The U.S. Navy and the Origins of the Military-Industrial Complex, 1847-1883

2001 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 1093
Author(s):  
Robert G. Angevine ◽  
Kurt Hackenmer
Keyword(s):  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Military Industrial Complex ◽  
The Military ◽  
The U.S

Introduction

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas I. Faith
Keyword(s):  
World War I ◽  
Chemical Warfare ◽  
Public Image ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Institutional History ◽  
World War ◽  
Military Industrial Complex ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Military ◽  
The U.S

This book documents the institutional history of the Chemical Warfare Service (CWS), the U.S. Army organization responsible for chemical warfare, from its origins in 1917 through Amos A. Fries's departure as CWS chief in 1929. It examines the U.S. chemical warfare program as it developed before the nation began sending soldiers to fight in France during World War I; the American Expeditionary Force's experiences with poison gas on the Western Front; the CWS's struggle to continue its chemical weapons program in a hostile political environment after the war; and CWS efforts to improve its public image as well as its reputation in the military in the first half of the 1920s. The book concludes with an assessment of the CWS's successes and failures in the second half of the 1920s. Through the story of the CWS, the book shows how the autonomy of the military-industrial complex can be limited when policymakers are confronted with pervasive, hostile public opinion.

Thermonuclear Gardens: Information Artworks about the U.S. Military-Industrial Complex

Leonardo ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila Pinkel
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Industry ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Military Industrial Complex ◽  
International Data ◽  
The Military ◽  
The U.S ◽  
Over Time

The author traces the evolution of her installations about the military-industrial complex during the 1980s and early 1990s and artworks that emerged as a result of her research. In addition to national and international data, maps, graphs and statistics about the industry, the author over time progressively added regional, site-specific information in order to empower viewers. The process of creating these works revealed the place of the nuclear industry in the author's own family, which ultimately facilitated the design of later installations.

The 21st-Century Turn to Culture: American Exceptionalism

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 794-796
Author(s):  
Rochelle Davis
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Differences ◽  
21St Century ◽  
American Exceptionalism ◽  
Cultural Knowledge ◽  
Military Force ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Military Industrial Complex ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Military ◽  
The U.S

The U.S. Military's turn to culture in the 21st century occurred largely because of its inability to achieve its stated objectives in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through conventional military force. Building on a long history of military strategies concerned with the cultural differences of others, the U.S. military crafted a warfighting strategy in 2006 based on a counterinsurgency (COIN) doctrine of using cultural knowledge to battle the enemy. Charting how and why culture was embraced as a 21st-century “weapons system” shows us how technopolitical systems inside the military-industrial complex are envisioned, built, and then dismantled. Close tracking of these changing 21st-century strategies of war reveals, deep within the counterterrorism discourse, a fundamental belief in American exceptionalism. The principle that emerged from this ideological environment is that the enemies to be fought are not only terrorists or the ideologues of al-Qaʿida but also the countries and cultures that produced them. The implementation of this principle, despite its obvious failures, reveals the ideological underpinning that has justified the incredible destruction and securitized implementation of warfighting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document