The Equivalence of Two Maximality Principles

1962 ◽  
Vol 69 (9) ◽  
pp. 911
Author(s):  
Alexander R. Bednarek
Keyword(s):  
Maximality Principles

scholarly journals Closed maximality principles: implications, separations and combinations

2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 276-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunter Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
Equivalence Relation ◽  
Regular Cardinal ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
Souslin Trees ◽  
Maximality Principles ◽  
Automorphism Tower

AbstractI investigate versions of the Maximality Principles for the classes of forcings which are <κ-closed, <κ-directed-closed, or of the form Col(κ, <λ). These principles come in many variants, depending on the parameters which are allowed, I shall write MPΓ (A) for the maximality principle for forcings in Γ, with parameters from A. The main results of this paper are:• The principles have many consequences, such as <κ-closed-generic (Hκ) absoluteness, and imply, e.g., that ◊κ holds. I give an application to the automorphism tower problem, showing that there are Souslin trees which are able to realize any equivalence relation, and hence that there are groups whose automorphism tower is highly sensitive to forcing.• The principles can be separated into a hierarchy which is strict, for many κ.• Some of the principles can be combined, in the sense that they can hold at many different κ simultaneously.The possibilities of combining the principles are limited, though: While it is consistent that MP<κ-closed(Hκ +) holds at all regular κ below any fixed α, the “global” maximality principle, stating that MP<κ-closed (Hκ ∪ {κ} ) holds at every regular κ, is inconsistent. In contrast to this, it is equiconsistent with ZFC that the maximality principle for directed-closed forcings without any parameters holds at every regular cardinal. It is also consistent that every local statement with parameters from Hκ⊦ that's provably <κ-closed-forceably necessary is true, for all regular κ.

scholarly journals Combined Maximality Principles up to large cardinals

2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 1015-1046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunter Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
Regular Cardinal ◽  
Large Cardinals ◽  
Large Cardinal ◽  
Consistency Strength ◽  
Regular Cardinals ◽  
Maximality Principles

AbstractThe motivation for this paper is the following: In [4] I showed that it is inconsistent with ZFC that the Maximality Principle for directed closed forcings holds at unboundedly many regular cardinals κ (even only allowing κ itself as a parameter in the Maximality Principle for <κ-closed forcings each time). So the question is whether it is consistent to have this principle at unboundedly many regular cardinals or at every regular cardinal below some large cardinal κ (instead of ∞), and if so, how strong it is. It turns out that it is consistent in many cases, but the consistency strength is quite high.

scholarly journals On a class of maximality principles

2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 713-725
Author(s):  
Daisuke Ikegami ◽  
Nam Trang
Keyword(s):  
Maximality Principles
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document