Recursive Boolean algebras with recursive atoms

1981 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 595-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey B. Remmel
Keyword(s):  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Boolean Algebras ◽  
Isomorphism Type ◽  
Natural Numbers ◽  
Recursive Isomorphism ◽  
The Ideal

A Boolean algebra (henceforth abbreviated B.A.) is said to be recursive if B is a recursive subset of the natural numbers N and the operations ∧ (meet), ∨ (join), and ¬ (complement) are partial recursive. Let denote the set of atoms of and denote the ideal generated by the atoms of . Given recursive B.A.s and , we write ≈ if is isomorphic to and ≈r if is recursively isomorphic to , i.e., if there is a partial recursive isomorphism from onto .Recursive B.A.s have been studied by several authors including Ershov [2], Fiener [3], [4], Goncharov [5], [6], [7], LaRoche [8], Nurtazin [7], and the author [10], [11]. This paper continues a study of the recursion theoretic relationships among , , and the recursive isomorphism type of a recursive B.A. we started in [11]. We refer the reader to [11] for any unexplained notation and definitions. In [11], we were mainly concerned with the possible recursion theoretic properties of the set of atoms in recursive B.A.s. We found that even if we insist that be recursive, there is considerable freedom for the properties of . For example, we showed that if is a recursive B.A. such that is recursive and is infinite, then (i) there exists a recursive B.A. such that and both and are recursive and (ii) for any nonzero r.e. degree δ, there exist recursive B.A.s , , … such that for each i, is of degree δ, is recursive, is immune if i is even and is not immune if i is odd, and no two B.A.s in the sequence are recursively isomorphic.

Recursive isomorphism types of recursive Boolean algebras

1981 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 572-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Remmel
Keyword(s):  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Recursive Function ◽  
Boolean Algebras ◽  
Isomorphism Type ◽  
Turing Degrees ◽  
Main Question ◽  
Partial Recursive Function ◽  
Recursive Isomorphism ◽  
Infinite Set ◽  
The Ideal

A Boolean algebra is recursive if B is a recursive subset of the natural numbers N and the operations ∧ (meet), ∨ (join), and ¬ (complement) are partial recursive. Given two Boolean algebras and , we write if is isomorphic to and if is recursively isomorphic to , that is, if there is a partial recursive function f: B1 → B2 which is an isomorphism from to . will denote the set of atoms of and () will denote the ideal generated by the atoms of .One of the main questions which motivated this paper is “To what extent does the classical isomorphism type of a recursive Boolean algebra restrict the possible recursion theoretic properties of ?” For example, it is easy to see that must be co-r.e. (i.e., N − is an r.e. set), but can be immune, not immune, cohesive, etc? It follows from a result of Goncharov [4] that there exist classical isomorphism types which contain recursive Boolean algebras but do not contain any recursive Boolean algebras such that is recursive. Thus the classical isomorphism can restrict the possible Turing degrees of , but what is the extent of this restriction? Another main question is “What is the recursion theoretic relationship between and () in a recursive Boolean algebra?” In our attempt to answer these questions, we were led to a wide variety of recursive isomorphism types which are contained in the classical isomorphism type of any recursive Boolean algebra with an infinite set of atoms.

Repercussions of a Problem of Erdős and Ulam on Density Ideals

1990 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 902-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winfried Just
Keyword(s):  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Natural Number ◽  
Natural Numbers ◽  
Logarithmic Density ◽  
Density Zero ◽  
Image Position ◽  
The Ideal

By P(ω) we denote the Boolean algebra of all subsets of the set ω of natural numbers. We identify each natural number with the set of its predecessors and define: the ideal of sets of density zero, and the ideal of sets of logarithmic density zero.

Maximal irredundance and maximal ideal independence in Boolean algebras

2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 261-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Donald Monk
Keyword(s):  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Maximal Ideal ◽  
Boolean Algebras ◽  
Independent Subset ◽  
Cardinal Invariant ◽  
Associated Functions ◽  
Atomless Boolean Algebra ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
The Ideal

Recall that a subset X of an algebra A is irredundant iff x ∉ 〈X∖{x}〉 for all x ϵ X, where 〈X∖{x}) is the subalgebra generated by X∖{x}. By Zorn's lemma there is always a maximal irredundant set in an algebra. This gives rise to a natural cardinal function Irrmm(A) = min{∣X∣: X is a maximal irredundant subset of A}. The first half of this article is devoted to proving that there is an atomless Boolean algebra A of size 2ω for which Irrmm(A) = ω.A subset X of a BA A is ideal independent iff x ∉ (X∖{x}〉id for all x ϵ X, where 〈X∖{x}〉id is the ideal generated by X∖{x}. Again, by Zorn's lemma there is always a maximal ideal independent subset of any Boolean algebra. We then consider two associated functions. A spectrum functionSspect(A) = {∣X∣: X is a maximal ideal independent subset of A}and the least element of this set, smm(A). We show that many sets of infinite cardinals can appear as Sspect(A). The relationship of Smm to similar “continuum cardinals” is investigated. It is shown that it is relatively consistent that Smm/fin) < 2ω.We use the letter s here because of the relationship of ideal independence with the well-known cardinal invariant spread; see Monk [5]. Namely, sup{∣X∣: X is ideal independent in A} is the same as the spread of the Stone space Ult(A); the spread of a topological space X is the supremum of cardinalities of discrete subspaces.

