Successive weakly compact or singular cardinals

1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf-Dieter Schindler
Keyword(s):  
Core Model ◽  
Weakly Compact ◽  
The Core ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Singular Cardinals ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

AbstractIt is shown in ZF that if δ < δ+ < Ω are such that δ and δ+ are either both weakly compact or singular cardinals and Ω is large enough for putting the core model apparatus into action then there is an inner model with a Woodin cardinal.

THE SOLIDITY AND NONSOLIDITY OF INITIAL SEGMENTS OF THE CORE MODEL

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 920-938
Author(s):  
GUNTER FUCHS ◽  
RALF SCHINDLER
Keyword(s):  
Core Model ◽  
Solid Core ◽  
The Core ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Cohen Real ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

AbstractIt is shown that $K|{\omega _1}$ need not be solid in the sense previously introduced by the authors: it is consistent that there is no inner model with a Woodin cardinal yet there is an inner model W and a Cohen real x over W such that $K|{\omega _1}\,\, \in \,\,W[x] \setminus W$. However, if ${0^{\rm{\P}}}$ does not exist and $\kappa \ge {\omega _2}$ is a cardinal, then $K|\kappa$ is solid. We draw the conclusion that solidity is not forcing absolute in general, and that under the assumption of $\neg {0^{\rm{\P}}}$, the core model is contained in the solid core, previously introduced by the authors.It is also shown, assuming ${0^{\rm{\P}}}$ does not exist, that if there is a forcing that preserves ${\omega _1}$, forces that every real has a sharp, and increases $\delta _2^1$, then ${\omega _1}$ is measurable in K.

scholarly journals Diagonal Prikry extensions

2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 1383-1402 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Cummings ◽  
Matthew Foreman
Keyword(s):  
Model Theory ◽  
Measurable Cardinal ◽  
Core Model ◽  
Singular Cardinal ◽  
Inner Model Theory ◽  
Regular Cardinals ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Singular Cardinals ◽  
Free Abelian Groups ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

§1. Introduction. It is a well-known phenomenon in set theory that problems in infinite combinatorics involving singular cardinals and their successors tend to be harder than the parallel problems for regular cardinals. Examples include the behaviour of cardinal exponentiation, the extent of the tree property, the extent of stationary reflection, and the existence of non-free almost-free abelian groups. The explanation for this phenomenon lies in inner model theory, in particular core models and covering lemmas. If W is an inner model of V then1. W strongly covers V if every uncountable set of ordinals is covered by a set of the same V -cardinality lying in W.2. W weakly covers V if W computes the successor of every V-singular cardinal correctly.Strong covering implies weak covering.In inner model theory there are many theorems of the general form “if there is no inner model of large cardinal hypothesis X then there is an L-like inner model Kx which Y covers V”. Here the L-like properties of Kx always include GCH and Global Square. Examples include1. X is “0# exists”, Kx is L, Y is “strongly”.2. X is “there is a measurable cardinal”, Kx is the Dodd-Jensen core model, Y is “strongly”.3. X is “there is a Woodin cardinal”, Kx is the core model for a Woodin cardinal, Y is “weakly”.

scholarly journals Jónsson cardinals, Erdős cardinals, and the core model

1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 1065-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. J. Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Minimal Model ◽  
Independent Interest ◽  
Core Model ◽  
Generic Extension ◽  
The Core ◽  
Steel Core ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Jonsson Cardinals ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

AbstractWe show that if there is no inner model with a Woodin cardinal and the Steel core model K exists, then every Jónsson cardinal is Ramsey in K, and every δ-Jónsson cardinal is δ5-Erdős in K.In the absence of the Steel core model K we prove the same conclusion for any model L[] such that either V = L[] is the minimal model for a Woodin cardinal, or there is no inner model with a Woodin cardinal and V is a generic extension of L[].The proof includes one lemma of independent interest: If V = L[A], where A ⊂ κ and κ is regular, then Lκ[A] is a Jónsson algebra. The proof of this result. Lemma 2.5, is very short and entirely elementary.

KWithout the Measurable

2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 708-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Jensen ◽  
John Steel
Keyword(s):  
Core Model ◽  
Proper Class ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

AbstractWe show in ZFC that if there is no proper class inner model with a Woodin cardinal, then there is an absolutely definablecore modelthat is close toVin various ways.

A finite family weak square principle

1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 1087-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest Schimmerling
Keyword(s):  
Finite Family ◽  
Core Model ◽  
Proved Theorem ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Square Principles ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Woodin Cardinal ◽  
Global Principle ◽  
Small Building ◽  
Weak Square

Definition 1.1. Suppose that λ ≤ κ are cardinals and Γ is a subset of (κ, κ+). By , we mean the principle asserting that there is a sequence 〈Fν | ν ∈ lim(Γ)〉 such that for every ν ∈ lim(Γ), the following hold.(1) 1 ≤ card(Fν) < λ.(2) The following hold for every C ∈ Fν.(a) C ⊆ ν ∩ Γ,(b) C is club in ν,(c) o.t.(C) ≤ κ,By we mean . If Γ = (κ, κ+), then we write for and for .These weak square principles were introduced in [Sch2, 5.1]. They generalize Jensen's principles □κ and , which are equivalent to and respectively. Jensen's global □ principle implies □κ for all κ.Theorem 1.2. Suppose that is a core model. Assume that every countable premouse M which elementarily embeds into a level of is (ω1 + 1)-iterable. Then, for every κ, holds in .The minimal non-1-small mouse is essentially a sharp for an inner model with a Woodin cardinal. We originally proved Theorem 1.2 under the assumption that is 1-small, building on [MiSt] and [Sch2]. Some generalizations followed by combining our methods with those of [St2] and [SchSt2]. (For example, the tame countably certified core model Kc satisfies .) In order to eliminate the smallness assumption all together, one replaces our use of the Dodd-Jensen lemma in proofs of condensation properties for with the weak Dodd-Jensen lemma of [NSt].

