A Strong Form of the Phragmen-Brouwer Theorem

1984 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 333
Author(s):  
R. F. Dickman
Keyword(s):  
Strong Form ◽  
Brouwer Theorem

Saussurelaisen kielikäsityksen kritiikki

Virittäjä ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikko Laasanen
Keyword(s):  
Communication System ◽  
Written Language ◽  
Strong Form ◽  
Continuous Speech ◽  
Language Bias ◽  
Context Free ◽  
Ontological Concept

Artikkeli käsittelee saussurelaista kielikäsitystä kohtaan esitettyä kritiikkiä. Artikkelin tavoitteena on puolustaa saussurelaista kielikäsitystä ja esittää Saussure moni-puolisempana ajattelijana kuin mitä Kurssin vahvasti strukturalisesta luennasta voisi päätellä. Artikkelissa tarkastellaan käsitystä kielestä järjestelmänä (Saussuren langue), kontekstivapaata merkitystä, kirjoitetun kielen vääristymää (written language bias), Roy Harrisin kielimyyttiä sekä kielen dynaamisuutta. Artikkelissa esitetään, että langue on sekä metodologinen että ontologinen käsite, joka viittaa sekä kielen järjestäytymättömiin sääntöihin että kielitieteilijän niistä luomaan järjestelmään. Kontekstivapaan merkityksen osalta korostetaan sitä, että jonkinlainen merkityksen pysyvyys on välttämätön osa kieltä kommunikaatiojärjestelmänä. Artikkelissa argumentoidaan kirjoitetun kielen vääristymän vahvaa muotoa vastaan, jonka mukaan esimerkiksi puheen analysoiminen diskreeteiksi yksiköiksi johtuu kirjoitetun kielen vaikutuksesta. Harrisin kielimyytin osalta esitetään, että kyse ei ole Saussuren näkemyksistä vaan Harrisin tulkinnoista. Artikkelissa esitetään myös, että dynaamisuus ei ole yhteensopimaton käsite saussurelaisen kielikäsityksen kanssa.   On the critique of the Saussurean concept of language: some perspectives and counter-arguments The article deals with the critique of the Saussurean concept of language. The purpose of the article is to defend the Saussurean concept of language and to present Saussure as a more versatile thinker than may be assumed from a purely structuralist reading of Course. The article discusses the concept of language as a system (Saussure’s langue), the notion of context-free meaning, the so-called written-language bias, Roy Harris’ language myth, and the notion of dynamicity in language in relation to the Saussurean concept of language. The article begins by arguing that langue is both a methodological and an ontological concept that refers both to the unorganised rules of language and to the system of language rules as organised by the linguist. Second, the author asserts that some kind of permanence of meaning is essential to the concept of language as a communication system. Third, an argument is presented against the strong form of written-language bias, according to which, for instance, the analysis and reduction of continuous speech into discrete units is based on the model of written language. Fourth, the author posits that the language myth, developed by Harris, is not based on Saussure’s views but on Harris’ interpretation of Saussure’s views. The article ends with the contention that the notion of dynamicity is not incompatible with the Saussurean concept of language.

scholarly journals R-continuous functions

1992 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ch. Konstadilaki-Savvapoulou ◽  
D. Janković
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Functions ◽  
Strong Form ◽  
Topological Spaces ◽  
Strong Continuity ◽  
Closed Graph ◽  
Continuity Properties

A strong form of continuity of functions between topological spaces is introduced and studied. It is shown that in many known results, especially closed graph theorems, functions under consideration areR-continuous. Several results in the literature concerning strong continuity properties are generalized and/or improved.

Positive and Negative Constitutionalism and the Limits of Universalism: A Review Essay†

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrienne Stone ◽  
Lael K Weis
Keyword(s):  
Review Essay ◽  
Weak Form ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Strong Form ◽  
Constitutional Theory ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
Essential Function

Abstract In The Principles of Constitutionalism, Nicholas Barber provides a sophisticated yet highly readable introduction to fundamental constitutional principles. At the same time, Barber seeks to reorient constitutional theory scholarship away from a mistaken ‘negative’ understanding of constitutionalism towards a ‘positive’ understanding. This essay examines that argument. We suggest that the idea of ‘positive constitutionalism’ has a weaker and a stronger sense. In its weak form, the argument calls for greater attention to what constitutions enable as well as what they restrict, and thus serves as a welcome reminder of the full potential of constitutional principles. However, it cannot be regarded as the correction of a widespread mistake. In its strong form, the argument calls for greater recognition that the state’s essential function lies in advancing the ‘well-being’ of its members. Although this amounts to a significant reorientation, it weakens the theory’s claim to universalism. These tensions indicate limitations to efforts to construct general theories of constitutionalism.

Weak-Form and Semi-Strong-Form Stock Return Predictability Revisited

2005 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
pp. 1582-1592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne E. Ferson ◽  
Andrea Heuson ◽  
Tie Su
Keyword(s):  
Stock Return ◽  
Weak Form ◽  
Return Predictability ◽  
Strong Form ◽  
Stock Return Predictability
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document