Nonisomorphism of lattices of recursively enumerable sets

1993 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 1177-1188 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Todd Hammond
Keyword(s):  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Isomorphism Class ◽  
Boolean Algebras ◽  
Turing Degree ◽  
Symmetric Difference ◽  
Natural Numbers ◽  
Recursively Enumerable ◽  
Recursively Enumerable Sets ◽  
Definition Of

Let ω be the set of natural numbers, let be the lattice of recursively enumerable subsets of ω, and let A be the lattice of subsets of ω which are recursively enumerable in A. If U, V ⊆ ω, put U =* V if the symmetric difference of U and V is finite.A natural and interesting question is then to discover what the relation is between the Turing degree of A and the isomorphism class of A. The first result of this form was by Lachlan, who proved [6] that there is a set A ⊆ ω such that A ≇ . He did this by finding a set A ⊆ ω and a set C ϵ A such that the structure ({W ϵ A∣W ⊇ C},∪,∩)/=* is a Boolean algebra and is not isomorphic to the structure ({W ϵ ∣W ⊇ D},∪,∩)/=* for any D ϵ . There is a nonrecursive ordinal which is recursive in the set A which he constructs, so his set A is not (see, for example, Shoenfield [11] for a definition of what it means for a set A ⊆ ω to be ). Feiner then improved this result substantially by proving [1] that for any B ⊆ ω, B′ ≇ B, where B′ is the Turing jump of B. To do this, he showed that for each X ⊆= ω there is a Boolean algebra which is but not and then applied a theorem of Lachlan [6] (definitions of and Boolean algebras will be given in §2). Feiner's result is of particular interest for the case B = ⊘, for it shows that the set A of Lachlan can actually be chosen to be arithmetical (in fact, ⊘′), answering a question that Lachlan posed in his paper. Little else has been known.

scholarly journals THE LINDENBAUM ALGEBRA OF THE THEORY OF THE CLASS OF ALL FINITE MODELS

2002 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. 145-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEFFEN LEMPP ◽  
MIKHAIL PERETYAT'KIN ◽  
REED SOLOMON
Keyword(s):  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Boolean Algebras ◽  
Quotient Algebra ◽  
First Order ◽  
Finite Models ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Recursive Isomorphism ◽  
Atomic Boolean Algebra

In this paper, we investigate the Lindenbaum algebra ℒ(T fin ) of the theory T fin = Th (M fin ) of the class M fin of all finite models of a finite rich signature. We prove that this algebra is an atomic Boolean algebra while its Gödel numeration γ is a [Formula: see text]-numeration. Moreover, the quotient algebra (ℒ(T fin )/ℱ, γ/ℱ) modulo the Fréchet ideal ℱ is a [Formula: see text]-algebra, which is universal over the class of all [Formula: see text] Boolean algebras. These conditions characterize uniquely the algebra ℒ(T fin ); moreover, these conditions characterize up to recursive isomorphism the numerated Boolean quotient algebra (ℒ(T fin )/ℱ, γ/ℱ). These results extend the work of Trakhtenbrot [17] and Vaught [18] on the first order theory of the class of all finite models of a finite rich signature.

Hierarchies of Boolean algebras

1970 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Feiner
Keyword(s):  
Number Theory ◽  
Standard Model ◽  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Boolean Algebras ◽  
Natural Numbers ◽  
Recursive Structure ◽  
The Standard Model ◽  
Free Generators ◽  
Basic Facts

A denumerable structure is said to be recursive iff its universe is a recursive subset of the natural numbers and its relations and operations are recursive. For example, the standard model of number theory is recursive. A structure is said to be recursively presentable iff it is isomorphic to a recursive structure. For example, a Boolean algebra generated by ℵ0 free generators is easily seen to be recursively presentable. (For basic facts concerning Boolean algebras, the reader is referred to R. Sikorski [9] and A. Tarski and A. Mostowski [10].)

R-maximal Boolean algebras

1979 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 533-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Remmel
Keyword(s):  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Vector Space ◽  
Boolean Algebras ◽  
Natural Numbers ◽  
Recursively Enumerable ◽  
Similarities And Differences

Metakides and Nerode in [2] suggested the study of what they termed the lattice of recursively enumerable substructures of a recursively presented model. For example, Metakides and Nerode in [3] introduced the lattice of of recusively enumerable subspaces, , of a recursively presented vector space V∞. The similarities and differences between and ℰ, the lattice of recursively enumerable subsets of the natural numbers N as defined in [9], have been studied by Metakides and Nerode, Kalantari, Remmel, Retzlaff, and Shore. In [6], we studied some similarities and differences between ℰ and the lattice of recursively enumerable sub-algebras of a weakly recursively presented Boolean algebra and this paper continues that study. A weakly recursively presented Boolean algebra (W.R.P.B.A.), , consists of a recursive subset of N, ∣∣, called the field of , and operations (meet), (join), and (complement) which are partial recursive and under which becomes a Boolean algebra. We shall write and for the zero and unit of . If S is a subset of , we let (S)* denote the subalgebra generated by S. Given sub-algebras B and C of , we let B + C denote (B ⋃ C)*. A subalgebra B of is recursively enumerable (recursive) if {x ∈ ∣∣ x ∈ B} is a recursively enumerable (recursive) subset of ∣∣. The set of all recursively enumerable subalgebras of , , forms a lattice under the operations of intersection and sum (+).

