ground Model ◽  
Consistency Strength ◽  
The Core ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Free Subset ◽  
Coherent Sequence ◽  
Measurable Cardinals

A subset X of a structure S is called free in S if ∀x ∈ Xx ∉ S[X − {x}]; here, S[Y] is the substructure of S generated from Y by the functions of S. For κ, λ, μ cardinals, let Frμ(κ, λ) be the assertion:for every structure S with κ ⊂ S which has at most μ functions and relations there is a subset X ⊂ κ free in S of cardinality ≥ λ.We show that Frω(ωω, ω), the free-subset property for ωω, is equiconsistent with the existence of a measurable cardinal (2.2,4.4). This answers a question of Devlin [De].In the first section of this paper we prove some combinatorial facts about Frμ(κ, λ); in particular the first cardinal κ such that Frω(κ, ω) is weakly inaccessible or of cofinality ω (1.2). The second section shows that, under Frω(ωω, ω), ωω is measurable in an inner model. For the convenience of readers not acquainted with the core model κ, we first deduce the existence of 0# (2.1) using the inner model L. Then we adapt the proof to the core model and obtain that ωω is measurable in an inner model. For the reverse direction, we essentially apply a construction of Shelah [Sh] who forced Frω(ωω, ω) over a ground model which contains an ω-sequence of measurable cardinals. We show in §4 that indeed a coherent sequence of Ramsey cardinals suffices. In §3 we obtain such a sequence as an endsegment of a Prikry sequence.

Ramsey cardinals, α-Erdös cardinals, and the core model

1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-114
Author(s):  
Dirk R. H. Schlingmann
Keyword(s):  
Measurable Cardinal ◽  
Core Model ◽  
The Core ◽  
Transitive Model ◽  
Normal Measure ◽  
Inner Model

The core model K was introduced by R. B. Jensen and A. J. Dodd [DoJ]. K is the union of Gödel's constructible universe L together with all mice, i.e., , and K is a transitive model of ZFC + (V = K) + GCH (see [DoJ]). V = K is consistent with the existence of Ramsey cardinals [M], and if cf(α) > ω, V = K is consistent with the existence of α-Erdös cardinals [J]. Let K be Ramsey. Then there is a smallest inner model Wκ of ZFC in which κ is Ramsey. We have Wκ ⊨ V = K and Wκ ⊆ K [M]. The existence of Wκ with is equivalent to the existence of a sharplike mouse on N ⊨ K with N ⊨ κ Ramsey. (A mouse N on is called sharplike provided .) We have , where is the mouse iteration of N. N is the oleast mouse not in Wκ (see [J] and [DJKo]). Here < denotes the mouse order. The context always clarifies whether the mouse order or the usual <-relation is meant.The main result of §1 is that Wκ ⊨ κ is the only Ramsey cardinal. A similar result has been found true in the smallest inner model L[U] of ZFC + “κ is measurable” if U is a normal measure on κ: L[U] ⊨ κ is the only measurable cardinal [Ku].

scholarly journals Ramsey-like cardinals II

2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 541-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Gitman ◽  
P. D. Welch
Keyword(s):  
Upper Bound ◽  
Large Cardinals ◽  
Large Cardinal ◽  
Core Model ◽  
Consistency Strength ◽  
The Core ◽  
Countable Ordinal ◽  
Elementary Embeddings ◽  
Remarkable Cardinals

AbstractThis paper continues the study of the Ramsey-like large cardinals introduced in [5] and [14]. Ramsey-like cardinals are defined by generalizing the characterization of Ramsey cardinals via the existence of elementary embeddings. Ultrafilters derived from such embeddings are fully iterable and so it is natural to ask about large cardinal notions asserting the existence of ultrafilters allowing only α-many iterations for some countable ordinal α. Here we study such α-iterable cardinals. We show that the α-iterable cardinals form a strict hierarchy for α ≤ ω1, that they are downward absolute to L for , and that the consistency strength of Schindler's remarkable cardinals is strictly between 1-iterable and 2-iterable cardinals.We show that the strongly Ramsey and super Ramsey cardinals from [5] are downward absolute to the core model K. Finally, we use a forcing argument from a strongly Ramsey cardinal to separate the notions of Ramsey and virtually Ramsey cardinals. These were introduced in [14] as an upper bound on the consistency strength of the Intermediate Chang's Conjecture.

