The First Amendment and the Future of American Democracy.

1977 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 323
Author(s):  
David Fellman ◽  
Walter Berns
Keyword(s):  
First Amendment ◽  
American Democracy ◽  
The Future

The First Amendment and the Future of American Democracy

Thought ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-108
Author(s):  
Francis Canavan ◽  
Keyword(s):  
First Amendment ◽  
American Democracy ◽  
The Future

The First Amendment and the Future of American Democracy

1977 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 431
Author(s):  
Neil D. McFeeley ◽  
Walter Berns
Keyword(s):  
First Amendment ◽  
American Democracy ◽  
The Future

Insurrectionary Populism? Assessing the January 6 Attack on the U.S. Capitol

Populism ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-145
Author(s):  
Lane Crothers ◽  
Grace Burgener
Keyword(s):  
Political Culture ◽  
American Democracy ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Future ◽  
The U.S

Abstract The attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 was extraordinary. Analysts and commentators quickly attributed the attack as having been motivated by “populism” without much nuance or recognition of the diversity of voices and attitudes embedded in the insurrection. This commentary assesses the populist ideas and attitudes expressed by the insurrectionists in an effort to understand why they felt drawn to Washington, D.C. that day, as well as why they felt their attack on the U.S. Capitol was legitimate. In so doing, it addresses the particular ways the insurrectionists framed and legitimated their attack (at least to themselves). The January 6 insurrection was an extraordinary attack on American democracy, but it was related to deep themes and elements of US political culture. Understanding those dynamics is crucial to preventing such attacks in the future.

English Speaking Countries and the Culture of Fear

2017 ◽  
pp. 92-110
Author(s):  
Maximiliano Emanuel Korstanje
Keyword(s):  
Use Of Force ◽  
American Democracy ◽  
Temporal Effects ◽  
The Future ◽  
Culture Of Fear ◽  
English Speaking

The direct intervention or full-scare led wars are ideologically legitimized by the needs of bringing the ideals of American democracy, liberty, freedom and mobility. However, at the bottom, this globalized culture of fear hidden dark interests associated to exploitation. Paradoxically, these types of interventions suggest that terrorism needs the use of force, but in so doing, impotence and deprivation surface. Undoubtedly, Anglo and Latin worlds have created, according to their cultural matrices, diverse tactics to adapt to environment, as the form of understanding the future. While Anglo-countries developed a fascinating attraction to risk and future, the sense of predestination alludes to what today has not occurred yet. Technology only helps to mitigate the temporal effects of uncertainty triggered by the orientation to future.

English Speaking Countries and the Culture of Fear

2020 ◽  
pp. 42-55
Author(s):  
Maximiliano Emanuel Korstanje
Keyword(s):  
Use Of Force ◽  
American Democracy ◽  
Temporal Effects ◽  
The Future ◽  
Culture Of Fear ◽  
English Speaking

The direct intervention or full-scare led wars are ideologically legitimized by the needs of bringing the ideals of American democracy, liberty, freedom and mobility. However, at the bottom, this globalized culture of fear hidden dark interests associated to exploitation. Paradoxically, these types of interventions suggest that terrorism needs the use of force, but in so doing, impotence and deprivation surface. Undoubtedly, Anglo and Latin worlds have created, according to their cultural matrices, diverse tactics to adapt to environment, as the form of understanding the future. While Anglo-countries developed a fascinating attraction to risk and future, the sense of predestination alludes to what today has not occurred yet. Technology only helps to mitigate the temporal effects of uncertainty triggered by the orientation to future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document