The Effects of Illustrations on the Reading Performance of Learning Disabled and Normal Children

1983 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean R. Harber
Keyword(s):  
Test Score ◽  
Detrimental Effect ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Intelligence Test ◽  
Instructional Materials ◽  
Chronological Age ◽  
Normal Children ◽  
Disabled Students ◽  
Normally Achieving

This study examined the effect of three illustration conditions — no illustrations, complete illustrations, and partial illustrations — on the reading performance of learning disabled and normally achieving children. With the effects of chronological age and intelligence test score controlled, illustrations were found to exert a detrimental effect on the learning disabled subjects' performance but a beneficial effect on the performance of normally achieving subjects. Findings are discussed as they relate to the selection and/or adaptation of instructional materials for learning disabled students.

The Language of Instructional Materials: A Source of Reading Problems

1982 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra McCormick ◽  
Alden J. Moe
Keyword(s):  
Reading Instruction ◽  
Oral Language ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Written Language ◽  
Instructional Materials ◽  
Disabled Students ◽  
Reading Abilities ◽  
Reading Materials ◽  
Sentence Patterns

A discussion of the effects of lack of congruency between children's language and the written language of reading materials is presented. The premise that written language is simply “talk written down” is challenged. Differences between these two forms of language in sentence patterns, vocabulary, intonation, and context exist. Failure to take into account the mismatch between oral language and written language can result in inaccurate assessment of the reading abilities of children and can affect their reading performance. Implications for reading instruction of learning disabled students are suggested by the differences in these two language forms.

Relative Effects of Two Previewing Procedures on LD Adolescents' Oral Reading Performance

1984 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry L. Rose ◽  
Lee Sherry
Keyword(s):  
Junior High School ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Disabled Students ◽  
Alternating Treatments Design ◽  
Assigned Reading ◽  
Instructional Procedures ◽  
Student Reading ◽  
School Learning

An alternating-treatments design was used to investigate the relative effects of two oral reading previewing procedures: (a) silent: the student reads silently the assigned reading passage prior to reading it aloud, and (b) listening: the teacher reads the assigned selection aloud with the student following along silently prior to the student reading the passage aloud. Five junior-high school learning disabled students, four boys and one girl, participated in the study. In four of five cases results showed that systematic prepractice procedures were related to higher performance levels than was baseline (no prepractice). Differential effects were noted: the listening procedure was related to higher rates of words read correctly than was the silent procedure. The findings are discussed in terms of their implications for research and instructional procedures, especially as these relate to adolescent learners.

Differentiating LD and Normal Children: The Utility of Selected Perceptual and Perceptual-Motor Tests

1979 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean R. Harber
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disability ◽  
Normative Data ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Chronological Age ◽  
Normal Children ◽  
Motor Functioning ◽  
Perceptual Functioning ◽  
Motor Tests ◽  
Iq Scores ◽  
Age Range

Instruments intended to measure perceptual functioning present a major thrust in the learning disability field for differentiating learning disabled from normal peers. This investigation is an attempt to improve on some of the limitations noted in other research efforts in this area. First, only instruments which are generally accepted as measures of perceptual and perceptual-motor functioning were used. Second, in order to avoid ceiling effects, all subjects were within the age range for which normative data on the selected instruments were available. Third, IQ scores and chronological age were partialled out in order to remove the effects of these variables.

Performance of Students with Learning Disabilities on Validity Indexes of the Perception of Ability Scale for Students

1992 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Chapman ◽  
Frederic J. Boersma
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Learning Problems ◽  
Response Patterns ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Regular Form ◽  
Disabled Students ◽  
Normally Achieving ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Response Biases

The present study examined the performance of 78 students with learning disabilities and 71 normally achieving students in regular Form 1 (Grade 6) classes on three validity indexes of the Perception of Ability Scale for Students, a measure of academic self-concept. The three indexes assess consistency of responding, negative or positive response biases, and misrepresentation of self-perceptions in terms of unrealistic perceptions of perfection in school. Analysis showed that learning disabled students obtained significantly lower Full Scale scores than the normal students, but no significant differences appeared on the three validity indexes. Users of the test can be confident that learning disabled students respond to items in as valid a manner as other students. Having specific learning problems in school should not interfere with response patterns on this scale.

