scholarly journals LIFE HISTORY AND PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS OF THE NEMERTEANPARANEMERTES PEREGRINACOE

1976 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAMELA ROE
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 287 (1928) ◽  
pp. 20200652
Author(s):  
Johannes Cairns ◽  
Felix Moerman ◽  
Emanuel A. Fronhofer ◽  
Florian Altermatt ◽  
Teppo Hiltunen

Predator–prey interactions heavily influence the dynamics of many ecosystems. An increasing body of evidence suggests that rapid evolution and coevolution can alter these interactions, with important ecological implications, by acting on traits determining fitness, including reproduction, anti-predatory defence and foraging efficiency. However, most studies to date have focused only on evolution in the prey species, and the predator traits in (co)evolving systems remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated changes in predator traits after approximately 600 generations in a predator–prey (ciliate–bacteria) evolutionary experiment. Predators independently evolved on seven different prey species, allowing generalization of the predator's evolutionary response. We used highly resolved automated image analysis to quantify changes in predator life history, morphology and behaviour. Consistent with previous studies, we found that prey evolution impaired growth of the predator, although the effect depended on the prey species. By contrast, predator evolution did not cause a clear increase in predator growth when feeding on ancestral prey. However, predator evolution affected morphology and behaviour, increasing size, speed and directionality of movement, which have all been linked to higher prey search efficiency. These results show that in (co)evolving systems, predator adaptation can occur in traits relevant to foraging efficiency without translating into an increased ability of the predator to grow on the ancestral prey type.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Šmejkal ◽  
Roman Baran ◽  
Petr Blabolil ◽  
Lukáš Vejřík ◽  
Marie Prchalová ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 97 (8) ◽  
pp. 929-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria L. Musumeci ◽  
Kenneth W. Able ◽  
Mark C. Sullivan ◽  
Jennifer M. Smith

2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Shuter ◽  
Henrique C. Giacomini ◽  
Derrick de Kerckhove ◽  
Kris Vascotto

A bioenergetic framework is developed to predict optimal life history responses to environmentally driven changes in the rate of energy production by a predator. This framework is used to predict the responses of age at maturation, size at maturation, and asymptotic size to changes in the predator–prey size ratio. Predators feeding on relatively smaller prey (i.e., having larger predator–prey size ratios) have lower growth efficiency and are predicted as a consequence to mature earlier, at smaller sizes, and reach smaller asymptotic sizes. This prediction was tested using a 78-year time series (1936–2013) of data from a natural population of lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) in Lake Opeongo, Algonquin Park, Ontario, Canada. A large decrease in the predator–prey size ratio for this population occurred over the period 1950–1965 when a preferred prey (cisco, Coregonus artedii) was introduced to the lake. This decrease was followed by ∼20 years of constancy in the size ratio and then 25 years of progressive increase. Lake trout life history responded plastically during both periods and consistently with our predictions. Extensive analysis of available data provided little empirical support for alternative explanations for the observed changes in lake trout size and maturity (e.g., changes in cisco and (or) lake trout density and harvest rates). The framework developed here derives plastic life history changes from fixed developmental thresholds that are based on the scaling of net production with body size and can be used to predict the shape of maturation reaction norms for the major shifts in community structure that are compactly summarized by changes in size spectrum parameters.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 4747-4757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huan Zhang ◽  
Pablo Urrutia-Cordero ◽  
Liang He ◽  
Hong Geng ◽  
Fernando Chaguaceda ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Graeme D. Ruxton ◽  
William L. Allen ◽  
Thomas N. Sherratt ◽  
Michael P. Speed

In this chapter we consider defences that are usually deployed during, or just before, contact between a prey and its predator: so-called ‘secondary’ defences. Secondary defences are found right across the tree of life and therefore come in very many forms, including: 1.) chemical defences; 2.) mechanical defences; and 3.) behavioural defences. Here we review selected examples that provide useful illustrations of the ecological and evolutionary characteristics associated with secondary defences. We discuss costs of secondary defences, placing emphasis on the consequences of such costs, especially as they relate to forms of social interaction. We show also that the acquisition of secondary defences may modify niche, life history, and habitat range of prey animals and review a well-known and significant study of predator–prey co-evolution of defensive toxins of prey and resistance to those toxins in predators. We include a small selection of examples and ideas from the plant and microbe defence literature where we think a broader perspective is helpful. We begin the chapter by considering the evolutionary mechanisms that favour secondary defence evolution.


1979 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur L. Buikema Jr. ◽  
Ernest F. Benfield

Life history information of macroinvertebrates is an important variable to consider when interpreting the results of toxicity tests. The importance of life history information has been recognized in the culturing of macroinvertebrates, but only in the last 5 yr has emphasis been placed on using this information in the design of acute and chronic toxicity tests. Sensitivity of organisms to toxicants is affected by nutrition, physiological requirements, behavior, predator–prey interactions, substrate, current, and light. There is need to integrate these, and other variables, to produce more defensible tests. Some features of life history may be used as end points in tests. Key words: macroinvertebrates, life history, toxicity, tests, design, sensitivity


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document