Optimal selection based on relative ranks with a random number of individuals

1979 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 720-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Gianini-Pettitt

In one version of the familiar ‘secretary problem’, n rankable individuals appear sequentially in random order, and a selection procedure (stopping rule) is found to minimize the expected rank of the individual selected. It is assumed here that, instead of being a fixed integer n, the total number of individuals present is a bounded random variable N, of known distribution. The form of the optimal stopping rule is given, and for N belonging to a certain class of distributions, depending on n, and such that E(N) → ∞ as n → ∞, some asymptotic results concerning the minimal expected rank are given.

1979 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 720-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Gianini-Pettitt

In one version of the familiar ‘secretary problem’, n rankable individuals appear sequentially in random order, and a selection procedure (stopping rule) is found to minimize the expected rank of the individual selected. It is assumed here that, instead of being a fixed integer n, the total number of individuals present is a bounded random variable N, of known distribution. The form of the optimal stopping rule is given, and for N belonging to a certain class of distributions, depending on n, and such that E(N) → ∞ as n → ∞, some asymptotic results concerning the minimal expected rank are given.


2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (04) ◽  
pp. 1028-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsushi Tamaki

As a version of the secretary problem, Ferguson, Hardwick and Tamaki (1992) considered an optimal stopping problem called the duration problem. The basic duration problem is the classical duration problem, in which the objective is to maximize the time of possession of a relatively best object when a known number of rankable objects appear in random order. In this paper we generalize this classical problem in two directions by allowing the number N (of available objects) to be a random variable with a known upper bound n and also allowing the objects to appear in accordance with Bernoulli trials. Two models can be considered for our random horizon duration problem according to whether the planning horizon is N or n. Since the form of the optimal rule is in general complicated, our main concern is to give to each model a sufficient condition for the optimal rule to be simple. For N having a uniform, generalized uniform, or curtailed geometric distribution, the optimal rule is shown to be simple in the so-called secretary case. The asymptotic results, as n → ∞, will also be given for these priors.


2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 1028-1048
Author(s):  
Mitsushi Tamaki

As a version of the secretary problem, Ferguson, Hardwick and Tamaki (1992) considered an optimal stopping problem called the duration problem. The basic duration problem is the classical duration problem, in which the objective is to maximize the time of possession of a relatively best object when a known number of rankable objects appear in random order. In this paper we generalize this classical problem in two directions by allowing the number N (of available objects) to be a random variable with a known upper bound n and also allowing the objects to appear in accordance with Bernoulli trials. Two models can be considered for our random horizon duration problem according to whether the planning horizon is N or n. Since the form of the optimal rule is in general complicated, our main concern is to give to each model a sufficient condition for the optimal rule to be simple. For N having a uniform, generalized uniform, or curtailed geometric distribution, the optimal rule is shown to be simple in the so-called secretary case. The asymptotic results, as n → ∞, will also be given for these priors.


2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 726-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsushi Tamaki

Abstract The best-choice problem and the duration problem, known as versions of the secretary problem, are concerned with choosing an object from those that appear sequentially. Let (B,p) denote the best-choice problem and (D,p) the duration problem when the total number N of objects is a bounded random variable with prior p=(p1, p2,...,pn) for a known upper bound n. Gnedin (2005) discovered the correspondence relation between these two quite different optimal stopping problems. That is, for any given prior p, there exists another prior q such that (D,p) is equivalent to (B,q). In this paper, motivated by his discovery, we attempt to find the alternate correspondence {p(m),m≥0}, i.e. an infinite sequence of priors such that (D,p(m-1)) is equivalent to (B,p(m)) for all m≥1, starting with p(0)=(0,...,0,1). To be more precise, the duration problem is distinguished into (D1,p) or (D2,p), referred to as model 1 or model 2, depending on whether the planning horizon is N or n. The aforementioned problem is model 1. For model 2 as well, we can find the similar alternate correspondence {p[m],m≥ 0}. We treat both the no-information model and the full-information model and examine the limiting behaviors of their optimal rules and optimal values related to the alternate correspondences as n→∞. A generalization of the no-information model is given. It is worth mentioning that the alternate correspondences for model 1 and model 2 are respectively related to the urn sampling models without replacement and with replacement.


1973 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 739-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Brockwell ◽  
W. H. Kuo

A supercritical age-dependent branching process is considered in which the lifespan of each individual is composed of four phases whose durations have joint probability density f(x1, x2, x3, x4). Starting with a single individual of age zero at time zero we consider the asymptotic behaviour as t→ ∞ of the random variable Z(4) (a0,…, an, t) defined as the number of individuals in phase 4 at time t for which the elapsed phase durations Y01,…, Y04,…, Yi1,…, Yi4,…, Yn4 of the individual itself and its first n ancestors satisfy the inequalities Yij ≦ aij, i = 0,…, n, j = 1,…, 4. The application of the results to the analysis of cell-labelling experiments is described. Finally we state an analogous result which defines (conditional on eventual non-extinction of the population) the asymptotic joint distribution of the phase and elapsed phase durations of an individual drawn at random from the population and the phase durations of its ancestors.


