The Organization of American States: The Transition from an Unwritten to a Written Constitution

1965 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 315-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. G. Fenwick
Keyword(s):  
Organization Of American States ◽  
American States

The course of integration processes in Latin America through the prism of CELAC activities

2021 ◽  
pp. 234-242
Author(s):  
А.Е. Суглобов ◽  
О.Г. Карпович
Keyword(s):  
Latin America ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
People’S Republic Of China ◽  
Global Changes ◽  
People's Republic Of China ◽  
Organization Of American States ◽  
Republic Of China ◽  
American States ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Caribbean

В настоящей статье рассматриваются вопросы интеграционного развития в государствах Латинской Америки и Карибского бассейна с учетом новых глобальных изменений. Анализируются вопросы сотрудничества СЕЛАК с Российской Федерацией, Китайской Народной Республикой, Организацией американских государств. This article examines the issues of integration development in Latin America and the Caribbean, taking into account new global changes. The issues of cooperation between CELAC and the Russian Federation, the People's Republic of China, and the Organization of American States are analyzed.

Organization of American States

1956 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 659-663
Keyword(s):  
Costa Rica ◽  
Costa Rican ◽  
Foreign Affairs ◽  
Organization Of American States ◽  
Territorial Integrity ◽  
American States ◽  
The Government ◽  
Special Meeting

CouncilCosta Rica–Nicaragua Situation: At a special meeting of the Council on January 10, 1955, the representative of Costa Rica requested the Council to take action to protect Costa Rica's territorial integrity and sovereignty from intervention by the government of Nicaragua, by convoking a Meeting of Consultation of Ministers of Foreign Affairs, pursuant to Article 6 of the Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance, to act as Organ of Consultation in the matter. The Council had referred a similar request for action on April 21, 1954 back to the two countries for direct negotiations. The representative of Costa Rica charged that his country had tried to settle the dispute by direct negotiation and mediation, but that groups had meanwhile been trained and mobilized for invasion. The representative of Nicaragua stated in reply that the Costa Rican accusations were baseless and that President Figueros of Costa Rica was using them to rouse his people's patriotism and gain support for his regime. After prolonged discussion the Council decided to hold a meeting on January 12 to study the matter further and take suitable action; in the meantime the governments of Costa Rica and of Nicaragua were asked to refrain from acts likely to aggravate the controversy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document