Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law

1961 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-165
Author(s):  
Denys P. Myers
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
International Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
Department Of State ◽  
Secretary Of State ◽  
Contemporary Practice

The Yugoslav Ambassador, concerned particularly with statements in the case of Arbulich’s Estate, 41 Calif. 2d 86, 257 Pac. 2d 433 (1953), cert. denied, 346 U. S. 897, digested in 48 A.J.I.L. 670 (1954), handed a note to the Secretary of State on April 18,1958, in which he asked for the Department of State’s understanding of the scope of Article II of the convention of October 14, 1881, for “facilitating and developing the commercial relations” of the two countries. In a reply dated April 24,1958 (file 211.683/41958) the Department of State concurred in the interpretation of the Yugoslav Ambassador.

Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law

1994 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 312-336
Author(s):  
Marian Nash
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
International Law ◽  
District Of Columbia ◽  
The United States ◽  
Department Of State ◽  
Secretary Of State ◽  
Contemporary Practice

By two circular notes, both dated December 22, 1993, the Secretary of State informed the Chiefs of Mission at Washington,,first, of recently enacted congressional legislation related to nonpayment of parking fines or penalties owed to the District of Columbia, and second, of a new policy with respect to payment of parking tickets, effective January 1, 1994, that the Department of State had initiated in response to congressional concerns about the problem and in cooperation with the District of Columbia.

Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law

1969 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 312-336
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
International Law ◽  
Department Of Defense ◽  
The United States ◽  
General Counsel ◽  
Department Of State ◽  
Legal Adviser ◽  
Contemporary Practice

The material for this section is compiled by Stephen L. Gibson, attorney in the Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State. Jerome H. Silber, of the Office of the General Counsel, Department of Defense, has provided material originating in that Department.

Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law

1991 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-341
Author(s):  
Marian Nash Leich
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
International Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
Department Of State ◽  
Contemporary Practice

The material in this section is arranged according to the system employed in the annual Digest of United States Practice in International Law, published by the Department of State.

Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law

1988 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 336-350
Author(s):  
Marian Nash Leich
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
International Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
Department Of State ◽  
Contemporary Practice

The material in this section is arranged according to the system employed in the annual Digest of United States Practice in International Law, published by the Department of State.

Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law

1984 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 200-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian Nash Leich
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
International Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
Department Of State ◽  
Contemporary Practice

The material in this section is arranged according to the system employed in the annual Digest of United States Practice in International Law, published by the Department of State.

Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law

1992 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 346-362
Author(s):  
Marian Nash
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
International Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
Department Of State ◽  
Contemporary Practice

The material in this section is arranged according to the system employed in the annual Digest of United States Practice in International Law, published by the Department of State.

Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law

1978 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 879-922
Author(s):  
Marian L. Nash
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
International Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
Department Of State ◽  
Contemporary Practice

The material in this section is arranged according to the system employed in the annual Digest of United States Practice in International Law, published by the Department of State.

Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law

1989 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 348-352
Author(s):  
Marian Nash Leich
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
International Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
Department Of State ◽  
Contemporary Practice

The material in this section is arranged according to the system employed in the annual Digest of United States Practice in International Law, published by the Department of State.

Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law

1978 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Boyd
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
International Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
Department Of State ◽  
Contemporary Practice

The material in this section is arranged according to the system employed in the annual Digest of United States Practice in International Law, published by the Department of State.

Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law

1996 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-279
Author(s):  
Marian Nash ◽  
(Leich)
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Foreign Policy ◽  
International Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
Executive Branch ◽  
Department Of State ◽  
International Bank ◽  
Legal Adviser ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Contemporary Practice

In response to a request from the court to the Legal Adviser of the Department of State, by a letter dated November 29, 1995, the United States submitted a Statement of Interest in Meridien International Bank Ltd. v. Government of the Republic of Liberia. The United States stated that the executive branch had determined that allowing the (second) Liberian National Transitional Government (LNTG II) access to American courts was consistent with U.S. foreign policy. The court, the United States maintained, should therefore accord that Government standing to assert claims and defenses in the action on behalf of the Republic of Liberia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document