Geometry and Necessary Truth

1964 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Raymond D. Bradley
Keyword(s):  
Synthese ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 194 (4) ◽  
pp. 1219-1231
Author(s):  
Jordan Stein
Keyword(s):  

Mind ◽  
1949 ◽  
Vol LVIII (230) ◽  
pp. 164-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHEN TOULMIN
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Colin McGinn

This chapter explores philosophical issues in metaphysics. It begins by distinguishing between de re and de dicto necessity. All necessity is uniformly de re; there is simply no such thing as de dicto necessity. Indeed, in the glory days of positivism, all necessity was understood as uniformly the same: a necessary truth was always an a priori truth, while contingent truths were always a posteriori. The chapter then assesses the concept of antirealism. Antirealism is always an error theory: there is some sort of mistake or distortion or sloppiness embedded in the usual discourse. The chapter also considers paradoxes, causation, conceptual analysis, scientific mysteries, the possible worlds theory of modality, the concept of a person, the nature of existence, and logic and propositions.


2019 ◽  
pp. 270-308
Author(s):  
Sanford Shieh

This chapter examines how Russell came to reject modality on the basis of his rejection of idealism. Russell’s anti-modal views rest on the Moore-Russell theory of propositions, not on Russell’s attack on internal relations. This theory derives from Moore’s criticisms of Bradley’s theory of judgment. Unlike most readers of Moore, who find these criticisms mostly unpersuasive, I show that, in fact, they present a substantial challenge to Bradley. Moore uses the theory of propositions that he adopts to remedy the defects of Bradley’s theory of judgment to argue, against Kant, that all true propositions are necessarily true. For Russell, Moore’s argument demonstrates that there is no distinction between truth and necessary truth, nor between truth and possible truth, which is to say, amodalism.


Author(s):  
John R. Dakers

If a deep and meaningful understanding of Information Technology is to flourish, we need, as educators, to create an ethos in which students can express themselves in a risk-free environment. In order to promote higher-order thinking skills, we must move from the single-expert view to a more collaborative classroom. In information technology, there are controversies and different solutions to problems: Students need to be helped to understand the arguments from different points of view, and to see how they relate to each other. The development of technological literacy, as well as life skills, will be accelerated through the use of argumentation skills such as debating, justifying an opinion, weighing up conflicting points of view and analyzing disagreements. These skills that are inextricably linked to problem-solving skills, may be assessed in dynamic and exciting ways, such as observation, interaction, group work and challenge. Arguments may be grounded on common knowledge, personal knowledge, testimony, plausibility and necessary truth. These philosophies are essential to understanding both the made world and the new electronic age.


1955 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Weiss
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-30
Author(s):  
Joshua Rasmussen ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document