Differential Effects of Four Comprehension-Facilitating Conditions on LD and Normal Elementary-School Readers

1982 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanna W. Pflaum ◽  
Ernest T. Pascarella ◽  
Carol Auer ◽  
Linda Augustyn ◽  
Mary Boswick
Keyword(s):  
Elementary School ◽  
Prior Knowledge ◽  
Word Identification ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Average Effect ◽  
Normal Children ◽  
Normally Achieving ◽  
School Learning ◽  
Micro Level ◽  
Facilitating Conditions

Ninety-nine elementary-school learning disabled and normal children were assigned to one of four comprehension-facilitating conditions (word identification and meaning aids, sentence aids, purpose-setting aids, and prior-knowledge aids) to determine their effects on comprehension. Controlling for age, intelligence, prior reading achievement, and pretest comprehension levels, sentence aids were found to be significantly more effective than prior knowledge for both learning disabled and similarly achieving, but younger readers. Moreover, for the same two groups of subjects the average effect of words and sentences (micro-level aids) was significantly higher than the average effect of purpose setting and prior knowledge (macro-level aids). No significant differences were found among the four types of comprehension facilitators for normally achieving readers who were the same age as the learning disabled group.

Auditory and Visual Vigilance in Normal and Learning Disabled Readers

1980 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Lee Swanson
Keyword(s):  
Performance Test ◽  
Continuous Performance Test ◽  
Visual Presentation ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Continuous Performance ◽  
Disabled Children ◽  
Normal Children ◽  
Reading Deficiencies ◽  
Disabled Readers

The Continuous Performance Test was administered to normal and learning disabled males (CA 12.5) to test the proposition that learning disabled children manifest an attention deficit related to reading performance. Children were tested on two task lengths (4.45 and 9.30 minutes) and two modalities (auditory and visual) in which dependent measures were correct detections and false responses. As expected, learning disabled children with reading deficiencies made significantly fewer correct detections and more false responses than did normal children. There was no strong evidence to indicate that a visual presentation provided better attention for learning disabled children. Results were interpreted as supporting the notion that learning disabled readers are underattentive to critical stimuli.

Correlations of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, and Slosson Intelligence Test for a Group of Learning Disabled Students

1979 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 735-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert “Booney” Vance ◽  
Rena Lewis ◽  
Susan De Bell
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Intelligence Test ◽  
Vocabulary Test ◽  
Peabody Picture Vocabulary ◽  
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test ◽  
Disabled Students ◽  
Intelligence Scale ◽  
Verbal Scale ◽  
The Mean ◽  
And Performance

This study compared scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, and Slosson intelligence test for 64 students (45 boys, 19 girls) who ranged in age from 7–3 to 13–2. Mean IQ on the Peabody was significantly higher than the mean IQ on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised and on the Slosson. The mean IQs were 95.0 for the Peabody, 89 0 for the Slosson, and 87.8 for the Wechsler Full Scale, with standard deviations of 12.3, 11.7, and 7.0, respectively. Highest correlations of IQs were between Verbal Scale of the Wechsler and the Slosson (.81) and between the Verbal and Performance Scales of the WISC-R (.73).

WISC and WISC-R Profiles of Learning Disabled Children: A Review

1981 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis C. Dudley-Marling ◽  
Nancy J. Kaufman ◽  
Sara G. Tarver
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Disabled Children ◽  
Normal Children ◽  
Disabled Students ◽  
Verbal Iq ◽  
Verbal Performance

It has been widely assumed that learning disabled children exhibit a characteristic WISC or WISC-R profile. This paper reviews 24 studies investigating the performance of disabled learners on these instruments. Three questions were addressed in the review of these studies: 1) Is high Performance IQ-low Verbal IQ characteristic of learning disabled children? 2) Do learning disabled subjects exhibit more WISC (or WISC-R) subtest scatter than normal learners? and 3) Do learning disabled subjects exhibit a characteristic WISC(-R) profile? The evidence regarding the first two questions was inconclusive although Verbal-Performance IQ discrepancies and subtest variability may not be uncommon in normal children. The evidence does suggest that LD children, as a group, exhibit a characteristic WISC(-R) profile whereas few individual LD children actually conform to this pattern. It was concluded that WISC(-R) profiles may not be useful for differential diagnosis of learning disabled students.

A comparison of normally achieving, mildly retarded, and learning disabled students on a perceptually based oddity task

1993 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia S. Scott ◽  
Ruth Perou ◽  
Daryl Greenfield ◽  
Mary F. Partridge ◽  
Leslie J. Swanson
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Disabled Students ◽  
Oddity Task ◽  
Normally Achieving
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document