The Magician, the Witch, and the Law

1979 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 1030
Author(s):  
Martha E. Francois ◽  
Edward Peters.
Keyword(s):  
The Law ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-315
Author(s):  
Lawrence F. Barmann
Keyword(s):  
The Law ◽  

1979 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 197-199
Author(s):  
David Harry Miller
Keyword(s):  
The Law ◽  

1981 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-506
Author(s):  
Brian P Copenhaver
Keyword(s):  
The Law ◽  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-296
Author(s):  
Rukundo Solomon

AbstractPeople believed to be witches have been killed in many parts of Africa since precolonial times. Belief in witchcraft persists today among many people, occasionally resulting in the killing of the suspected witch. The killer views witchcraft as an attack similar in nature to the use of physical force and therefore kills the witch in an attempt to end the perceived attack. As it stands today, the law in Uganda fails to strike a balance between the rights of the deceased victim violated through murder and those of the accused who honestly believes that he or she or a loved one was a victim of witchcraft. This article argues that the defenses that are currently available—mistake of fact, self-defense, insanity, and provocation by witchcraft—are insufficient, as they fail to strike that delicate balance. A more pragmatic approach to the issue of witch-killing, one that deals with the elimination of belief in witchcraft, is necessary.


1981 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 361
Author(s):  
Brian P. Levack ◽  
Edward Peters
Keyword(s):  
The Law ◽  

1979 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 338
Author(s):  
E. William Monter ◽  
Edward Peters
Keyword(s):  
The Law ◽  

Speculum ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 828-829
Author(s):  
Richard Kieckhefer
Keyword(s):  
The Law ◽  

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Leslie ◽  
Mary Casper

“My patient refuses thickened liquids, should I discharge them from my caseload?” A version of this question appears at least weekly on the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Community pages. People talk of respecting the patient's right to be non-compliant with speech-language pathology recommendations. We challenge use of the word “respect” and calling a patient “non-compliant” in the same sentence: does use of the latter term preclude the former? In this article we will share our reflections on why we are interested in these so called “ethical challenges” from a personal case level to what our professional duty requires of us. Our proposal is that the problems that we encounter are less to do with ethical or moral puzzles and usually due to inadequate communication. We will outline resources that clinicians may use to support their work from what seems to be a straightforward case to those that are mired in complexity. And we will tackle fears and facts regarding litigation and the law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document