Semilinear cell decomposition

1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nianzheng Liu

AbstractWe obtain a p-adic semilinear cell decomposition theorem using methods developed by Denef in [Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, vol. 369 (1986), pp. 154–166]. We also prove that any set definable with quantifiers in (0,1, +, —, λq, Pn){n∈ℕ,q∈ℚp} may be defined without quantifiers, where λq is scalar multiplication by q and Pn is a unary predicate which denotes the nonzero nth powers in the p-adic field ℚp. Such a set is called a p-adic semilinear set in this paper. Some further considerations are discussed in the last section.

2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
LUCK DARNIÈRE ◽  
IMMANUEL HALPUCZOK

AbstractWe prove that forp-optimal fields (a very large subclass ofp-minimal fields containing all the known examples) a cell decomposition theorem follows from methods going back to Denef’s paper [7]. We derive from it the existence of definable Skolem functions and strongp-minimality. Then we turn to stronglyp-minimal fields satisfying the Extreme Value Property—a property which in particular holds in fields which are elementarily equivalent to ap-adic one. For such fieldsK, we prove that every definable subset ofK×Kdwhose fibers overKare inverse images by the valuation of subsets of the value group is semialgebraic. Combining the two we get a preparation theorem for definable functions onp-optimal fields satisfying the Extreme Value Property, from which it follows that infinite sets definable over such fields are in definable bijection iff they have the same dimension.


2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raf Cluckers

AbstractWe prove a cell decomposition theorem for Presburger sets and introduce a dimension theory for Z-groups with the Presburger structure. Using the cell decomposition theorem we obtain a full classification of Presburger sets up to definable bijection. We also exhibit a tight connection between the definable sets in an arbitrary p-minimal field and Presburger sets in its value group. We give a negative result about expansions of Presburger structures and prove uniform elimination of imaginaries for Presburger structures within the Presburger language.


1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 285-303
Author(s):  
Nianzheng Liu

The p-adic semianalytic sets are defined, locally, as boolean combinations of sets of the form over the p-adic fields ℚp, where f is an analytic function. A well-know example due to Osgood showed the projection of a semianalytic set need not be a semianalytic set. We call those sets that are, locally, the projections of p-adic semianalytic sets p-adic subanalytic sets. The theory of p-adic subanalytic sets was presented by Denef and Van den Dries in [5]. The basic tools are the quantifier elimination techniques together with the ultrametric Weierstrass Preparation Theorem. Simultaneously with their developments of the p-adic subanalytic sets, they established some basic properties of p-adic semianalytic sets.In this paper, we prove that the closure of any p-adic semianalytic set is also a semianalytic set. The analogous property for real semianalytic sets was proved in [12] and that for rigid semianalytic sets, informed by the referee, has been proved recently by a quite different method in [14] (cf. [9]). The keys to the proof are a separation lemma (Lemma 2) and an analytic cell decomposition theorem (Theorem 2) which is an analytic version of Denef's cell decomposition theorem (see [3, 4]; A total different form of anayltic cells appeared in [13]). The analytic cell decomposition theorem allows us to partition certain kinds of basic subsets into analytic cells that possess the closure property (see §1 for the definition).


2009 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 167-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALESSANDRO BERARDUCCI ◽  
ANTONGIULIO FORNASIERO

The topology of definable sets in an o-minimal expansion of a group is not fully understood due to the lack of a triangulation theorem. Despite the general validity of the cell decomposition theorem, we do not know whether any definably compact set is a definable CW-complex. Moreover the closure of an o-minimal cell can have arbitrarily high Betti numbers. Nevertheless we prove that the cohomology groups of a definably compact set over an o-minimal expansion of a group are finitely generated and invariant under elementary extensions and expansions of the language.


2007 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 195-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
RAF CLUCKERS ◽  
FRANÇOIS LOESER

We introduce a new notion of tame geometry for structures admitting an abstract notion of balls. The notion is named b-minimality and is based on definable families of points and balls. We develop a dimension theory and prove a cell decomposition theorem for b-minimal structures. We show that b-minimality applies to the theory of Henselian valued fields of characteristic zero, generalizing work by Denef–Pas [25, 26]. Structures which are o-minimal, v-minimal, or p-minimal and which satisfy some slight extra conditions are also b-minimal, but b-minimality leaves more room for nontrivial expansions. The b-minimal setting is intended to be a natural framework for the construction of Euler characteristics and motivic or p-adic integrals. The b-minimal cell decomposition is a generalization of concepts of Cohen [11], Denef [15], and the link between cell decomposition and integration was first made by Denef [13].


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Di Nola ◽  
Revaz Grigolia ◽  
Nunu Mitskevich ◽  
Gaetano Vitale

AbstractIt is introduced an immune dynamic n-valued Łukasiewicz logic $$ID{\L }_n$$ I D Ł n on the base of n-valued Łukasiewicz logic $${\L }_n$$ Ł n and corresponding to it immune dynamic $$MV_n$$ M V n -algebra ($$IDL_n$$ I D L n -algebra), $$1< n < \omega $$ 1 < n < ω , which are algebraic counterparts of the logic, that in turn represent two-sorted algebras $$(\mathcal {M}, \mathcal {R}, \Diamond )$$ ( M , R , ◊ ) that combine the varieties of $$MV_n$$ M V n -algebras $$\mathcal {M} = (M, \oplus , \odot , \sim , 0,1)$$ M = ( M , ⊕ , ⊙ , ∼ , 0 , 1 ) and regular algebras $$\mathcal {R} = (R,\cup , ;, ^*)$$ R = ( R , ∪ , ; , ∗ ) into a single finitely axiomatized variety resembling R-module with “scalar” multiplication $$\Diamond $$ ◊ . Kripke semantics is developed for immune dynamic Łukasiewicz logic $$ID{\L }_n$$ I D Ł n with application in immune system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document