Spelling Ability of Reading Disabled LD Students and Able Readers

1982 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale Carpenter ◽  
Lamoine J. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disability ◽  
Disability Services ◽  
Chronological Age ◽  
Disabled Students ◽  
Reading Deficiencies ◽  
Spelling Ability ◽  
Recognition Ability ◽  
Two Populations ◽  
Reading Disabled

The present study investigated differences in the spelling ability of two populations of elementary pupils: reading disabled students receiving learning disability services and able readers. Subjects consisted of three groups totaling 107 children. Pupils were matched on reading recognition ability with intelligence controlled for. Results revealed that reading disabled pupils differed from able readers of the same chronological age in phonetic spelling ability, nonphonetic spelling ability, and recognition spelling ability. It was concluded that the spelling ability of school-identified students with severe reading deficiencies was significantly inferior to that of reading able students.

Systemic working in learning disability services: a UK wide survey

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gurpreet Kaur ◽  
Katrina Scior ◽  
Suzanne Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disability ◽  
Disability Services

scholarly journals Commentary on “Who’s Challenging Who?: a co-produced approach for training staff in learning disability services about challenging behaviour”

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 200-203
Author(s):  
Mark Andrew Haydon-Laurelut ◽  
Karl Nunkoosing
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disability ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Psychological Research ◽  
Disability Services ◽  
Challenging Behaviour ◽  
Social Psychological ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Systemic Practice ◽  
Social Psychological Research

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a commentary on the article by Flynn et al. Design/methodology/approach In this commentary, the authors will develop some further thoughts about the importance of empathy, its relational nature and place in practice. The authors use some examples from systemic practice to illustrate. Findings Social psychological research underlines the importance of empathy in practice. Systemic practice and other collaborative approaches that ask about the experiences and abilities of people with a learning disability and their networks can support new possibilities as network members are listened to, included and respected. Originality/value The relational nature of empathy and its connection with practice is explored in this paper.

Learning Disabilities and the Professional Educator

1978 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Larsen
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Learning Disability ◽  
Educational Practice ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Ethical Practice ◽  
Disabled Students ◽  
Professional Educator

Dr. Stephen Larsen, President of D.C.L.D., has identified four central issues in the learning disability field as they relate to the educator: 1) determining the true parameters of the learning disabilities field; 2) monitoring the proliferation of tests and materials presumed relevant to educational practice; 3) insuring that learning disabled students are provided instructional opportunities in accordance with their educational needs and civil rights; and 4) determining professional standards that are necessary for competent and ethical practice. The professional educator is seen as the central person in the resolution of these issues as well as the central professional in planning, conducting, and/or coordinating the overall diagnostic and remedial efforts used with the learning disabled individual.

Differentiating LD and Normal Children: The Utility of Selected Perceptual and Perceptual-Motor Tests

1979 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean R. Harber
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disability ◽  
Normative Data ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Chronological Age ◽  
Normal Children ◽  
Motor Functioning ◽  
Perceptual Functioning ◽  
Motor Tests ◽  
Iq Scores ◽  
Age Range

Instruments intended to measure perceptual functioning present a major thrust in the learning disability field for differentiating learning disabled from normal peers. This investigation is an attempt to improve on some of the limitations noted in other research efforts in this area. First, only instruments which are generally accepted as measures of perceptual and perceptual-motor functioning were used. Second, in order to avoid ceiling effects, all subjects were within the age range for which normative data on the selected instruments were available. Third, IQ scores and chronological age were partialled out in order to remove the effects of these variables.

scholarly journals Service provision in Scotland for people with an intellectual disability who have, or are at risk of developing, dementia

Dementia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 736-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen McKenzie ◽  
Dale Metcalfe ◽  
Amanda Michie ◽  
George Murray
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Learning Disability ◽  
Service Provision ◽  
Disability Services ◽  
Health Board ◽  
Common Elements ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Community Learning ◽  
Direct Assessment

This research aimed to identify current national provision by health services in Scotland in relation to proactive screening and reactive assessment for people with an intellectual disability in Scotland who have, or are at risk of developing, dementia. Staff from 12 intellectual disability services, representing the 11 health board areas in Scotland, completed an online questionnaire which asked about proactive screening and reactive assessment for people with intellectual disability who had, or were at risk of developing, dementia as well as suggested areas for improvement. All of the areas provided services for people with intellectual disability who have, or are at risk of developing, dementia, but differed as to whether this was reactive, proactive or both. Nine services offered intervention following diagnosis. The most common elements used across both proactive screening and reactive assessment were conducting a health check, using a general dementia questionnaire designed for people with an intellectual disability and direct assessment with the person. Clinical psychology and community learning disability nurses were the professions most likely to be involved routinely in both proactive screening and reactive assessments. The psychometric properties of the most commonly used assessments of cognitive and behavioural functioning were mixed. The areas of improvement suggested by practitioners mainly related to ways of improving existing pathways. This research represents the first step in providing an overview of service provision in Scotland. There was some inconsistency in relation to the general and specific components which were involved in proactive screening and reactive assessment. Implications for service provision are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document