Structural properties and Σ20 enumeration degrees

2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 285-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Nies ◽  
Andrea Sorbi
Keyword(s):  
Structural Properties ◽  
Enumeration Degrees ◽  
Enumeration Degree ◽  
Computably Enumerable

AbstractWe prove that each Σ20 set which is hypersimple relative to ∅′ is noncuppable in the structure of the Σ20 enumeration degrees. This gives a connection between properties of Σ20 sets under inclusion and and the Σ20 enumeration degrees. We also prove that some low non-computably enumerable enumeration degree contains no set which is simple relative to ∅′.

INITIAL SEGMENTS OF THE ENUMERATION DEGREES

2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 316-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
HRISTO GANCHEV ◽  
ANDREA SORBI
Keyword(s):  
Local Structure ◽  
Initial Segment ◽  
Nonzero Element ◽  
Enumeration Degrees ◽  
Enumeration Degree ◽  
Image Position

AbstractUsing properties of${\cal K}$-pairs of sets, we show that every nonzero enumeration degreeabounds a nontrivial initial segment of enumeration degrees whose nonzero elements have all the same jump asa. Some consequences of this fact are derived, that hold in the local structure of the enumeration degrees, including: There is an initial segment of enumeration degrees, whose nonzero elements are all high; there is a nonsplitting high enumeration degree; every noncappable enumeration degree is high; every nonzero low enumeration degree can be capped by degrees of any possible local jump (i.e., any jump that can be realized by enumeration degrees of the local structure); every enumeration degree that bounds a nonzero element of strictly smaller jump, is bounding; every low enumeration degree below a non low enumeration degreeacan be capped belowa.

Noncappable enumeration degrees below 0e′

1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 1347-1363 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Barry Cooper ◽  
Andrea Sorbi
Keyword(s):  
Enumeration Degrees ◽  
Enumeration Degree

AbstractWe prove that there exists a noncappable enumeration degree strictly below 0e′.

scholarly journals A NOTE ON INITIAL SEGMENTS OF THE ENUMERATION DEGREES

2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 633-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
THEODORE A. SLAMAN ◽  
ANDREA SORBI
Keyword(s):  
Partial Order ◽  
Principal Ideal ◽  
Total Degree ◽  
Enumeration Degrees ◽  
Enumeration Degree

AbstractWe show that no nontrivial principal ideal of the enumeration degrees is linearly ordered: in fact, below every nonzero enumeration degree one can embed every countable partial order. The result can be relativized above any total degree: if a,b are enumeration degrees, with a total, and a < b, then in the degree interval (a,b), one can embed every countable partial order.

TRIAL AND ERROR MATHEMATICS II: DIALECTICAL SETS AND QUASIDIALECTICAL SETS, THEIR DEGREES, AND THEIR DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE CLASS OF LIMIT SETS

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 810-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
JACOPO AMIDEI ◽  
DUCCIO PIANIGIANI ◽  
LUCA SAN MAURO ◽  
ANDREA SORBI
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Practice ◽  
Turing Degrees ◽  
Trial And Error ◽  
Close Inspection ◽  
Enumeration Degrees ◽  
Deductive Systems ◽  
Ershov Hierarchy ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Ordinal Notation ◽  
Computably Enumerable

AbstractThis paper is a continuation of Amidei, Pianigiani, San Mauro, Simi, & Sorbi (2016), where we have introduced the quasidialectical systems, which are abstract deductive systems designed to provide, in line with Lakatos’ views, a formalization of trial and error mathematics more adherent to the real mathematical practice of revision than Magari’s original dialectical systems. In this paper we prove that the two models of deductive systems (dialectical systems and quasidialectical systems) have in some sense the same information content, in that they represent two classes of sets (the dialectical sets and the quasidialectical sets, respectively), which have the same Turing degrees (namely, the computably enumerable Turing degrees), and the same enumeration degrees (namely, the ${\rm{\Pi }}_1^0$ enumeration degrees). Nonetheless, dialectical sets and quasidialectical sets do not coincide. Even restricting our attention to the so-called loopless quasidialectical sets, we show that the quasidialectical sets properly extend the dialectical sets. As both classes consist of ${\rm{\Delta }}_2^0$ sets, the extent to which the two classes differ is conveniently measured using the Ershov hierarchy: indeed, the dialectical sets are ω-computably enumerable (close inspection also shows that there are dialectical sets which do not lie in any finite level; and in every finite level n ≥ 2 of the Ershov hierarchy there is a dialectical set which does not lie in the previous level); on the other hand, the quasidialectical sets spread out throughout all classes of the hierarchy (close inspection shows that for every ordinal notation a of a nonzero computable ordinal, there is a quasidialectical set lying in ${\rm{\Sigma }}_a^{ - 1}$, but in none of the preceding levels).

