Remarks on the Church-Rosser Property

1990 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-112
Author(s):  
E. G. K. López-Escobar
Keyword(s):  
Lambda Calculus ◽  
Direct Proof ◽  
Propositional Calculus ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Strong Normalization ◽  
Normalization Theorem ◽  
Intuitionistic Propositional Calculus ◽  
The Church

AbstractA reduction algebra is defined as a set with a collection of partial unary functions (called reduction operators). Motivated by the lambda calculus, the Church-Rosser property is defined for a reduction algebra and a characterization is given for those reduction algebras satisfying CRP and having a measure respecting the reductions. The characterization is used to give (with 20/20 hindsight) a more direct proof of the strong normalization theorem for the impredicative second order intuitionistic propositional calculus.

scholarly journals On an interpretation of second order quantification in first order intuitionistic propositional logic

1992 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Pitts
Keyword(s):  
Propositional Logic ◽  
Heyting Algebra ◽  
Propositional Calculus ◽  
Interpolation Theorem ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Heyting Algebras ◽  
Intuitionistic Propositional Logic ◽  
First Order ◽  
Intuitionistic Propositional Calculus ◽  
Algebraic Counterpart

AbstractWe prove the following surprising property of Heyting's intuitionistic propositional calculus, IpC. Consider the collection of formulas, ϕ, built up from propositional variables (p, q, r, …) and falsity (⊥) using conjunction (∧), disjunction (∨) and implication (→). Write ⊢ϕ to indicate that such a formula is intuitionistically valid. We show that for each variable p and formula ϕ there exists a formula Apϕ (effectively computable from ϕ), containing only variables not equal to p which occur in ϕ, and such that for all formulas ψ not involving p, ⊢ψ → Apϕ if and only if ⊢ψ → ϕ. Consequently quantification over propositional variables can be modelled in IpC, and there is an interpretation of the second order propositional calculus, IpC2, in IpC which restricts to the identity on first order propositions.An immediate corollary is the strengthening of the usual interpolation theorem for IpC to the statement that there are least and greatest interpolant formulas for any given pair of formulas. The result also has a number of interesting consequences for the algebraic counterpart of IpC, the theory of Heyting algebras. In particular we show that a model of IpC2 can be constructed whose algebra of truth-values is equal to any given Heyting algebra.

scholarly journals Atomic polymorphism

2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 260-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Ferreira ◽  
Gilda Ferreira
Keyword(s):  
Crucial Role ◽  
Propositional Calculus ◽  
Reduction Step ◽  
Strong Normalization ◽  
Intuitionistic Propositional Calculus ◽  
Polymorphic System ◽  
System F

AbstractIt has been known for six years that the restriction of Girard's polymorphic system F to atomic universal instantiations interprets the full fragment of the intuitionistic propositional calculus. We firstly observe that Tait's method of “convertibility” applies quite naturally to the proof of strong normalization of the restricted Girard system. We then show that each β-reduction step of the full intuitionistic propositional calculus translates into one or more βη-reduction steps in the restricted Girard system. As a consequence, we obtain a novel and perspicuous proof of the strong normalization property for the full intuitionistic propositional calculus. It is noticed that this novel proof bestows a crucial role to η-conversions.

A general method for proving the normalization theorem for first and second order typed λ-calculi

1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 719-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
VENANZIO CAPRETTA ◽  
SILVIO VALENTINI
Keyword(s):  
Type System ◽  
Lambda Calculus ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Typed Lambda Calculus ◽  
Normalization Theorem ◽  
System F ◽  
Dependent Type ◽  
General Method

In this paper we describe a method for proving the normalization property for a large variety of typed lambda calculi of first and second order, which is based on a proof of equivalence of two deduction systems. We first illustrate the method on the elementary example of simply typed lambda calculus, and then we show how to extend it to a more expressive dependent type system. Finally we use it to prove the normalization theorem for Girard's system F.

scholarly journals The Limits of Computation

Axiomathes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Powell
Keyword(s):  
Natural Number ◽  
Set Theory ◽  
Lambda Calculus ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Functional Interpretation ◽  
Arbitrary Type ◽  
Computable Functions

AbstractThis article provides a survey of key papers that characterise computable functions, but also provides some novel insights as follows. It is argued that the power of algorithms is at least as strong as functions that can be proved to be totally computable in type-theoretic translations of subsystems of second-order Zermelo Fraenkel set theory. Moreover, it is claimed that typed systems of the lambda calculus give rise naturally to a functional interpretation of rich systems of types and to a hierarchy of ordinal recursive functionals of arbitrary type that can be reduced by substitution to natural number functions.

Formalization of metatheory of the Lambda Calculus in constructive type theory using the Barendregt variable convention

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Ernesto Copello ◽  
Nora Szasz ◽  
Álvaro Tasistro
Keyword(s):  
Type Theory ◽  
Lambda Calculus ◽  
Proof Assistant ◽  
First Order ◽  
Constructive Type Theory ◽  
Fundamental Part ◽  
Constructive Type ◽  
Free Variables ◽  
The Church ◽  
Theoretical Results

Abstarct We formalize in Constructive Type Theory the Lambda Calculus in its classical first-order syntax, employing only one sort of names for both bound and free variables, and with α-conversion based upon name swapping. As a fundamental part of the formalization, we introduce principles of induction and recursion on terms which provide a framework for reproducing the use of the Barendregt Variable Convention as in pen-and-paper proofs within the rigorous formal setting of a proof assistant. The principles in question are all formally derivable from the simple principle of structural induction/recursion on concrete terms. We work out applications to some fundamental meta-theoretical results, such as the Church–Rosser Theorem and Weak Normalization for the Simply Typed Lambda Calculus. The whole development has been machine checked using the system Agda.

Normalization theorems for full first order classical natural deduction

1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnar Stålmarck
Keyword(s):  
Normal Form ◽  
Natural Deduction ◽  
Full System ◽  
Strong Normalization ◽  
Logical Constants ◽  
Restricted Version ◽  
First Order ◽  
Form Theorem ◽  
Normalization Theorem ◽  
Normal Form Theorem

In this paper we prove the strong normalization theorem for full first order classical N.D. (natural deduction)—full in the sense that all logical constants are taken as primitive. We also give a syntactic proof of the normal form theorem and (weak) normalization for the same system.The theorem has been stated several times, and some proofs appear in the literature. The first proof occurs in Statman [1], where full first order classical N.D. (with the elimination rules for ∨ and ∃ restricted to atomic conclusions) is embedded in a system for second order (propositional) intuitionistic N.D., for which a strong normalization theorem is proved using strongly impredicative methods.A proof of the normal form theorem and (weak) normalization theorem occurs in Seldin [1] as an extension of a proof of the same theorem for an N.D.-system for the intermediate logic called MH.The proof of the strong normalization theorem presented in this paper is obtained by proving that a certain kind of validity applies to all derivations in the system considered.The notion “validity” is adopted from Prawitz [2], where it is used to prove the strong normalization theorem for a restricted version of first order classical N.D., and is extended to cover the full system. Notions similar to “validity” have been used earlier by Tait (convertability), Girard (réducibilité) and Martin-Löf (computability).In Prawitz [2] the N.D. system is restricted in the sense that ∨ and ∃ are not treated as primitive logical constants, and hence the deductions can only be seen to be “natural” with respect to the other logical constants. To spell it out, the strong normalization theorem for the restricted version of first order classical N.D. together with the well-known results on the definability of the rules for ∨ and ∃ in the restricted system does not imply the normalization theorem for the full system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document