China's nuclear weapons strategy: tradition within evolution and The future of Asian-Pacific security collaboration

1989 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 761-762
Author(s):  
Gerald Segal
1960 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Freeman J. Dyson

2005 ◽  
Vol 87 (859) ◽  
pp. 497-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Wirz ◽  
Emmanuel Egger

AbstractThere is great concern that terrorists could obtain nuclear or radiological weapons and detonate them in a large city. The authors analyse the technical requirements for and obstacles to obtaining such weapons. What difficulties would have to be surmounted? Could these problems be solved by a terrorist organization without direct support from a State possessing nuclear weapons? The authors conclude that nuclear weapons are most likely out of reach for terrorists. However, radiological weapons may well be used by terrorists in the future. The possible consequences of such an attack are discussed.


2021 ◽  
pp. 162-200
Author(s):  
Michael E. O’Hanlon

This chapter delves much deeper into three areas — nuclear weapons, space and satellites, and missile defense. It argues that these are among the subjects in military technology that are both simple enough to be accessible to the generalist, and important and enduring enough that they can be expected to remain relevant for policymakers well into the future. The chapter also discusses the significance of space and its purposes for military activities, noting the basic principles of the national security space subject are grounded in immutable principles of physics. It examines the approach used in the study which suggests a methodology for diving deeper into other key areas of defense technology. Ultimately, the chapter contends that constructing adequate defenses, stable military balances of power, and robust means of national protection is fated to be a very difficult undertaking. To put it bluntly, two opposing countries or blocs of nations with roughly comparable military capabilities are generally not inherently safe from each other.


Daedalus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 149 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-83
Author(s):  
Brad Roberts

Since the end of the Cold War, changes to the practice of nuclear deterrence by the United States have been pursued as part of a comprehensive approach aimed at reducing nuclear risks. These changes have included steps to reduce reliance on nuclear weapons in U.S. defense and deterrence strategies. Looking to the future, the United States can do more, but only if the conditions are right. Policy-makers must avoid steps that have superficial appeal but would actually result in a net increase in nuclear risk. These include steps that make U.S. nuclear deterrence unreliable for the problems for which it remains relevant.


Physics Today ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 55-57
Author(s):  
D. C. Gompert ◽  
M. Mandelbaum ◽  
R. L. Garwin ◽  
J. H. Barton ◽  
Sidney D. Drell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document