Stéphane Lupasco. Valeurs logiques et contradiction. Revue philosophique de la France et de l'Êtranger, vol. 135 (1945), pp. 1–31.

1946 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 134-134
Author(s):  
Charles A. Baylis
Keyword(s):  
Stéphane Lupasco

A PROPOS DE DEUX OUVRAGES DE M. STÉPHANE LUPASCO

dialectica ◽  
1947 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Gonseth
Keyword(s):  
Stéphane Lupasco

Un nouveau livre de Stéphane Lupasco

1967 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-131
Author(s):  
Ernest Kahane
Keyword(s):  
Stéphane Lupasco

Stéphane Lupasco, le surréalisme et le subréalisme

Topique ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Basarab Nicolescu
Keyword(s):  
Stéphane Lupasco

scholarly journals The Naturalization of Natural Philosophy

Philosophies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Brenner
Keyword(s):  
Propositional Logic ◽  
Physical Science ◽  
Original Work ◽  
Natural Philosophy ◽  
The Other ◽  
Philosophy Of Information ◽  
New Synthesis ◽  
Stéphane Lupasco ◽  
Potential Objection ◽  
Science Part

A new demarcation is proposed between Natural Philosophy and non-Natural Philosophy—philosophy tout court—based on whether or not they follow a non-standard logic of real processes. This non-propositional logic, Logic in Reality (LIR), is based on the original work of the Franco-Romanian thinker Stéphane Lupasco (Bucharest, 1900–Paris, 1988). Many Natural Philosophies remain bounded by dependence on binary linguistic concepts of logic. I claim that LIR can naturalize—bring into science—part of such philosophies. Against the potential objection that my approach blurs the distinction between science and philosophy, I reply that there is no problem in differentiating experimental physical science and philosophy; any complete distinction between philosophy, including the philosophy of science(s) and the other sciences is invidious. It was historically unnecessary and is unnecessary today. The convergence of science and philosophy, proposed by Wu Kun based on implications of the philosophy of information, supports this position. LIR provides a rigorous basis for giving equivalent ontological value to diversity and identity, what is contradictory, inconsistent, absent, missing or past, unconscious, incomplete, and fuzzy as to their positive counterparts. The naturalized Natural Philosophy resulting from the application of these principles is a candidate for the ‘new synthesis’ called for by the editors.

Stéphane Lupasco : vers la fin d'une noble marginalité

Sociétés ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph E. Brenner
Keyword(s):  
Stéphane Lupasco

scholarly journals Stéphane Lupasco et le tiers inclus

2005 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 431-441
Author(s):  
Basarab Nicolescu
Keyword(s):  
Stéphane Lupasco
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document