Dana Scott and Patrick Suppes. Foundational aspects of theories of measurement. The Journal of symbolic logic, vol. 23 no. 2 (for 1958, pub. 1959), pp. 113–128. Reprinted in Readings in mathematical psychology, Volume I, edited by R. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush, and Eugene Galanter, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York and London 1963, pp. 212–227.

1968 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-288
Author(s):  
Robert L. Causey

R. A. Wollheim. F. H. Bradley. The revolution in philosophy, by A. J. Ayer, W. C. Kneale, G. A. Paul, D. F. Pears, P. F. Strawson, G. J. Warnock, and R. A. Wollheim, Macmillan & Co., London, and St. Martin's Press, New York, 1956, pp. 12–25. - R. A. Wollheim. F. H. Bradley. Spanish translation of the preceding by Montserrat Macao de Lledó. La revolución in filosofia, Biblioteca conocimiento del hombre, Revista de Occidente, Madrid1958, pp. 15–31. - G. A. Paul. G. E. Moore: Analysis, common usage, and common sense. La revolución in filosofia, Biblioteca conocimiento del hombre, Revista de Occidente, Madrid1958, pp. 56–69. - G. A. Paul. G. E. Moore: Análisis, uso común y sentido común. Spanish translation by Montserrat Macao de Lledó. La revolución in filosofia, Biblioteca conocimiento del hombre, Revista de Occidente, Madrid1958, pp. 69–86. - G. A. Paul. Wittgenstein. La revolución in filosofia, Biblioteca conocimiento del hombre, Revista de Occidente, Madrid1958, pp. 88–96. - G. A. Paul. Wittgenstein. Spanish translation by Montserrat Macao de Lledó. La revolución in filosofia, Biblioteca conocimiento del hombre, Revista de Occidente, Madrid1958, pp. 107–116. - G. J. Warnock. Analysis and imagination. La revolución in filosofia, Biblioteca conocimiento del hombre, Revista de Occidente, Madrid1958, pp. 111–126. - G. J. Warnock. Análisis e imaginación. Spanish translation by Montserrat Macao de Lledó. La revolución in filosofia, Biblioteca conocimiento del hombre, Revista de Occidente, Madrid1958, pp. 135–153. - Harold Newton Lee. Symbolic Logic. Random House, New York1961, ix + 356 pp.

1960 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-263
Author(s):  
Alan Ross Anderson

Perception ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1221-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest Greene

Naito and Cole [1994, in Contributions to Mathematical Psychology: Psychometrics and Methodology Eds G H Fischer and D Laming (New York: Springer)] provide a configuration which they describe as the Gravity Lens illusion. In this configuration, four small dots are presented in proximity to four large disks, and one is asked to compare the slope of an imaginary line which connects one pair of dots with the slope of a line which connects the other pair. In fact the slopes are the same, ie their axes are parallel, but because of the positioning of the large disks they appear to be at different orientations. Naito and Cole propose that the perceptual bias is analogous to the effects of gravity on the metrics of physical space, such that mental projections in the vicinity of a disk (or an open circle) are distorted just as the path of light is bent as it passes a massive body such as a star. Here we provide a simple test of this concept by having subjects judge alignments of dots which lie near tangents to a circle. Subjects were asked to project straight lines through pairs of stimulus dots, selecting and marking points in open space which were collinear with each pair. As would be predicted by the Gravity Lens theory, the locations selected by subjects were displaced from straight lines. However, the error magnitudes were substantially larger for judgments of dot pairs which had an oblique alignment, as compared with dot pairs which were aligned with a cardinal axis. This differential of effect as a function of stimulus orientation is not predicted by the gravity concept.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document