Chesapeake Bay Watershed Historical Land Use: Impact on Water Quality and Diatom Communities

1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 703-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherri Rumer Cooper
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (Special issue 1) ◽  
pp. 11-21
Author(s):  
KALYANI SUPRIYA ◽  
R K AGGARWAL ◽  
S K BHARDWAJ

Landuse alteration is one of the primary causes of global environmental change. Changes in the landuse usually occurred regionally and globally over last few decades and will carry on in the future as well. These activities are highly influenced by anthropogenic activities and have more serious consequences on the quality of water and air. In the present study relationship between land use impact on water and air quality have been reviewed.


Author(s):  
Michael J. Langland ◽  
Jeff P. Raffensperger ◽  
Douglas Moyer ◽  
Jurate M. Landwehr ◽  
Gregory E. Schwarz

2020 ◽  
Vol 737 ◽  
pp. 139800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moriken Camara ◽  
Nor Rohaizah Jamil ◽  
Ahmad Fikri Bin Abdullah ◽  
Rohasliney binti Hashim ◽  
Adamu Gaddafi Aliyu

1992 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 2675-2683 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Correll ◽  
T. E. Jordan ◽  
D. E. Weller

Extensive research on Chesapeake Bay estuary, its drainage basin, and its airshed have now demonstrated that atmospheric deposition and diffuse land discharges are the largest sources for many parameters affecting estuarine water quality. For example, phosphorus and sediments are transported to the Bay largely in overland storm flows, nitrate largely in atmospheric deposition and in ground water, many pesticides and other toxic materials in surface waters and atmospheric deposition, and silicate primarily in ground water. Concerns over point sources such as sewage treatment outfalls and industrial outfalls have led to greatly improved treatment methods, alleviating the relative magnitude of these sources. The realization of the magnitude and importance of diffuse sources has led to research on improved land use practices, including better patterns of land use in the Chesapeake Bay landscape. One example is the use of and improved management of forested riparian buffer zones in the coastal plain part of the drainage basin.


Author(s):  
Scott J. Goetz ◽  
Claire A. Jantz ◽  
Stephen D. Prince ◽  
Andrew J. Smith ◽  
Dmitry Varlyguin ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 1239-1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darrell J. Bosch ◽  
Moges B. Wagena ◽  
Andrew C. Ross ◽  
Amy S. Collick ◽  
Zachary M. Easton

Water Policy ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 758-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca R. Gasper ◽  
Mindy Selman ◽  
Matthias Ruth

Water quality markets are gaining worldwide popularity as strategies to provide flexibility and cost savings to sources managing pollution. One prominent example is the establishment of water quality trading programs in the Chesapeake Bay watershed in the United States to manage nonpoint and point source pollution. Some of the agricultural land use practices that can be used to generate offsets in water quality markets in this region have other environmental benefits including greenhouse gas (GHG) sequestration. This study describes the structure of Maryland's water quality trading program, its climate co-benefits and its potential link with GHG markets. Results reveal that Maryland's agricultural sector could offset half of its GHG emissions by 2020 through projects primarily designed to improve water quality. The potential opportunity for agricultural sources to participate in multiple markets could provide incentives for the adoption of management practices that have climate co-benefits. The results of this study could guide the continued development of multiple markets in the Bay watershed and other regions of the world where ecosystem markets play a role in pollution management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document