The Regime of Straits and the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea

1980 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Norton Moore
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
Foreseeable Future ◽  
Coastal Fisheries ◽  
The Third ◽  
State Practice ◽  
The Law ◽  
Deep Seabed Mining ◽  
Seabed Mining ◽  
Preparatory Work

The negotiations at the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea have been the most important catalyst of this century for a new legal and political order for the oceans. The conference, together with its preparatory work within the “Seabeds Committee,” has indelibly stamped ocean perspectives. Even without a widely acceptable, comprehensive treaty the influence of these perspectives on state practice will be profound—indeed, it already has been, for example, in legitimizing 200-mile coastal fisheries jurisdiction. If the conference is able to clear the remaining hurdles, particularly that of deep seabed mining, the new treaty is likely to govern oceans law for the foreseeable future.

scholarly journals The Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea: the 1976 New York Sessions

1977 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard H. Oxman
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
United Nations ◽  
International Law ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
Customary International Law ◽  
The Third ◽  
Geneva Conventions ◽  
State Practice ◽  
The Law

The law of the sea has changed, for good or for ill. The Revised Single Negotiating Text (hereinafter RSNT) issued in the spring of 1976 may prove to be the single most important document regarding the law of the sea since the 1958 Geneva Conventions in terms of its influence on state practice, whether by way of an ultimate treaty or otherwise. Important differences will exist regarding the extent to which portions of the text are declaratory of emerging customary international law and regarding the extent to which the text must be changed to be acceptable as a universal treaty or as customary law. Indeed, difficult questions of implementation of its principles in bilateral and other arrangements are already arising. Positions taken at multilateral conferences may differ from the positions taken in other contexts. But the text will not be ignored.

Developing a Business and Human Rights Treaty: Lessons from the Deep Seabed Mining Regime Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia BERNAZ ◽  
Irene PIETROPAOLI
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
Business And Human Rights ◽  
State Obligations ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
The Law ◽  
Deep Seabed Mining ◽  
Seabed Mining

AbstractThis article delves into the deep seabed mining regime under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) with a view to inform the negotiating process of the proposed business and human rights (BHR) treaty. It highlights points of convergence and divergence between the two regulatory regimes and explores how the BHR treaty negotiations could draw from the deep seabed mining regime with regard to the responsibility and liability of states and corporations. In particular, it suggests that a BHR treaty could incorporate some of the arrangements of UNCLOS to address state obligations and direct corporate human rights obligations, both of a general and specific nature, including the obligation to carry out human rights due diligence. The article also proposes a mechanism of responsibility and liability of states and corporations under the future BHR treaty going beyond UNCLOS and embracing residual liability for home and/or host states.

The Unity Status of Continental States’ Outlying Archipelagos

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 801-833
Author(s):  
Jinyuan Su
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
The Third ◽  
State Practice ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
The Law

Abstract This article argues that the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOSC) does not exhaust rules of baseline regimes; those for continental States’ outlying archipelagos were set aside for development outside the Convention by negotiating States during the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Today, most of the continental States possessing outlying archipelagos have applied the unity theory to such archipelagos, many by enclosing them with straight baselines, which has been protested by very few States. The application of straight baselines to big- island-dominating outlying archipelagos may be justifiable under the second limb of Article 7(1) of the LOSC or a customary rule that it reflects, thus causing a fragmentation of outlying archipelagos; however, this alternative justification remains hypothetical and, even if established, would not detract from the generality of State practice applying unity theory to outlying archipelagos without such geographical configuration.

La zone économique exclusive dans la pratique des États

1998 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 3-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Rigaldies
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Judicial Decisions ◽  
State Practice ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
The Law

SummaryThe use of the concept of an exclusive Economie zone has increased since the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. However, the characterization of this zone varies greatly between States. This article presents an exhaustive survey of the concept of an exclusive Economie zone. The author discusses the types of jurisdiction exercised by States in their uses of an exclusive Economie zone. Disparity exists between the provisions of the Convention and State practice in some specific areas: for example, the provisions on the environment and on scientific research. Despite these exceptions, the author maintains that the basic tenets of the Convention are respected in State practice. State declarations as well as arbitral and judicial decisions show that the Convention and State practice are together evolving to reinforce the basic principles of the concept of an exclusive Economie zone.

United States Interests in the Law of the Sea Convention

1994 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Multilateral Negotiations ◽  
The Third ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
The Law

In 1982 the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea adopted a treaty, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, that succeeded in resolving the most fundamental questions of the law of the sea in accordance with three basic principles: 1.The rules of the law of the sea must fairly balance the respective interests of all states, notably the competing coastal and maritime interests, in a manner that is generally acceptable.2.Multilateral negotiations on the basis of consensus replace unilateral claims of right as the principal means for determining that balance.3.Compulsory dispute settlement mechanisms should be adopted to interpret, apply, and enforce the balance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document