THE SOLIDITY AND NONSOLIDITY OF INITIAL SEGMENTS OF THE CORE MODEL

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 920-938
Author(s):  
GUNTER FUCHS ◽  
RALF SCHINDLER
Keyword(s):  
Core Model ◽  
Solid Core ◽  
The Core ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Cohen Real ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

AbstractIt is shown that $K|{\omega _1}$ need not be solid in the sense previously introduced by the authors: it is consistent that there is no inner model with a Woodin cardinal yet there is an inner model W and a Cohen real x over W such that $K|{\omega _1}\,\, \in \,\,W[x] \setminus W$. However, if ${0^{\rm{\P}}}$ does not exist and $\kappa \ge {\omega _2}$ is a cardinal, then $K|\kappa$ is solid. We draw the conclusion that solidity is not forcing absolute in general, and that under the assumption of $\neg {0^{\rm{\P}}}$, the core model is contained in the solid core, previously introduced by the authors.It is also shown, assuming ${0^{\rm{\P}}}$ does not exist, that if there is a forcing that preserves ${\omega _1}$, forces that every real has a sharp, and increases $\delta _2^1$, then ${\omega _1}$ is measurable in K.

KWithout the Measurable

2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 708-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Jensen ◽  
John Steel
Keyword(s):  
Core Model ◽  
Proper Class ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

AbstractWe show in ZFC that if there is no proper class inner model with a Woodin cardinal, then there is an absolutely definablecore modelthat is close toVin various ways.

Elementary embeddings and infinitary combinatorics

1971 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 407-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Kunen
Keyword(s):  
Measurable Cardinal ◽  
Large Cardinal ◽  
Elementary Embeddings ◽  
The Universe

One of the standard ways of postulating large cardinal axioms is to consider elementary embeddings,j, from the universe,V, into some transitive submodel,M. See Reinhardt–Solovay [7] for more details. Ifjis not the identity, andκis the first ordinal moved byj, thenκis a measurable cardinal. Conversely, Scott [8] showed that wheneverκis measurable, there is suchjandM. If we had assumed, in addition, that, thenκwould be theκth measurable cardinal; in general, the wider we assumeMto be, the largerκmust be.

Nonabsoluteness of elementary embeddings

1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 774-778
Author(s):  
Friedrich Wehrung
Keyword(s):  
Measurable Cardinal ◽  
Elementary Embedding ◽  
Minimal Support ◽  
Elementary Embeddings ◽  
Measurable Cardinals

Ifκis a measurable cardinal, let us say that a measure onκis aκ-complete nonprincipal ultrafilter onκ. IfUis a measure onκ, letjUbe the canonical elementary embedding ofVinto its Ultrapower UltU(V). Ifxis a set, say thatUmovesxwhenjU(x)≠x; say thatκmovesxwhen some measure onκmovesx. Recall Kunen's lemma (see [K]): “Every ordinal is moved only by finitely many measurable cardinals.” Kunen's proof (see [K]) and Fleissner's proof (see [KM, III, §10]) are essentially nonconstructive.The following proposition can be proved by using elementary facts about iterated ultrapowers.Proposition.Let ‹Un: n ∈ ω› be a sequence of measures on a strictly increasing sequence ‹κn: n ∈ ω› of measurable cardinals. Let U = ‹ Wα: α < ω2›, where Wωm + n= Um(m, n ∈ ω). Then, for each θ inUltU(V),if E is the (minimal) support of θ inUltU(V),then, for all m ∈ ω, Ummoves θ iff E ∩ [ωm, ω(m + 1))≠ ∅.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document