Tables of the Non-Central t-Distribution (Density-Function, Cumulative Distribution Function and Percentage Points)

Econometrica ◽  
1958 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 631
Author(s):  
N. L. Johnson ◽  
George J. Resnikoff ◽  
Gerald J. Lieberman
1969 ◽  
Vol 6 (02) ◽  
pp. 442-448
Author(s):  
Lionel Weiss

Suppose Q 1 ⋆, … Q n ⋆ are independent, identically distributed random variables, each with probability density function f(x), cumulative distribution function F(x), where F(1) – F(0) = 1, f(x) is continuous in the open interval (0, 1) and continuous on the right at x = 0 and on the left at x = 1, and there exists a positive C such that f(x) > C for all x in (0, l). f(0) is defined as f(0+), f(1) is defined as f(1–).


2021 ◽  
pp. 35-53
Author(s):  
Johan Fellman

Analyses of income data are often based on assumptions concerning theoretical distributions. In this study, we apply statistical analyses, but ignore specific distribution models. The main income data sets considered in this study are taxable income in Finland (2009) and household income in Australia (1967-1968). Our intention is to compare statistical analyses performed without assumptions of the theoretical models with earlier results based on specific models. We have presented the central objects, probability density function, cumulative distribution function, the Lorenz curve, the derivative of the Lorenz curve, the Gini index and the Pietra index. The trapezium rule, Simpson´s rule, the regression model and the difference quotients yield comparable results for the Finnish data, but for the Australian data the differences are marked. For the Australian data, the discrepancies are caused by limited data. JEL classification numbers: D31, D63, E64. Keywords: Cumulative distribution function, Probability density function, Mean, quantiles, Lorenz curve, Gini coefficient, Pietra index, Robin Hood index, Trapezium rule, Simpson´s rule, Regression models, Difference quotients, Derivative of Lorenz curve


2012 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT STEWART ◽  
HONG ZHANG

AbstractGiven a rectangle containing uniformly distributed random points, how far are the points from the rectangle’s centre? In this paper we provide closed-form expressions for the cumulative distribution function and probability density function that characterise the distance. An expression for the average distance to the centre of the rectangle is also provided.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 7431-7438
Author(s):  
Nasr Ibrahim Rashwan

In this paper, the probability density function and the cumulative distribution function of the rth order statistic arising from independent nonidentically distributed (INID) Lomax, exponential Lomax and exponential Pareto variables are presented. The moments of order statistics from INID Lomax, exponential lomax and exponential Pareto were derived using the technique established by Barakat and Abdelkader. Also, numerical examples are given.


Author(s):  
Oleg Gradov ◽  
Eugene Adamovich ◽  
Serge Pankratov

Evolution of bioacoustic correlometers: from setups for analysis of probability density function (PDF), cumulative distribution function (CDF), [spectral] entropy of signal (SE) & quality of masking noise (QMN) to palmtop-like pocket devices Novel references:


1969 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 442-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Weiss

Suppose Q1⋆, … Qn⋆ are independent, identically distributed random variables, each with probability density function f(x), cumulative distribution function F(x), where F(1) – F(0) = 1, f(x) is continuous in the open interval (0, 1) and continuous on the right at x = 0 and on the left at x = 1, and there exists a positive C such that f(x) > C for all x in (0, l). f(0) is defined as f(0+), f(1) is defined as f(1–).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document