P. V. Kopnin and P. V. Tavaneć. Dialéktika i logika (Dialectic and logic). Dialéktika i logika, Zakony myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The laws of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 7–62. - B. M. Kédrov. Prédmét marksistskoj dialéktičéshoj logiki i égo otličié ot prédméta formal'noj logiki (The subject matter of Marxist dialectical logic and its difference from the subject matter of formal logic). Dialéktika i logika, Zakony myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The laws of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 63–137. - B. M. Kédrov. Zakony marksistskoj dialéktičéskoj logiki i ih otnošénié k zakonam formal'noj logiki (The laws of Marxist dialectical logic and their relation to the laws of formal logic). Dialéktika i logika, Zakony myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The laws of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 138–218. - V. A. Léktorskij and N. V. Karabanov. Ponátié toždéstva v formal'noj i dialéktičéshoj logiké (The concept of identity in formal and dialectical logic). Dialéktika i logika, Zakony myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The laws of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 219–266. - J. Eléz. Dialéktičéská i formal'naá logika ob obéktivnyh i subéktivnyh protivoréčiáh i kritérii ih različéniá (Dialectical and formal logic on objective and subjective contradictions and the criteria by which they are distinguished). Dialéktika i logika, Zakony myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The laws of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 267–307. - B. M. Kédrov. Nésvodimost' marksistskoj dialéktičéshoj traktovki protivorčéij k formal'nologičéskim shémam (The irreducibility of the Marxist dialectical treatment of contradictions to the schemata of formal logic). Dialéktika i logika, Zakony myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The laws of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 308–334.

1965 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-372
Author(s):  
David Dinsmore Comey
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Nauk Sssr ◽  
Formal Logic ◽  
Akademii Nauk Sssr ◽  
Dialectical Logic ◽  
The Subject

P. V. Tavanéc. O vidah suždéniá (On types of judgment). Izvéstiá Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Sériá istorii i filosofii, vol. 7 (1950), pp. 69–84. - P. V. Tavanéc. Kritika istolkovaniá prirody suždénij logikoj otnošénij (A critique of the interpretation of the nature of judgments in the logic of relations). Izvéstiá Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Sériá istorii i filosofii, vol. 7 (1950), pp. 360–372. - K. S. Bakradzé. K voprosu o sootnošénii logiki i dialéktiki (On the question of the relationship of logic to dialectic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 2 (1950), pp. 198–209. - V. I. Čérkésov. O logiké i marksistskoj dialéktiké (On logic and Marxist dialectic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 2 (1950), pp. 209–222. - M. S. Strogovič. O prédmété formal'noj logiki (On the subject matter of formal logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 3 (1950), pp. 309–317. - I. I. Os'makov. O logiké myšéniá i o nauké logiké (On the logic of thought and the science of logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 3 (1950), pp. 317–330. - P. S. Popov. Prédméi formal'noj logiki i dialéktika (Dialectic and the subject matter of formal logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 1 (1951), pp. 210–218. - N. V. Zavadskaá. K diskussii po voprosam logiki (On the discussion of questions of logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 1 (1951), pp. 218–222. - A. O. Makovél'skij. Čém, dolžna byt' logika kak nauka? (What should logic be as a science?) Voprosy filosofii, no. 2 (1951), pp. 179–181. - Dobrin Spasov. Dialéktičéskuú logiku nado né otricat', a razrabatyvat' (Dialectical logic should not be rejected but elaborated). Voprosy filosofii, no. 2 (1951), pp. 182–184. - M. N. Alékséév. Obsuždénié voprosov logiki v Moskovskom Gosudarstvénnom Univérsdtété (Discussion of questions of logic at the State University of Moscow). Voprosy filosofii, no. 2 (1951), pp. 184–192. - A. D. Aléksandrov. O logiké (On logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 3 (1951), pp. 152–163. - F. Á. Ostrouh. Protiv iskažéniá marksizma v voprosah logiki (Versus distortion of Marxism in questions of logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 3 (1951), pp. 164–173.

1952 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-128
Author(s):  
George L. Kline
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Nauk Sssr ◽  
Formal Logic ◽  
State University ◽  
Akademii Nauk Sssr ◽  
Dialectical Logic ◽  
Science Of Logic ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