2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (03) ◽  
pp. 761-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsushi Tamaki

We consider the optimal stopping problem of maximizing the probability of stopping on any of the last m successes of a sequence of independent Bernoulli trials of length n, where m and n are predetermined integers such that 1 ≤ m < n. The optimal stopping rule of this problem has a nice interpretation, that is, it stops on the first success for which the sum of the m-fold multiplicative odds of success for the future trials is less than or equal to 1. This result can be viewed as a generalization of Bruss' (2000) odds theorem. Application will be made to the secretary problem. For more generality, we extend the problem in several directions in the same manner that Ferguson (2008) used to extend the odds theorem. We apply this extended result to the full-information analogue of the secretary problem, and derive the optimal stopping rule and the probability of win explicitly. The asymptotic results, as n tends to ∞, are also obtained via the planar Poisson process approach.


2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 761-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsushi Tamaki

We consider the optimal stopping problem of maximizing the probability of stopping on any of the last m successes of a sequence of independent Bernoulli trials of length n, where m and n are predetermined integers such that 1 ≤ m < n. The optimal stopping rule of this problem has a nice interpretation, that is, it stops on the first success for which the sum of the m-fold multiplicative odds of success for the future trials is less than or equal to 1. This result can be viewed as a generalization of Bruss' (2000) odds theorem. Application will be made to the secretary problem. For more generality, we extend the problem in several directions in the same manner that Ferguson (2008) used to extend the odds theorem. We apply this extended result to the full-information analogue of the secretary problem, and derive the optimal stopping rule and the probability of win explicitly. The asymptotic results, as n tends to ∞, are also obtained via the planar Poisson process approach.


1973 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 739-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Brockwell ◽  
W. H. Kuo

A supercritical age-dependent branching process is considered in which the lifespan of each individual is composed of four phases whose durations have joint probability density f(x 1, x 2, x 3, x 4). Starting with a single individual of age zero at time zero we consider the asymptotic behaviour as t→ ∞ of the random variable Z (4) (a 0,…, a n , t) defined as the number of individuals in phase 4 at time t for which the elapsed phase durations Y 01,…, Y 04,…, Yi 1,…, Yi 4,…, Yn 4 of the individual itself and its first n ancestors satisfy the inequalities Yij ≦ aij , i = 0,…, n, j = 1,…, 4. The application of the results to the analysis of cell-labelling experiments is described. Finally we state an analogous result which defines (conditional on eventual non-extinction of the population) the asymptotic joint distribution of the phase and elapsed phase durations of an individual drawn at random from the population and the phase durations of its ancestors.


Author(s):  
José Correa ◽  
Paul Dütting ◽  
Felix Fischer ◽  
Kevin Schewior

A central object of study in optimal stopping theory is the single-choice prophet inequality for independent and identically distributed random variables: given a sequence of random variables [Formula: see text] drawn independently from the same distribution, the goal is to choose a stopping time τ such that for the maximum value of α and for all distributions, [Formula: see text]. What makes this problem challenging is that the decision whether [Formula: see text] may only depend on the values of the random variables [Formula: see text] and on the distribution F. For a long time, the best known bound for the problem had been [Formula: see text], but recently a tight bound of [Formula: see text] was obtained. The case where F is unknown, such that the decision whether [Formula: see text] may depend only on the values of the random variables [Formula: see text], is equally well motivated but has received much less attention. A straightforward guarantee for this case of [Formula: see text] can be derived from the well-known optimal solution to the secretary problem, where an arbitrary set of values arrive in random order and the goal is to maximize the probability of selecting the largest value. We show that this bound is in fact tight. We then investigate the case where the stopping time may additionally depend on a limited number of samples from F, and we show that, even with o(n) samples, [Formula: see text]. On the other hand, n samples allow for a significant improvement, whereas [Formula: see text] samples are equivalent to knowledge of the distribution: specifically, with n samples, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], and with [Formula: see text] samples, [Formula: see text] for any [Formula: see text].


Biostatistics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 432-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J Artman ◽  
Inbal Nahum-Shani ◽  
Tianshuang Wu ◽  
James R Mckay ◽  
Ashkan Ertefaie

Summary Sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) designs have become increasingly popular in the field of precision medicine by providing a means for comparing more than two sequences of treatments tailored to the individual patient, i.e., dynamic treatment regime (DTR). The construction of evidence-based DTRs promises a replacement to ad hoc one-size-fits-all decisions pervasive in patient care. However, there are substantial statistical challenges in sizing SMART designs due to the correlation structure between the DTRs embedded in the design (EDTR). Since a primary goal of SMARTs is the construction of an optimal EDTR, investigators are interested in sizing SMARTs based on the ability to screen out EDTRs inferior to the optimal EDTR by a given amount which cannot be done using existing methods. In this article, we fill this gap by developing a rigorous power analysis framework that leverages the multiple comparisons with the best methodology. Our method employs Monte Carlo simulation to compute the number of individuals to enroll in an arbitrary SMART. We evaluate our method through extensive simulation studies. We illustrate our method by retrospectively computing the power in the Extending Treatment Effectiveness of Naltrexone (EXTEND) trial. An R package implementing our methodology is available to download from the Comprehensive R Archive Network.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document