Complete representations in algebraic logic

1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 816-847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Hirsch ◽  
Ian Hodkinson
Keyword(s):  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Algebraic Logic ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
Fixed Dimension ◽  
Complete Representations ◽  
Representable Relation

AbstractA boolean algebra is shown to be completely representable if and only if it is atomic, whereas it is shown that neither the class of completely representable relation algebras nor the class of completely representable cylindric algebras of any fixed dimension (at least 3) are elementary.

Step by step – Building representations in algebraic logic

1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Hirsch ◽  
Ian Hodkinson
Keyword(s):  
Algebraic Logic ◽  
Relation Algebra ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
Step Method ◽  
Finite Case ◽  
Representable Relation Algebra ◽  
Important Open Problem ◽  
Player Game ◽  
Representable Relation

AbstractWe consider the problem of finding and classifying representations in algebraic logic. This is approached by letting two players build a representation using a game. Homogeneous and universal representations are characterized according to the outcome of certain games. The Lyndon conditions defining representable relation algebras (for the finite case) and a similar schema for cylindric algebras are derived. Finte relation algebras with homogeneous representations are characterized by first order formulas. Equivalence games are defined, and are used to establish whether an algebra is ω-categorical. We have a simple proof that the perfect extension of a representable relation algebra is completely representable.An important open problem from algebraic logic is addressed by devising another two-player game, and using it to derive equational axiomatisations for the classes of all representable relation algebras and representable cylindric algebras.Other instances of this approach are looked at, and include the step by step method.

scholarly journals On complete representations and minimal completions in algebraic logic, both positive and negative results

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Sayed Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Algebraic Logic ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
Polyadic Algebras ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Complete Representations

Fix a finite ordinal \(n\geq 3\) and let \(\alpha\) be an arbitrary ordinal. Let \(\mathsf{CA}_n\) denote the class of cylindric algebras of dimension \(n\) and \(\sf RA\) denote the class of relation algebras. Let \(\mathbf{PA}_{\alpha}(\mathsf{PEA}_{\alpha})\) stand for the class of polyadic (equality) algebras of dimension \(\alpha\). We reprove that the class \(\mathsf{CRCA}_n\) of completely representable \(\mathsf{CA}_n$s, and the class \(\sf CRRA\) of completely representable \(\mathsf{RA}\)s are not elementary, a result of Hirsch and Hodkinson. We extend this result to any variety \(\sf V\) between polyadic algebras of dimension \(n\) and diagonal free \(\mathsf{CA}_n\)s. We show that that the class of completely and strongly representable algebras in \(\sf V\) is not elementary either, reproving a result of Bulian and Hodkinson. For relation algebras, we can and will, go further. We show the class \(\sf CRRA\) is not closed under \(\equiv_{\infty,\omega}\). In contrast, we show that given \(\alpha\geq \omega\), and an atomic \(\mathfrak{A}\in \mathsf{PEA}_{\alpha}\), then for any \(n<\omega\), \(\mathfrak{Nr}_n\A\) is a completely representable \(\mathsf{PEA}_n\). We show that for any \(\alpha\geq \omega\), the class of completely representable algebras in certain reducts of \(\mathsf{PA}_{\alpha}\)s, that happen to be varieties, is elementary. We show that for \(\alpha\geq \omega\), the the class of polyadic-cylindric algebras dimension \(\alpha\), introduced by Ferenczi, the completely representable algebras (slightly altering representing algebras) coincide with the atomic ones. In the last algebras cylindrifications commute only one way, in a sense weaker than full fledged commutativity of cylindrifications enjoyed by classical cylindric and polyadic algebras. Finally, we address closure under Dedekind-MacNeille completions for cylindric-like algebras of dimension \(n\) and \(\mathsf{PA}_{\alpha}\)s for \(\alpha\) an infinite ordinal, proving negative results for the first and positive ones for the second.