D. P. Gorskij. Priménénié dialéktičéskoj logiki k izučéniú procéssov myšléniá (Application of dialectical logic to the study of thought processes). Dialéktika i logika, Formy myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The forms of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 5–41. - B. M. Kédrov. Opérirovanié naučnymi ponátiámi v dialéktičéskoj i formal'noj logiké (Operating with scientific concepts in dialectical and formal logic). Dialéktika i logika, Formy myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The forms of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 42–141. - I. G. Gérasimov. Analiz i sintéz v formal'noj logiké i dialéktiké (Analysis and synthesis in formal logic and dialectic). Dialéktika i logika, Formy myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The forms of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 142–171. - E. V. Il'enkov. Ponimanié abstraktnogo i konkrétnogo v dialéktiké i formal'noj logiké (Understanding abstract and concrete in dialectic and formal logic). Dialéktika i logika, Formy myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The forms of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 172–210. - L. P. Gokiéli. O dialéktičéskom haraktéré “korénnyh vyvodov” v logiké (On the dialectical character of “fundamental deductions” in logic). Dialéktika i logika, Formy myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The forms of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 211–222. - A. A. Zinov'év. Probléma stroéniá nauki v logiké i dialiktiké (The problem of the structure of science in logic and dialectic). Dialéktika i logika, Formy myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The forms of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 223–270. - B. M. Kédrov. Formal'nyé i dialéktičéskié principy klassifikacii nauk i obščaá struktura naučnogo znaniá (The formal and dialectical principles of classification of the sciences and the general structure of scientific knowledge). Dialéktika i logika, Formy myšléniá (Dialectic and logic, The forms of thought), Izdatél'stvo Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Moscow1962, pp. 271–310.

1965 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-373
Author(s):  
David Dinsmore Comey
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
General Structure ◽  
Nauk Sssr ◽  
Formal Logic ◽  
Thought Processes ◽  
Scientific Concepts ◽  
Akademii Nauk Sssr ◽  
Dialectical Logic ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis

scholarly journals Dialectical logic or logical dialectics? The Polish discussion on the principle of non-contradiction (1946–1957)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Woźniak
Keyword(s):  
Historical Development ◽  
Formal Logic ◽  
Dialectical Logic ◽  
Analytic Tradition ◽  
Polish Philosophy ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Concepts Of Knowledge

AbstractThe discussion on the principle of non-contradiction (1946–1957) between Marxist and non-Marxist philosophers was one of the major philosophical discussions in Polish philosophy of this period. In my text, I carefully reconstruct this discussion and outline its relation to Soviet debates on the subject. I show that the change in Schaff’s position happened in the early 1950s under the combined influence of the Lvov–Warsaw School and the changes in the official Soviet position regarding formal logic. I discuss the aftermath following Schaff’s change in attitude towards the analytic tradition for the development of Polish philosophy, as well as the critique of this change by Jarosław Ładosz. In my reconstruction of the latter, I focus on the problem of the historical development of science. I refer to Ilyenkov’s critique of Schaff, opposing synchronic (“positivist”) and diachronic (“dialectical”) concepts of knowledge. As I argue, these opposing concepts of science can be seen as a genuine issue at stake in the Polish discussion as well, especially in the polemic between Schaff and Ładosz.

Words

PMLA ◽  
1935 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 1320-1327
Author(s):  
Colbert Searles
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Assistant Professor ◽  
The Subject

THE germ of that which follows came into being many years ago in the days of my youth as a university instructor and assistant professor. It was generated by the then quite outspoken attitude of colleagues in the “exact sciences”; the sciences of which the subject-matter can be exactly weighed and measured and the force of its movements mathematically demonstrated. They assured us that the study of languages and literature had little or nothing scientific about it because: “It had no domain of concrete fact in which to work.” Ergo, the scientific spirit was theirs by a stroke of “efficacious grace” as it were. Ours was at best only a kind of “sufficient grace,” pleasant and even necessary to have, but which could, by no means ensure a reception among the elected.

The Taxonomic Structuring of Medical Information and its Usefulness in this Form

1965 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. 112-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Zinsser
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Central Core ◽  
Diagnostic Strategy ◽  
Programmed Instruction ◽  
Orderly Fashion ◽  
The Subject

An outline has been presented in historical fashion of the steps devised to organize the central core of medical information allowing the subject matter, the patient, to define the nature and the progression of the diseases from which he suffers, with and without therapy; and approaches have been made to organize this information in such fashion as to align the definitions in orderly fashion to teach both diagnostic strategy and the content of the diseases by programmed instruction.

العربية المقاربة المقاصديّة في ردّ ابن فودي على القادح في جلستهم الدعويّة

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alawiye Abdulmumin Abdurrazzaq ◽  
Ahmad Wifaq Mokhtar ◽  
Abdul Manan Ismail
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
West Africa ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Analytical Methods ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
The Subject

This article is aimed to examine the extent of the application of Islamic legal objectives by Sheikh Abdullah bn Fudi in his rejoinder against one of their contemporary scholars who accused them of being over-liberal about the religion. He claimed that there has been a careless intermingling of men and women in the preaching and counselling gathering they used to hold, under the leadership of Sheikh Uthman bn Fudi (the Islamic reformer of the nineteenth century in Nigeria and West Africa). Thus, in this study, the researchers seek to answer the following interrogations: who was Abdullah bn Fudi? who was their critic? what was the subject matter of the criticism? How did the rebutter get equipped with some guidelines of higher objectives of Sharĩʻah in his rejoinder to the critic? To this end, this study had tackled the questions afore-stated by using inductive, descriptive and analytical methods to identify the personalities involved, define and analyze some concepts and matters considered as the hub of the study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document