Republic of Letters: The American Intellectual Community, 1776-1865

2000 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 1739
Author(s):  
Philip Gould ◽  
Gilman M. Ostrander
2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 735
Author(s):  
Michael C. Batinski ◽  
Gilman M. Ostrander

2000 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 1026
Author(s):  
Peter S. Field ◽  
Gilman M. Ostrander

1978 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Crawford

When William Ferguson, an English botanist and entomologist, called at the Detroit home of General Lewis Cass in June 1855, it was natural that during “ a very lengthened and interesting conversation,” the veteran American politician should mention “ the absurd books ” written by British travellers about the United States. “ They come over here,” said Cass, “ run over the country for three months, and think they understand it.” Such sentiments, of course, were commonplace by this time and Ferguson could not have been surprised by the frankness with which they were elucidated. Cass had reached political maturity during a period in which the British traveller became the focus for intense and hostile speculation in the United States. There was no more appropriate target for Jacksonian wrath, for example, than Mrs. Frances Trollope. Her Domestic Manners of the Americans, published in 1832 and widely extracted in American newspapers, helped give broad popular legitimacy to the bitter critical dialogues which pervaded the Anglo-American intellectual community after 1815. During the Jacksonian period, therefore, the British traveller could claim an important role in the development of Atlantic perceptions and attitudes.


2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (1/2) ◽  
pp. 281-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prisca Augustyn

Thomas Sebeok attributed it to what he called the ‘wretched’ translation of Uexküll’s Theoretische Biologie (1920) that the notion of Umwelt did not reach the Anglo-American intellectual community much earlier. There is no doubt that making more of Uexküll’s Umweltlehre available in English will not only further the biosemiotic movement, but also fill a gap in the foundational theoretical canon of semiotics in general. The purpose of this paper is to address issues of terminology and theory translation between Uexküll’s Umweltlehre and current biosemiotics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document