Patarata Pottery: Classic Period Ceramics of the South- Central Gulf Coast, Veracruz, Mexico. Barbara L. Stark. Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona No. 51. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1989. xii + 205 pp., figures, tables, appendixes, references, index, abstract (English and Spanish). $29.95 (paper).

1992 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-180
Author(s):  
Susan T. Goodfellow
1943 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emil W. Haury

The Papago Indian Reservation, touching the Mexican border in south-central Arizona, has been the scene of anthropological work by the Department of Anthropology of the University of Arizona and the Arizona State Museum during the past four years. One branch of this general study has been archaeological, consisting of reconnaissance and of excavation in what were considered to be key sites. Beyond Gila Pueblo's limited survey in Papagueria, next to nothing was known about it. The environment is harsh and arid, and scanty surface water limits agricultural possibilities. Yet more than 5000 Papago Indians somehow manage, as they have for centuries, to make a comfortable if simple living in the area. Certainly the life there today is nothing new and it is a fair conclusion that, although inhospitable, the area should furnish a fairly rich archaeological picture. As our work proceeded it became evident that there were ruins in abundance. With few exceptions, these were small and the occupation thinly spread. Occasionally, a large site with sizable trash mounds gave promise of stratigraphy.


1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara L. Stark ◽  
Lynette Heller ◽  
Michael D. Glascock ◽  
J. Michael Elam ◽  
Hector Neff

Neutron activation and statistical analyses establish source ascriptions for 201 obsidian artifacts representing Preclassic, Classic, and Postclassic period contexts in the Gulf Coast region of Mexico. Zaragoza-Oyameles, Puebla, and Pico de Orizaba, Veracruz, are the most common sources, but procurement patterns and technology shifted during the archaeological sequence. Comparative information is discussed for all periods, but especially the distribution of Zaragoza-Oyameles obsidian in the Classic period is examined. The distribution network for this obsidian served several regions. The importance of long-distance obsidian distribution for Teotihuacán is called into question.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document