scholarly journals Concerning intrinsic topologies on Boolean algebras and certain bicompactly generated lattices

1970 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. Atherton
Keyword(s):  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Boolean Algebras ◽  
Order Topology ◽  
Complete Lattices ◽  
Ideal Topology ◽  
Atomic Boolean Algebra ◽  
The Ideal

This paper may be regarded as a continuation of the investigations begun in [2]; certain intrinsic lattice topologies are studied, especially the order and ideal topologies in Boolean algebras, bicompactly generated lattices, and other more general structures. The results of [1], [2], and [3] are shown to be closely related. It is proved that the ideal topology on any Boolean algebra has a closed subbase consisting of all sublattices, whereas the order topology on an atomic Boolean algebra has a closed subbase consisting of all sub-complete lattices. It is also shown that the order topology on an atomic Boolean algebra is autouniformizable (in the sense defined by Rema [3]) and, if the ground set is infinite, strictly coarser than the ideal topology. The conditions Cl and C3 on a lattice, introduced by Kent [1], are shown to be slightly stronger than the condition “ bicompactly generated ”, and in complete lattices, where these conditions are satisfied, the order topology is shown to be coarser than the ideal topology.

scholarly journals CHOICE-FREE STONE DUALITY

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-148
Author(s):  
NICK BEZHANISHVILI ◽  
WESLEY H. HOLLIDAY
Keyword(s):  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Boolean Algebras ◽  
Stone Space ◽  
Spectral Space ◽  
Topological Representation ◽  
Stone Duality ◽  
Closed Sets ◽  
Spectral Spaces ◽  
Basic Facts ◽  
Regular Open

AbstractThe standard topological representation of a Boolean algebra via the clopen sets of a Stone space requires a nonconstructive choice principle, equivalent to the Boolean Prime Ideal Theorem. In this article, we describe a choice-free topological representation of Boolean algebras. This representation uses a subclass of the spectral spaces that Stone used in his representation of distributive lattices via compact open sets. It also takes advantage of Tarski’s observation that the regular open sets of any topological space form a Boolean algebra. We prove without choice principles that any Boolean algebra arises from a special spectral space X via the compact regular open sets of X; these sets may also be described as those that are both compact open in X and regular open in the upset topology of the specialization order of X, allowing one to apply to an arbitrary Boolean algebra simple reasoning about regular opens of a separative poset. Our representation is therefore a mix of Stone and Tarski, with the two connected by Vietoris: the relevant spectral spaces also arise as the hyperspace of nonempty closed sets of a Stone space endowed with the upper Vietoris topology. This connection makes clear the relation between our point-set topological approach to choice-free Stone duality, which may be called the hyperspace approach, and a point-free approach to choice-free Stone duality using Stone locales. Unlike Stone’s representation of Boolean algebras via Stone spaces, our choice-free topological representation of Boolean algebras does not show that every Boolean algebra can be represented as a field of sets; but like Stone’s representation, it provides the benefit of a topological perspective on Boolean algebras, only now without choice. In addition to representation, we establish a choice-free dual equivalence between the category of Boolean algebras with Boolean homomorphisms and a subcategory of the category of spectral spaces with spectral maps. We show how this duality can be used to prove some basic facts about Boolean algebras.

On the elementary equivalence of automorphism groups of Boolean algebras; downward Skolem Löwenheim theorems and compactness of related quantifiers

1980 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matatyahu Rubin ◽  
Saharon Shelah
Keyword(s):  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Automorphism Groups ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
Boolean Algebras ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
Elementary Equivalence ◽  
First Order ◽  
Finite Models ◽  
Countably Compact

AbstractTheorem 1. (◊ℵ1,) If B is an infinite Boolean algebra (BA), then there is B1, such that ∣ Aut (B1) ≤∣B1∣ = ℵ1 and 〈B1, Aut (B1)〉 ≡ 〈B, Aut(B)〉.Theorem 2. (◊ℵ1) There is a countably compact logic stronger than first-order logic even on finite models.This partially answers a question of H. Friedman. These theorems appear in §§1 and 2.Theorem 3. (a) (◊ℵ1) If B is an atomic ℵ-saturated infinite BA, Ψ Є Lω1ω and 〈B, Aut (B)〉 ⊨Ψ then there is B1, Such that ∣Aut(B1)∣ ≤ ∣B1∣ =ℵ1, and 〈B1, Aut(B1)〉⊨Ψ. In particular if B is 1-homogeneous so is B1. (b) (a) holds for B = P(ω) even if we assume only CH.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document