On the jump classes of noncuppable enumeration degrees

2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles M. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Turing Degrees ◽  
Enumeration Degrees ◽  
Enumeration Degree

AbstractWe prove that for every Σ20 enumeration degree b there exists a noncuppable Σ20 degree a > 0e such that and . This allows us to deduce, from results on the high/low jump hierarchy in the local Turing degrees and the jump preserving properties of the standard embedding , that there exist Σ20 noncuppable enumeration degrees at every possible—i.e., above low1—level of the high/low jump hierarchy in the context of .

Bounding nonsplitting enumeration degrees

2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 1405-1417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Kent ◽  
Andrea Sorbi
Keyword(s):  
Enumeration Degrees ◽  
Enumeration Degree ◽  
Degree Bounds

AbstractWe show that every nonzero enumeration degree bounds a nonsplitting nonzero enumeration degree.

Jumps of quasi-minimal enumeration degrees

1985 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 839-848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin McEvoy
Keyword(s):  
Turing Degree ◽  
Partial Functions ◽  
Enumeration Degrees ◽  
Enumeration Degree ◽  
Enumeration Reducibility ◽  
Degree Structure ◽  
Usual Topology ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Second Category ◽  
Degrees Of Unsolvability

Enumeration reducibility is a reducibility between sets of natural numbers defined as follows: A is enumeration reducible to B if there is some effective operation on enumerations which when given any enumeration of B will produce an enumeration of A. One reason for interest in this reducibility is that it presents us with a natural reducibility between partial functions whose degree structure can be seen to extend the structure of the Turing degrees of unsolvability. In [7] Friedberg and Rogers gave a precise definition of enumeration reducibility, and in [12] Rogers presented a theorem of Medvedev [10] on the existence of what Case [1] was to call quasi-minimal degrees. Myhill [11] also defined this reducibility and proved that the class of quasi-minimal degrees is of second category in the usual topology. As Gutteridge [8] has shown that there are no minimal enumeration degrees (see Cooper [3]), the quasi-minimal degrees are very much of interest in the study of the structure of the enumeration degrees. In this paper we define a jump operator on the enumeration degrees which was introduced by Cooper [4], and show that every complete enumeration degree is the jump of a quasi-minimal degree. We also extend the notion of a high Turing degree to the enumeration degrees and construct a “high” quasi-minimal enumeration degree—a result which contrasts with Cooper's result in [2] that a high Turing degree cannot be minimal. Finally, we use the Sacks' Jump Theorem to characterise the jumps of the co-r.e. enumeration degrees.

Newborn's Preference for Faces

1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Umiltà ◽  
Francesca Simion ◽  
Eloisa Valenza
Keyword(s):  
Visual System ◽  
Structural Properties ◽  
Sensory Properties ◽  
Human Face ◽  
System Experiment ◽  
Face Experiment

Four experiments were aimed at elucidating some aspects of the preference for facelike patterns in newborns. Experiment 1 showed a preference for a stimulus whose components were located in the correct arrangement for a human face. Experiment 2 showed a preference for stimuli that had optimal sensory properties for the newborn visual system. Experiment 3 showed that babies directed their attention to a facelike pattern even when it was presented simultaneously with a non-facelike stimulus with optimal sensory properties. Experiment 4 showed the preference for facelike patterns in the temporal hemifield but not in the nasal hemifield. It was concluded that newborns' preference for facelike patterns reflects the activity of a subcortical system which is sensitive to the structural properties of the stimulus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document