Shadow Prices in Public Program Evaluation Models

1974 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
Corry F. Azzi ◽  
James C. Cox
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Shadow Prices ◽  
Public Program ◽  
Evaluation Models

scholarly journals A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICACY OF THREE PROGRAM-EVALUATION MODELS –A REVIEW ON THEIR IMPLICATION IN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 326-336
Author(s):  
Zafar Iqbal ◽  
Muhammad Anees ◽  
Rahim Khan ◽  
Abdul Wadood ◽  
Shakila Malik
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Educational Programs ◽  
Comparative Efficacy ◽  
Scholarly Journals ◽  
Cipp Model ◽  
Evaluation Models ◽  
High Standards ◽  
Kirkpatrick’S Model

Purpose of the study: This article reviews the comparative efficacy, theoretical and practical background of three program evaluation models (Stufflebeam’s CIPP model, Kirkpatrick’s model, and outcome-based evaluation models) and their implications in educational programs. The article discusses the strengths and limitations of the three evaluation models. Methodology: Peer-reviewed and scholarly journals were searched for articles related to program evaluation models and their importance. Keywords included program evaluation’, ‘assessment’, ‘CIPP model’, ‘evaluation of educational programs, ‘outcome-based model, and ‘planning’. Articles on Stufflebeam’s CIPP model, Kirkpatrick’s model, and outcome-based evaluation models were particularlyfocused because the review aimed at analysing these three models. The strengths and inadequacies of the three models were weighed and presented. Main Findings: The three models –outcome-based evaluation model, the Kirkpatric model, and the CIPP evaluation model –discussed in this review, have some strengths and weaknesses. Among the compared models, the CIPP model seems more appropriate for its implantation in evaluating educational programs because it is broader, comprehensive, flexible, cost-effective, and feasible. Applications of this study: Like other programs and projects, evaluation of educational programs is necessary to achieve high standards, better outcomes, and meet the objectives. Evaluation is employed before designing a particular educational program or during the already designed program. This review concludes that among different evaluation models, the CIPP evaluation model is more appropriate in evaluating educational programs because it is more comprehensive, efficient, and feasible.Employment of the CIPP model for evaluating educational programs can achieve plausible results about the overall progress of the educational programs. Novelty/Originality of this study: This review highlights the importance of different program evaluation models. It concludes that the CIPP evaluation model offers an excellent mechanism to evaluate educational programs at different stages.

scholarly journals EVALUASI PROGRAM MA’HAD ALJAMIAH IAIN SULTHAN THAHA SAIFUDDIN JAMBI (PENERAPAN MODEL CIPP DAN DEM)

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-50
Author(s):  
Zawaqi Afdal Jamil
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Lesson Plans ◽  
Learning Performance ◽  
Evaluation Result ◽  
Learning Plan ◽  
Evaluation Models ◽  
Library Book ◽  
The Way

The objective of this study is to investigate the implementation effectivity of Ma’had alJamiah Program in IAIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi. The design of the study is evaluative survey by applying CIPP and DEM evaluation models. In this research, the evaluation result level is devided into five categories, that are: very good, good, moderate, fair, and not applicative program. The result of the study is Ma’had alJamiah Program included in moderate category. Some reasons for stating the program included in this category are the college does not have any permanent clasrooms, students’  desks and chairs, library, book references, and mosque. Ma’had alJamiah does not have specific curriculum in learning process program. Most of the lecturers do not make learning plan. They do not evaluate students’ learning performance, both theory and application in the way of doing practice worship. Based on the results of the study it is recommended to the leaders of Al-Jami'ah Ma'had to fulfil infrastructure the college and remind the lecturers to prepare lesson plans and carry out the evaluation of both theory and application in the way of doing practice worship learning.   Keywords program evaluation, Ma’had alJamiah, cipp and dem models

scholarly journals EVALUATION MODELS IN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vo Thi Kim Anh
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
20Th Century ◽  
21St Century ◽  
Educational Program ◽  
Educational Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Models ◽  
Free Model ◽  
Objective Model ◽  
Educational Program Evaluation ◽  
Over Time

In the 21st century, evaluation in education has been paid great attention and the evaluation models in education which were created in the 20th century have been further developed and widely applied in educational evaluation. The paper provides readers with comprehensive discussions on the four well-known evaluation models in education: Tyler’s objective model, Stake’s responsive model, Scriven’s goal free model and Stufebeam’s CIPP model. These models have a long history and have been thoroughly developed over time. The application of these four models is found in many felds of evaluation, but mostly in educational program evaluation. In order to help educational evaluators have better and deeper understandings of the four models, the paper presents the nature of the models, the characteristics of the models, as well as discusses strengths and weaknesses of each model.

Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE Guide No. 67

2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. e288-e299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann W. Frye ◽  
Paul A. Hemmer
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Models

scholarly journals PENILAIAN PELAKSANAAN KURIKULUM MATA PELAJARAN SAINS RUMAH TANGGA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL STAKE COUNTENANCE: SATU KAJIAN LITERATUR

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Nor Asimah Zakaria
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Science Education ◽  
Educational Program ◽  
Curriculum Implementation ◽  
Implementation Evaluation ◽  
Quantitative And Qualitative Research ◽  
Evaluation Models ◽  
Core Concepts ◽  
Educational Program Evaluation

The purpose of this concept paper was to discuss and analysis evaluation models using in the curriculum implementation or educational program evaluation. This paper focused on secondry school home science education subject and Stake Countenance Model. This model focused on congruence between what was intended to occur and what was actually observed to occur before, during, and after curriculum implementation. The Stake Countenance Model used antecedents, transactions and outcomes as a core concepts to structure the view of the curriculum implementation evaluation or an educational program evaluation. The Stake model demonstrated its effectiveness by facilitating a thorough examination of both quantitative and qualitative research method.Kertas konsep ini adalah bertujuan untuk membincangkan dan menganalisis model penilaian yang digunakan dalam penilaian pelaksanaan kurikulum atau program pendidikan. Kertas konsep ini memberi tumpuan kepada Mata Pelajaran Sains Rumah Tangga sekolah menengah yang diajar pada peringkat menengah atas dan Model Stake Countenance. Model ini membincangkan dua matrik iaitu matrik deskripsi dan matrik pertimbangan yang memberi tumpuan kepada kepada kesesuaian antara apa yang dirancang untuk berlaku dan apa yang sebenarnya berlaku semasa perlaksanaan dengan melakukan pemerhatian sebelum, semasa, dan selepas pelaksanaan seseuatu kurikulum atau program pendidikan. Model Stake Countenance membincangkan tiga fasa pengumpulan data; masukan, proses dan hasil sebagai teras konsep dalam penilaian pelaksanaan kurikulum atau penilaian program pendidikan. Model Stake menunjukkan keberkesanannya dengan memudahkan penilai membuat pertimbangan menyeluruh dengan menggunakan kaedah penyelidikan kuantitatif atau kualitatif.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document