J. D. Halpern. The independence of the axiom of choice from the Boolean prime ideal theorem. Fundamenta mathematicae, vol. 55 (1964), pp. 57–66.

1967 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-274
Author(s):  
Elliott Mendelson
Keyword(s):  
Prime Ideal ◽  
Axiom Of Choice ◽  
The Axiom Of Choice ◽  
Prime Ideal Theorem

Limitations on the Fraenkel-Mostowski method of independence proofs

1973 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 416-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Howard
Keyword(s):  
Prime Ideal ◽  
Axiom Of Choice ◽  
Finite Sets ◽  
Independence Results ◽  
The Axiom Of Choice ◽  
Weakened Form ◽  
Prime Ideal Theorem

AbstractThe Fraenkel-Mostowski method has been widely used to prove independence results among weak versions of the axiom of choice. In this paper it is shown that certain statements cannot be proved by this method. More specifically it is shown that in all Fraenkel-Mostowski models the following hold:1. The axiom of choice for sets of finite sets implies the axiom of choice for sets of well-orderable sets.2. The Boolean prime ideal theorem implies a weakened form of Sikorski's theorem.

The dense linear ordering principle

1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 438-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Pincus
Keyword(s):  
Prime Ideal ◽  
Set Theory ◽  
Ordered Set ◽  
Axiom Of Choice ◽  
Linear Ordering ◽  
Independence Result ◽  
The Axiom Of Choice ◽  
Infinite Set ◽  
Prime Ideal Theorem ◽  
The Way

AbstractLet DO denote the principle: Every infinite set has a dense linear ordering. DO is compared to other ordering principles such as O, the Linear Ordering principle, KW, the Kinna-Wagner Principle, and PI, the Prime Ideal Theorem, in ZF, Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory without AC, the Axiom of Choice.The main result is:Theorem. AC ⇒ KW ⇒ DO ⇒ O, and none of the implications is reversible in ZF + PI.The first and third implications and their irreversibilities were known. The middle one is new. Along the way other results of interest are established. O, while not quite implying DO, does imply that every set differs finitely from a densely ordered set. The independence result for ZF is reduced to one for Fraenkel-Mostowski models by showing that DO falls into two of the known classes of statements automatically transferable from Fraenkel-Mostowski to ZF models. Finally, the proof of PI in the Fraenkel-Mostowski model leads naturally to versions of the Ramsey and Ehrenfeucht-Mostowski theorems involving sets that are both ordered and colored.

On the strength of the Sikorski extension theorem for Boolean algebras

1983 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 841-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.L. Bell
Keyword(s):  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Prime Ideal ◽  
Extension Theorem ◽  
Boolean Algebras ◽  
Complete Boolean Algebra ◽  
The Axiom Of Choice ◽  
Universe Of Sets ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Boolean Extension ◽  
Prime Ideal Theorem

The Sikorski Extension Theorem [6] states that, for any Boolean algebra A and any complete Boolean algebra B, any homomorphism of a subalgebra of A into B can be extended to the whole of A. That is,Inj: Any complete Boolean algebra is injective (in the category of Boolean algebras).The proof of Inj uses the axiom of choice (AC); thus the implication AC → Inj can be proved in Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZF). On the other hand, the Boolean prime ideal theoremBPI: Every Boolean algebra contains a prime ideal (or, equivalently, an ultrafilter)may be equivalently stated as:The two element Boolean algebra 2 is injective,and so the implication Inj → BPI can be proved in ZF.In [3], Luxemburg surmises that this last implication cannot be reversed in ZF. It is the main purpose of this paper to show that this surmise is correct. We shall do this by showing that Inj implies that BPI holds in every Boolean extension of the universe of sets, and then invoking a recent result of Monro [5] to the effect that BPI does not yield this conclusion.

The Axiom of Choice Machine

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander R. Pruss
Keyword(s):  
Set Theory ◽  
Laws Of Nature ◽  
Axiom Of Choice ◽  
Dutch Book ◽  
The Axiom Of Choice

This is a mainly technical chapter concerning the causal embodiment of the Axiom of Choice from set theory. The Axiom of Choice powered a construction of an infinite fair lottery in Chapter 4 and a die-rolling strategy in Chapter 5. For those applications to work, there has to be a causally implementable (though perhaps not compatible with our laws of nature) way to implement the Axiom of Choice—and, for our purposes, it is ideal if that involves infinite causal histories, so the causal finitist can reject it. Such a construction is offered. Moreover, other paradoxes involving the Axiom of Choice are given, including two Dutch Book paradoxes connected with the Banach–Tarski paradox. Again, all this is argued to provide evidence for causal finitism.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document