Non-finite-axiomatizability results in algebraic logic

1992 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 832-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Balázs Biró
Keyword(s):  
Algebraic Logic ◽  
Relation Algebra ◽  
Equational Theory ◽  
Negative Answer ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Representable Relation Algebra ◽  
Finite Set ◽  
Variable Symbol ◽  
Axiom Systems ◽  
Representable Relation

This paper deals with relation, cylindric and polyadic equality algebras. First of all it addresses a problem of B. Jónsson. He asked whether relation set algebras can be expanded by finitely many new operations in a “reasonable” way so that the class of these expansions would possess a finite equational base. The present paper gives a negative answer to this problem: Our main theorem states that whenever Rs+ is a class that consists of expansions of relation set algebras such that each operation of Rs+ is logical in Jónsson's sense, i.e., is the algebraic counterpart of some (derived) connective of first-order logic, then the equational theory of Rs+ has no finite axiom systems. Similar results are stated for the other classes mentioned above. As a corollary to this theorem we can solve a problem of Tarski and Givant [87], Namely, we claim that the valid formulas of certain languages cannot be axiomatized by a finite set of logical axiom schemes. At the same time we give a negative solution for a version of a problem of Henkin and Monk [74] (cf. also Monk [70] and Németi [89]).Throughout we use the terminology, notation and results of Henkin, Monk, Tarski [71] and [85]. We also use results of Maddux [89a].Notation. RA denotes the class of relation algebras, Rs denotes the class of relation set algebras and RRA is the class of representable relation algebras, i.e. the class of subdirect products of relation set algebras. The symbols RA, Rs and RRA abbreviate also the expressions relation algebra, relation set algebra and representable relation algebra, respectively.For any class C of similar algebras EqC is the set of identities that hold in C, while Eq1C is the set of those identities in EqC that contain at most one variable symbol. (We note that Henkin et al. [85] uses the symbol EqC in another sense.)

scholarly journals Undecidable theories of Lyndon algebras

2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Stebletsova ◽  
Yde Venema
Keyword(s):  
Projective Geometry ◽  
Algebraic Logic ◽  
Equational Theory ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
Projective Geometries ◽  
Interesting Connection

AbstractWith each projective geometry we can associate a Lyndon algebra. Such an algebra always satisfies Tarski's axioms for relation algebras and Lyndon algebras thus form an interesting connection between the fields of projective geometry and algebraic logic. In this paper we prove that if G is a class of projective geometries which contains an infinite projective geometry of dimension at least three, then the class L(G) of Lyndon algebras associated with projective geometries in G has an undecidable equational theory. In our proof we develop and use a connection between projective geometries and diagonal-free cylindric algebras.

Relation algebra reducts of cylindric algebras and an application to proof theory

2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 197-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Hirsch ◽  
Ian Hodkinson ◽  
Roger D. Maddux
Keyword(s):  
Proof Theory ◽  
Predicate Logic ◽  
Algebraic Logic ◽  
Relation Algebra ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
First Order ◽  
Order Language ◽  
Binary Relation Symbol ◽  
Made In

AbstractWe confirm a conjecture, about neat embeddings of cylindric algebras, made in 1969 by J. D. Monk, and a later conjecture by Maddux about relation algebras obtained from cylindric algebras. These results in algebraic logic have the following consequence for predicate logic: for every finite cardinal α ≥ 3 there is a logically valid sentence X, in a first-order language ℒ with equality and exactly one nonlogical binary relation symbol E, such that X contains only 3 variables (each of which may occur arbitrarily many times), X has a proof containing exactly α + 1 variables, but X has no proof containing only α variables. This solves a problem posed by Tarski and Givant in 1987.

Omitting types for finite variable fragments and complete representations of algebras

2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajnal Andréka ◽  
István Németi ◽  
Tarek Sayed Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Algebraic Logic ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
First Order ◽  
Complete Representations ◽  
Atomic Relation ◽  
Representations Of Algebras ◽  
Omitting Types ◽  
Binary Relation Symbol

AbstractWe give a novel application of algebraic logic to first order logic. A new, flexible construction is presented for representable but not completely representable atomic relation and cylindric algebras of dimension n (for finite n > 2) with the additional property that they are one-generated and the set of all n by n atomic matrices forms a cylindric basis. We use this construction to show that the classical Henkin-Orey omitting types theorem fails for the finite variable fragments of first order logic as long as the number of variables available is > 2 and we have a binary relation symbol in our language. We also prove a stronger result to the effect that there is no finite upper bound for the extra variables needed in the witness formulas. This result further emphasizes the ongoing interplay between algebraic logic and first order logic.

Algebraic Logic, Where Does it Stand Today?

