Handbook of Semantic Word Norms

1979 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 562
Author(s):  
Benton J. Underwood ◽  
Michael P. Toglia ◽  
William F. Battig
Keyword(s):  
Word Norms

Spanish-English Bilingual Word Norms With New Examination of Comprehensive Cognate Measures

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Martin ◽  
Jeanette Altarriba ◽  
Matthew J. Pagano
Keyword(s):  
English Bilingual ◽  
Word Norms

scholarly journals Turkish Emotional Word Norms for Arousal, Valence, and Discrete Emotion Categories

2018 ◽  
pp. 003329411881472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aycan Kapucu ◽  
Aslı Kılıç ◽  
Yıldız Özkılıç ◽  
Bengisu Sarıbaz
Keyword(s):  
Negative Emotion ◽  
Large Set ◽  
Discrete Emotion ◽  
Word Level ◽  
Affective Norms ◽  
Word Norms ◽  
Specific Emotion ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Normative Ratings ◽  
Arousal And Valence

The present study combined dimensional and categorical approaches to emotion to develop normative ratings for a large set of Turkish words on two major dimensions of emotion: arousal and valence, as well as on five basic emotion categories of happiness, sadness, anger, fear, and disgust. A set of 2031 Turkish words obtained by translating Affective Norms for English Words to Turkish and pooling from the Turkish Word Norms were rated by a large sample of 1527 participants. This is the first comprehensive and standardized word set in Turkish offering discrete emotional ratings in addition to dimensional ratings along with concreteness judgments. Consistent with Affective Norms for English Words and word databases in several other languages, arousal increased as valence became more positive or more negative. As expected, negative emotions (anger, sadness, fear, and disgust) were positively correlated with each other, whereas the positive emotion, happiness, was negatively correlated with the negative emotion categories. Data further showed that the valence dimension was strongly correlated with happiness, and the arousal dimension was mostly correlated with fear. These findings show highly similar and consistent patterns with word sets provided in other languages in terms of the relationships between arousal and valence dimensions, relationships between dimensions and specific emotion categories, relationships among specific emotions, and further support the stability of the relationship between basic discrete emotions at the word level across different cultures.

Using the World-Wide Web to obtain large-scale word norms: 190,212 ratings on a set of 2,654 German nouns

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olaf Lahl ◽  
Anja S. Göritz ◽  
Reinhard Pietrowsky ◽  
Jessica Rosenberg
Keyword(s):  
World Wide Web ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
World Wide ◽  
Word Norms ◽  
The World

scholarly journals Modeling Memory: Exploring the Relationship Between Word Overlap and Single Word Norms when Predicting Relatedness Judgments and Retrieval

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Maxwell ◽  
Erin Michelle Buchanan
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Recall Performance ◽  
Memory Systems ◽  
Original Study ◽  
Cued Recall ◽  
Single Word ◽  
Recall Accuracy ◽  
Word Norms ◽  
Interactive Relationship ◽  
The Relationship

This study examined the interactive relationship between semantic, thematic, and associative word pair strength in the prediction of item relatedness judgments and cued-recall performance. Previously, we found significant three-way interactions between associative, semantic, thematic word overlap when predicting participant judgment strength and recall performance (Maxwell & Buchanan, 2018), expanding upon previous work by Maki (2007). In this study, we first seek to replicate findings from the original study using a novel stimuli set. Second, this study will further explore the nature of the structure of memory, by investigating the effects of single concept information (i.e., word frequency, concreteness, etc.) on relatedness judgments and recall accuracy. We hypothesize that associative, semantic, and thematic memory networks are interactive in their relationship to judgments and recall, even after controlling for base rates of single concept information, implying a set of interdependent memory systems used for both cognitive processes.

scholarly journals Withstanding the test of time: The 1978 semantic word norms

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 531-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Toglia
Keyword(s):  
Word Norms

scholarly journals Prediction English word concreteness ratios by their multidimensional Perceptual and action strength norms

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Dolatabadi
Keyword(s):  
Missing Values ◽  
Cross Validation ◽  
English Word ◽  
Optimum Number ◽  
Final Model ◽  
Word Norms ◽  
Word Concreteness ◽  
Participant Rating ◽  
Fold Cross Validation ◽  
Mlr Model

Many dataset resulted by participant rating for word norms also concreteness ratio areavailable. However infrequent word and none words concreteness rank is rare. Here we usedLancaster sensory motor words’ norms , to predict word concreteness ratios of Brysbaerdataset. After removing missing values and collinear variables, we employed a SW-MLR forchoosing optimum number of norms to make a prediction MLR model. Finally we validate ourmodel using 10-fold cross-validation. The final model could predict concreteness by RMSE0.5123 and R-square 0.7262.

Hand-Book of Semantic Word Norms

1979 ◽  
Vol 63 (5/6) ◽  
pp. 299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Keppel ◽  
Michael P. Toglia ◽  
William F. Battig ◽  
Kay Barrow ◽  
Desmond S. Cartwright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Word Norms

scholarly journals Turkish Emotional Word Norms for Arousal, Valence, and Discrete Emotion Categories

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aycan Kapucu ◽  
Aslı Kılıç ◽  
yıldız Özkılıç-Kartal ◽  
Bengisu Sarıbaz
Keyword(s):  
Negative Emotion ◽  
Large Set ◽  
Strongly Correlated ◽  
Discrete Emotion ◽  
Word Level ◽  
Word Norms ◽  
Specific Emotion ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Normative Ratings ◽  
Arousal And Valence

The present study combined dimensional and categorical approaches to emotion to develop normative ratings for a large set of Turkish words on two major dimensions of emotion: arousal and valence, as well as on five basic emotion categories of happiness, sadness, anger, fear, and disgust. A set of 2031 Turkish words obtained by translating ANEW (Bradley & Lang, 1999) words to Turkish and pooling from the Turkish Word Norms (Tekcan & Göz, 2005) were rated by a large sample of 1685 participants. This is the first comprehensive and standardized word set in Turkish offering discrete emotional ratings in addition to dimensional ratings along with concreteness judgments. Consistent with ANEW and word databases in several other languages, arousal increased as valence became more positive or more negative. As expected, negative emotions (anger, sadness, fear, and disgust) were positively correlated with each other; whereas the positive emotion, happiness, was negatively correlated with the negative emotion categories. Data further showed that the valence dimension was strongly correlated with happiness and the arousal dimension was mostly correlated with fear. These findings show highly similar and consistent patterns with word sets provided in other languages in terms of the relationships between arousal and valence dimensions, relationships between dimensions and specific emotion categories, relationships among specific emotions, and further support the stability of the relationship between basic discrete emotions at the word level across different cultures.

Compound Verbal Stimuli and Word Association

1965 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-406
Author(s):  
Richard O. Rouse ◽  
J. Scott Verinis
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Stimulus Pair ◽  
Word Association ◽  
Single Word ◽  
Verbal Stimuli ◽  
Free Associate ◽  
Word Norms ◽  
Low Degree ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Elementary Psychology

In two replications, 97 and 122 Williams College students in elementary psychology classes were given two lists of word pairs with instructions to give a discrete free associate to each pair. List A contained word-pairs designed to increase the frequency of the normative primary responses and List B contained pairs designed to increase the range of responses. The results showed that significantly fewer different responses and significantly higher frequencies for the primary responses were given to List A than to List B. Compared to the single-word norms, responses to List A had higher, and to List B, lower, commonality. Two factors were used in constructing List A: (1) the stimulus pair denoted or connoted a third word; (2) in common speech, a third word frequently follows the stimulus pair. The List B pairs lacked these factors, or had them in a low degree.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document