Factors Affecting Strandings of Cold-Stunned Juvenile Kemp's Ridley and Loggerhead Sea Turtles in Long Island, New York

Copeia ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 1991 (4) ◽  
pp. 1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent J. Burke ◽  
Edward A. Standora ◽  
Stephen J. Morreale
Copeia ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 1993 (4) ◽  
pp. 1176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent J. Burke ◽  
Edward A. Standora ◽  
Stephen J. Morreale

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 133-143
Author(s):  
NJ Robinson ◽  
K Deguzman ◽  
L Bonacci-Sullivan ◽  
RA DiGiovanni ◽  
T Pinou

Wildlife rehabilitation programs are widely employed for many endangered marine species and can serve as engaging platforms for environmental outreach. However, their effectiveness at supporting populations in the wild depends on whether rescued animals can survive and reproduce after being released. Here, we assessed whether cold-stunned juvenile sea turtles resumed typical migratory and diving behaviors after rehabilitation. We deployed satellite transmitters onto 7 rehabilitated loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta, 12 green turtles Chelonia mydas, and 12 Kemp’s ridley turtles Lepidochelys kempii released around Long Island, New York, USA. Of these 31 turtles, 30 were tracked long enough to determine their migratory movements. The majority (83%) left Long Island before local waters dropped below 14°C and avoided being cold-stunned. Most individuals followed migratory routes previously reported for each of the 3 species, migrating to either coastal waters off the southeast USA or oceanic waters of the Gulf Stream. Rehabilitated turtles of each species also resumed typical diving patterns. Four of the remaining 5 turtles that did not migrate away from Long Island were likely cold-stunned again. Overall, most cold-stunned sea turtles tend to resume typical migratory and diving behavior post-rehabilitation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Doherty ◽  
Julie A. Heath

2000 ◽  
Vol 78 (11) ◽  
pp. 1941-1947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa A Hoopes ◽  
André M Landry Jr. ◽  
Erich K Stabenau

Blood samples were collected from 58 wild Kemp's ridley sea turtles (Lepidochelys kempii) to examine the physiological effects of capture in entanglement nets. Captured turtles were placed in holding tanks or in-water cages to examine whether the postcapture holding protocol influenced the time course of recovery of blood homeostasis. Lactate concentrations at capture were 4.5 ± 0.3 and 3.5 ± 0.3 mmol/L (mean ± SE) for L. kempii assigned to the in-water-cage and holding-tank treatments, respectively. Turtles held in holding tanks for 1 h exhibited a significant increase in lactate concentration over capture levels, whereas lactate concentrations in the cage-held animals did not change. Lactate concentrations declined to less than 1.0 mmol/L by 6 and 10 h post capture for turtles in the in-water-cage and holding-tank treatments, respectively. Plasma norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E) concentrations at capture were substantially elevated above base-line levels reported in the literature for comparably sized loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta). Turtles in holding tanks exhibited greater reductions in NE and E at 1 h post capture than did their counterparts in the in-water cages. Although plasma Na+ and Cl- concentrations were not affected by entanglement netting, K+ concentration was elevated in tank-held L. kempii at 1 h post capture. Taken together, these data indicate that entanglement netting causes significant physiological disturbance in sea turtles and that recovery of blood homeostasis is influenced by the postcapture holding protocol.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. e0229800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia E. Kunze ◽  
Justin R. Perrault ◽  
Yu-Mei Chang ◽  
Charles A. Manire ◽  
Samantha Clark ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. e38472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Allan Ditmer ◽  
Seth Patrick Stapleton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document