Binocular Depth Contrast and the Conditions of the Binocular Field

1938 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz Werner
1996 ◽  
Vol 36 (15) ◽  
pp. 2253-2262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond van EE ◽  
Casper J Erkelens

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 272-272
Author(s):  
H. Shigemasu ◽  
M. Yoshida ◽  
M. Kitazaki

1946 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth N. Ogle

1996 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 469-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Schneider ◽  
F.M. Leweke ◽  
W. Niemcyzk ◽  
U. Sternemann ◽  
M. Bevilacqua ◽  
...  

Science ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 249 (4968) ◽  
pp. 565-565
Author(s):  
Aad van den Enden ◽  
Henk Spekreijse
Keyword(s):  

1990 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. 353-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. EGGENREICH ◽  
K. KRAL

Visual fields and ommatidial angles of the compound eyes of Mantispa styriaca were determined using luminous pseudopupil and histological-anatomical techniques. The maximal horizontal overlap averaged 42.7° in femalesand 52.4° in males; females had only one overlap maximum, whereas males had two. In the dorsoventral direction, the binocular field had an overlap of 135.2° in the female and 142° in the male. In light-adapted eyes, optical acceptance angles reached values of 2.0°, and they reached 3.6° with dark adaptation; interommatidial angles were between 1.8° and 2.3°. The angles were very similar over the entire eye; no acute zone was found in the frontal part of the eye, as the large binocular overlap would suggest. The results are compared with those for the praying mantis: this animal is in no way related to Mantispa but resembles it in appearance and capture behaviour.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document