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Sayed Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Proof Theory ◽  
Algebraic Logic ◽  
Theory Model ◽  
Historical Background ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
Open Problems ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Omitting Types ◽  
Modern Perspective

AbstractThis is a survey article on algebraic logic. It gives a historical background leading up to a modern perspective. Central problems in algebraic logic (like the representation problem) are discussed in connection to other branches of logic, like modal logic, proof theory, model-theoretic forcing, finite combinatorics, and Gödel's incompleteness results. We focus on cylindric algebras. Relation algebras and polyadic algebras are mostly covered only insofar as they relate to cylindric algebras, and even there we have not told the whole story. We relate the algebraic notion of neat embeddings (a notion special to cylindric algebras) to the metalogical ones of provability, interpolation and omitting types in variants of first logic. Another novelty that occurs here is relating the algebraic notion of atom-canonicity for a class of boolean algebras with operators to the metalogical one of omitting types for the corresponding logic. A hitherto unpublished application of algebraic logic to omitting types of first order logic is given. Proofs are included when they serve to illustrate certain concepts. Several open problems are posed. We have tried as much as possible to avoid exploring territory already explored in the survey articles of Monk [93] and Németi [97] in the subject.

Relation algebra reducts of cylindric algebras and complete representations

2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 673-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Hirsch
Keyword(s):  
Elementary Theory ◽  
Winning Strategy ◽  
Relation Algebra ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
Complete Representation ◽  
Recursively Enumerable ◽  
Complete Representations ◽  
Atomic Relation ◽  
Image Position

AbstractWe show, for any ordinal γ ≥ 3, that the class ℜaCAγ is pseudo-elementary and has a recursively enumerable elementary theory. ScK denotes the class of strong subalgebras of members of the class K. We devise games, Fn (3 ≤ n ≤ ω), G, H, and show, for an atomic relation algebra with countably many atoms, thatfor 3 ≤ n < ω. We use these games to show, for γ > 5 and any class K of relation algebras satisfyingthat K is not closed under subalgebras and is not elementary. For infinite γ, the inclusion ℜaCAγ ⊂ ScℜaCAγ is strict.For infinite γ and for a countable relation algebra we show that has a complete representation if and only if is atomic and ∃ has a winning strategy in F (At()) if and only if is atomic and ∈ ScℜaCAγ.

Perfect extensions and derived algebras

1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 775-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajnal Andréka ◽  
Steven Givant ◽  
István Németi
Keyword(s):  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Direct Product ◽  
Homomorphic Image ◽  
Algebraic Logic ◽  
Negative Answer ◽  
Direct Products ◽  
Cylindric Algebra ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Multiplicative Operator ◽  
Derived Algebras

Jónsson and Tarski [1951] introduced the notion of a Boolean algebra with (additive) operators (for short, a Bo). They showed that every Bo can be extended to a complete and atomic Bo satisfying certain additional conditions, and that any two complete, atomic extensions of satisfying these conditions are isomorphic over . Henkin [1970] extended these results to Boolean algebras with generalized (i.e., weakly additive) operators. The particular complete, atomic extension of studied by Jónsson and Tarski is called the perfect extension of , and is denoted by +. It is very useful in algebraic investigations of classes of algebras that are associated with logics.Interesting examples of Bos abound in algebraic logic, and include relation algebras, cylindric algebras, and polyadic and quasi-polyadic algebras (with or without equality). Moreover, there are several important constructions that, when applied to certain Bos, lead to other, derived Bos. Obvious examples include the formation of subalgebras, homomorphic images, relativizations, and direct products. Other examples include the Boolean algebra of ideal elements of a Bo, the neat β;-reduct of an α-dimensional cylindric algebra (β; < α), and the relation algebraic reduct of a cylindric algebra (of dimension at least 3). It is natural to ask about the relationship between the perfect extension of a Bo and the perfect extension of one of its derived algebras ′: Is the perfect extension of the derived algebra just the derived algebra of the perfect extension? In symbols, is (′)+ = (+)′? For example, is the perfect extension of a subalgebra, homomorphic image, relativization, or direct product, just the corresponding subalgebra, homomorphic image, relativization, or direct product of the perfect extension (up to isomorphisms)? Is the perfect extension of the Boolean algebra of ideal elements, or the neat reduct of a cylindric algebra, or the relation algebraic reduct of a cylindric algebra just the Boolean algebra of ideal elements, or the neat β;-reduct, or the relation algebraic reduct, of the perfect extension? We shall prove a general result in this direction; namely, if the derived algebra is constructed as the range of a relatively multiplicative operator, then the answer to our question is “yes”. We shall also give examples to show that in “infinitary” constructions, our question can have a spectacularly negative answer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document