Ernest Schimmerling. Covering properties of core models. Sets and proofs. (Leeds, 1997), London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 258. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, pp. 281–299. - Peter Koepke. An introduction to extenders and core models for extender sequences. Logic Colloquium '87 (Granada, 1987), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics 129. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989, pp. 137–182. - William J. Mitchell. The core model up to a Woodin cardinal. Logic, methodology and philosophy of science, IX (Uppsala, 1991), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics 134, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 157–175. - Benedikt Löwe and John R. Steel. An introduction to core model theory. Sets and proofs (Leeds, 1997), London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 258, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, pp. 103–157. - John R. Steel. Inner models with many Woodin cardinals. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 65 no. 2 (1993), pp. 185–209. - Ernest Schimmerling. Combinatorial principles in the core model for one Woodin cardinal. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 74 no. 2 (1995), pp. 153–201. - Philip D. Welch. Some remarks on the maximality of inner models. Logic Colloquium '98 (Prague, 1998), Lecture Notes in Logic 13, Association of Symbolic Logic, Urbana, Illinois, 2000, pp. 516–540.

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 583-588
Author(s):  
Martin Zeman
Keyword(s):  
London Mathematical Society ◽  
Lecture Note ◽  
Mathematical Society ◽  
Core Model ◽  
Foundations Of Mathematics ◽  
Cambridge University ◽  
Applied Logic ◽  
The Core ◽  
Lecture Note Series ◽  
Woodin Cardinal

The complexity of the core model

1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1393-1398
Author(s):  
William J. Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Core Model ◽  
Boolean Combination ◽  
The Core ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Measurable Cardinals

AbstractIf there is no inner model with a cardinal κ such that ο(κ) = κ++ then the set K ∩ Hω1 is definable over Hω1 by a Δ4 formula, and the set of countable initial segments of the core model is definable over Hω1 by a Π3 formula. We show that if there is an inner model with infinitely many measurable cardinals then there is a model in which is not definable Σ3 by any Σ3 formula, and K ∩ Hω1 is not definable by any boolean combination of Σ3 formulas.

Countable unions of simple sets in the core model

1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 293-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. D. Welch
Keyword(s):  
Core Model ◽  
Countable Union ◽  
Skolem Function ◽  
The Core ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Type Property ◽  
Simple Sets

AbstractWe follow [8] in asking when a set of ordinals X ⊆ α is a countable union of sets in K, the core model. We show that, analogously to L, an X closed under the canonical Σ1 Skolem function for Kα can be so decomposed provided K is such that no ω-closed filters are put on its measure sequence, but not otherwise. This proviso holds if there is no inner model of a weak Erdős-type property.

The consistency strength of the free-subset property for ωω

1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1198-1204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Koepke
Keyword(s):  
Measurable Cardinal ◽  
Core Model ◽  
Reverse Direction ◽  
Ground Model ◽  
Consistency Strength ◽  
The Core ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Free Subset ◽  
Coherent Sequence ◽  
Measurable Cardinals

A subset X of a structure S is called free in S if ∀x ∈ Xx ∉ S[X − {x}]; here, S[Y] is the substructure of S generated from Y by the functions of S. For κ, λ, μ cardinals, let Frμ(κ, λ) be the assertion:for every structure S with κ ⊂ S which has at most μ functions and relations there is a subset X ⊂ κ free in S of cardinality ≥ λ.We show that Frω(ωω, ω), the free-subset property for ωω, is equiconsistent with the existence of a measurable cardinal (2.2,4.4). This answers a question of Devlin [De].In the first section of this paper we prove some combinatorial facts about Frμ(κ, λ); in particular the first cardinal κ such that Frω(κ, ω) is weakly inaccessible or of cofinality ω (1.2). The second section shows that, under Frω(ωω, ω), ωω is measurable in an inner model. For the convenience of readers not acquainted with the core model κ, we first deduce the existence of 0# (2.1) using the inner model L. Then we adapt the proof to the core model and obtain that ωω is measurable in an inner model. For the reverse direction, we essentially apply a construction of Shelah [Sh] who forced Frω(ωω, ω) over a ground model which contains an ω-sequence of measurable cardinals. We show in §4 that indeed a coherent sequence of Ramsey cardinals suffices. In §3 we obtain such a sequence as an endsegment of a Prikry sequence.

The core model for sequences of measures. I

1984 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
High Order ◽  
Core Model ◽  
Basic Properties ◽  
The Core ◽  
Inner Model ◽  
Measurable Cardinals

The model K() presented in this paper is a new inner model of ZFC which can contain measurable cardinals of high order. Like the model L() of [14], from which it is derived, K() is constructed from a sequence of filters such that K() satisfies for each (α, β) ε domain () that (α,β) is a measure of order β on α and the only measures in K() are the measures (α,β). Furthermore K(), like L(), has many of the basic properties of L: the GCH and ⃟ hold and there is a definable well ordering which is on the reals. The model K() is derived from L() by using techniques of Dodd and Jensen [2–5] to build in absoluteness for measurability and related properties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document