Tests for the Analysis of Variance of Crossover Designs with Correlated Errors

Biometrics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 607 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Bellavance ◽  
S. Tardif ◽  
M. A. Stephens
Biometrics ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 695 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Cameron ◽  
G. K. Eagleson ◽  
M. E. Willcox ◽  
D. G. Laing ◽  
H. Panhuber

1981 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Holst Andersen ◽  
Eva Bjørn Jensen ◽  
Geert Schou ◽  
Eva Bjorn Jensen

1985 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 1391-1400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven P. Millard ◽  
John R. Yearsley ◽  
Dennis P. Lettenmaier

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) is commonly used to analyze observations collected from aquatic monitoring programs designed to detect ecological change. ANOVA assumes that the deviations of the observations from their true means (the errors) are uncorrelated in space and time. Aquatic monitoring data often violate this assumption. The results of Monte Carlo simulations using simulated data generated from both statistically and mechanistically based models show that the presence of either spatially or temporally correlated errors can significantly affect the outcome of ANOVA tests. In practice, spatial correlation is more likely to be a problem than is temporal correlation, given typical monitoring frequencies. The effects of spatial correlation can be minimized through judicious use of control station pairing in the monitoring design. However, when insufficient flexibility exists in the monitoring design, alternate models, such as multivariate time series analysis, or multivariate analysis of variance, must be used in place of ANOVA.


Author(s):  
C. Patrick Doncaster ◽  
Andrew J. H. Davey
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document