An Unusual Pattern of Gene Flow between the Two Social Forms of the Fire Ant Solenopsis invicta

Evolution ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth G. Ross ◽  
D. DeWayne Shoemaker
Genetics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 147 (2) ◽  
pp. 643-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth G Ross ◽  
Michael J B Krieger ◽  
D DeWayne Shoemaker ◽  
Edward L Vargo ◽  
Laurent Keller

We describe genetic structure at various scales in native populations of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta using two classes of nuclear markers, allozymes and microsatellites, and markers of the mitochondrial genome. Strong structure was found at the nest level in both the monogyne (single queen) and polygyne (multiple queen) social forms using allozymes. Weak but significant microgeographic structure was detected above the nest level in polygyne populations but not in monogyne populations using both classes of nuclear markers. Pronounced mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) differentiation was evident also at this level in the polygyne form only. These microgeographic patterns are expected because polygyny in ants is associated with restricted local gene flow due mainly to limited vagility of queens. Weak but significant nuclear differentiation was detected between sympatric social forms, and strong mtDNA differentiation also was found at this level. Thus, queens of each form seem unable to establish themselves in nests of the alternate type, and some degree of assortative mating by form may exist as well. Strong differentiation was found between the two study regions usinga all three sets of markers. Phylogeographic analyses of the mtDNA suggest that recent limitations on gene flow rather than longstanding barriers to dispersal are responsible for this large-scale structure.


Author(s):  
MacKenzie Kjeldgaard ◽  
Pierre-André Eyer ◽  
Collin McMichael ◽  
Alison Bockoven ◽  
Joanie King ◽  
...  

Evaluating the factors that promote invasive ant abundance is critical to assess their ecological impact and inform their management. Many invasive ant species show reduced nestmate recognition and an absence of boundaries between unrelated nests, which allow populations to achieve greater densities due to reduced intraspecific competition. We examined nestmate discrimination and colony boundaries in introduced populations of the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta; hereafter, fire ant). Fire ants occur in two social forms: monogyne (colonies with a single egg-laying queen) and polygyne (colonies with multiple egg-laying queens). In contrast with monogyne nests, polygyne nests are thought to be interconnected due to the reduced antagonism between non-nestmate polygyne workers, perhaps because polygyne workers habituate the colony to an odor unique to Gp-9-carrying adults. However, colony boundaries and nestmate discrimination are poorly documented, particularly for worker-brood interactions. To delimit boundaries between field colonies, we correlated the exchange of a N-glycine tracer dissolved in a sucrose solution with social form. We also evaluated nestmate discrimination between polygyne workers and larvae in the laboratory. Counter to our expectations, polygyne colonies behaved identically to monogyne colonies, suggesting both social forms maintain strict colony boundaries. Polygyne workers also preferentially fed larval nestmates and may have selectively cannibalized non-nestmates. The levels of relatedness among workers in polygyne colonies was higher than those previously reported in North America (mean ±SE: 0.269 ± 0.037). Our study highlights the importance of combining genetic analyses with direct quantification of resource exchange to better understand the factors influencing ant invasions.


2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dee Colby ◽  
Lacy Inmon ◽  
Lane Foil

Classification of red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren, colonies as monogyne or polygyne by using differences in worker size (head widths) was compared to PCR discrimination of alleles for colony social form. Maximum head widths were significantly different between the two social forms, but reliable assignment of social form based on head widths was not possible because of considerable overlap in sizes among ants in the two social forms.


Author(s):  
Mark C. Mescher ◽  
Kenneth G. Ross ◽  
D. Dewayne Shoemaker ◽  
Laurent Keller ◽  
Michael J. B. Krieger

Evolution ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1595-1605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth G. Ross ◽  
D. DeWayne Shoemaker

Nature ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 383 (6601) ◽  
pp. 613-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. DeWayne Shoemaker ◽  
Kenneth G. Ross

Evolution ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. D. Goodisman ◽  
Kenneth G. Ross ◽  
Marjorie A. Asmussen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document