Religious Orientations and Selective Exposure among Fundamentalist Christians

1992 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam G. McFarland ◽  
James C. Warren
Keyword(s):  
Selective Exposure ◽  
Religious Orientations

Male and Female Voices: Selective Exposure to Sexism Reduction Efforts

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah J. Smith ◽  
Jessica L. McManus ◽  
Danielle C. Zanotti ◽  
Donald A. Saucier
Keyword(s):  
Selective Exposure ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Female Voices

Attitude Strength and Defensive Confidence as Moderators of Selective Exposure

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Tagler ◽  
Amanda J. Holmgreen ◽  
Cliff Ortlieb ◽  
Luanne Even
Keyword(s):  
Selective Exposure ◽  
Attitude Strength

When does (un)certainty motivate selective exposure? It depends on familiarity

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Sawicki ◽  
Jason K. Clark ◽  
Duane T. Wegener ◽  
Leandre R. Fabrigar ◽  
Steven M. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Selective Exposure

SELECTIVE EXPOSURE AND DISSONANCE AFTER DECISIONS

2002 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 527 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVE D'ALESSIO
Keyword(s):  
Selective Exposure

Selective Exposure to a Presidential Campaign Appeal

1974 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothy L. Barlett ◽  
Pamela B. Drew ◽  
Eleanor G. Fahle ◽  
William A. Watts
Keyword(s):  
Selective Exposure ◽  
Presidential Campaign

scholarly journals Echo chamber detection and analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Villa ◽  
Gabriella Pasi ◽  
Marco Viviani
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Community Detection ◽  
Virtual Communities ◽  
Selective Exposure ◽  
Social Needs ◽  
News Sources ◽  
Detection Strategy ◽  
Echo Chambers ◽  
Echo Chamber ◽  
Content Aware

AbstractSocial media allow to fulfill perceived social needs such as connecting with friends or other individuals with similar interests into virtual communities; they have also become essential as news sources, microblogging platforms, in particular, in a variety of contexts including that of health. However, due to the homophily property and selective exposure to information, social media have the tendency to create distinct groups of individuals whose ideas are highly polarized around certain topics. In these groups, a.k.a. echo chambers, people only "hear their own voice,” and divergent visions are no longer taken into account. This article focuses on the study of the echo chamber phenomenon in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, by considering both the relationships connecting individuals and semantic aspects related to the content they share over Twitter. To this aim, we propose an approach based on the application of a community detection strategy to distinct topology- and content-aware representations of the COVID-19 conversation graph. Then, we assess and analyze the controversy and homogeneity among the different polarized groups obtained. The evaluations of the approach are carried out on a dataset of tweets related to COVID-19 collected between January and March 2020.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document