Spatially Explicit Population Models

1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Ronald Pulliam ◽  
John B. Dunning
Keyword(s):  
Population Models ◽  
Spatially Explicit

Uncertainty in spatially explicit population models

2008 ◽  
Vol 141 (4) ◽  
pp. 956-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.S. Minor ◽  
R.I. McDonald ◽  
E.A. Treml ◽  
D.L. Urban
Keyword(s):  
Population Models ◽  
Spatially Explicit

Incorporating citizen science data in spatially explicit integrated population models

Ecology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine C. Sun ◽  
J. Andrew Royle ◽  
Angela K. Fuller
Keyword(s):  
Citizen Science ◽  
Population Models ◽  
Spatially Explicit ◽  
Science Data

Spatially Explicit Population Models: Current Forms and Future Uses

1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
John B. Dunning ◽  
David J. Stewart ◽  
Brent J. Danielson ◽  
Barry R. Noon ◽  
Terry L. Root ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Population Models ◽  
Spatially Explicit

Incorporating behavior-based indices of connectivity into spatially explicit population models

2012 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.E. Rizkalla ◽  
R.K. Swihart
Keyword(s):  
Population Models ◽  
Spatially Explicit ◽  
Patch Occupancy ◽  
Ecological Processes ◽  
Forest Patch ◽  
Fragmented Landscapes ◽  
Direct Observations ◽  
Behavior Based ◽  
Potential Methods ◽  
Parameter Values

Measuring connectivity in fragmented landscapes remains a central problem in ecology. Connectivity metrics range from descriptors of landscape structure to direct observations of a species’ ability to move to and colonize a forest patch. We constructed individual-based spatially explicit population models for a guild of forest rodents in Indiana to test the ability of structural and actual, or behavioral, measures of connectivity to predict patch and landscape occupancy and abundance. Model accuracy was assessed using comparisons with data from trapping studies. Predicted abundances within patches correlated with empirical data for five out of six species, but predicted patterns of patch occupancy corresponded with observations for only one species. Discrepancies may be due to inaccurate parameter values or the absence from the models of ecological processes such as conspecific attraction and competition. Nonetheless, the models demonstrated the utility of patch immigration as a measure of connectivity in explaining population abundance in fragmented landscapes. We discuss potential methods of collecting these behavior-based data.

Finding the perfect mismatch: Evaluating misspecification of population structure within spatially explicit integrated population models

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelyn M. Bosley ◽  
Amy M. Schueller ◽  
Daniel R. Goethel ◽  
Dana H. Hanselman ◽  
Kari H. Fenske ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Population Structure ◽  
Population Models ◽  
Spatially Explicit

Spatially explicit integrated population models

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 1351-1360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Chandler ◽  
Joseph D. Clark
Keyword(s):  
Population Models ◽  
Spatially Explicit
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document